DanTheGreater said:

I'm still waiting on your facts there Stiles. Left wing blogs and cut and paste articles from anti america propaganda sites does not a fact make.

That's rich, dude.

http://suicidegirls.com/boards/4995317/

http://suicidegirls.com/boards/4995453/

http://suicidegirls.com/boards/4995070/

http://suicidegirls.com/boards/4995089/

http://suicidegirls.com/boards/4994087/

http://suicidegirls.com/boards/4994139/

Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

Ubiquitous_Waz said:
*posts a fact* (but now one else can see it)

UW:"Waaahh you're stupid!"

*posts a fact*(which again no one can see.)

UW: "You're wrong because I say so naah naah naah naahhhh!"

Pattern recognition begins to kick in at this point.

*posts something that is amusing to himself and others*

UW: "Lets keep on topic"

*self abuse ensues*

You know what I looked and don't see where you posted any facts, made any contribution, or even an effort to discuss the topic.

bones_708

Houston, TX

December 2004

JUL 11, 2006 02:58 AM

oyaji said:

bones_708 said:

You know what I looked and don't see where you posted any facts, made any contribution, or even an effort to discuss the topic.

see above, stiles's post, dude.

Directed to UW asking about this thread in which he has made no contribution but insults.

You may be a pompous insufferable ass but you do discuss the topic even if incapable of disagreeing without insulting everyone with a different opinion.

joker_

Minneapolis, MN

October 2005

JUL 11, 2006 10:27 AM

Some one posting on here doesn't know the meaning of the word Rhetoric ....

I'm guessing it is the same person that has trouble reading an article all the way through.

Necia

San Francisco, CA

August 2005

JUL 11, 2006 11:47 AM

DanTheGreater said:

Necia said:

DanTheGreater said:

Necia said:

DanTheGreater said:
Do you honestly believe this garbage? Kerry (just like Gore before him) attacked the election results with recounts and lawyers. If there was honest to god proof of voter fraud by the Reps you don't think we would have heard about it on CNN/NBC/ABC/CBS/MSNBS/etc. 24 hours a day 7 days a week from then till now? If this were actually true we would STILL be getting stroies about it on the nightly news, but we don't because Kerry was just a sore loser. And a boring one to boot.

No, he didn't. Kerry never challenged the election results. He had them reviewed. It never went to court or anything.

Because his people found that there was nothing to fight, after reviewing the results from every direction Kerry was forced to conceed. And don't forget that outside groups DID sue over supposed voter fruad and lost or had there cases thrown out.

That's exactly what I already said in my original post in this thread. There wasn't solid enough evidence that the shenanigans that went on were enough to sway the election. That's not to say that no shenanigans went on; it's just to say that they couldn't be proven unquestionably to have given the election to Bush. That's why Kerry didn't challenge the results. So what's this bullshit about his being a sore loser? You just said yourself that he conceded. You're not making sense. (And outside groups suing over alleged voter fraud is not the same thing as Senator Kerry himself or as the Democratic Party challenging the results.)

Also, the 2004 election and the 2000 election aren't quite the same thing. If you still believe that Gore was just being a "sore loser" in 2000, you're delusional. Republicans ought to just shut up and thank their lucky stars that they were able to get away with that bullshit instead of still trying to take jabs at everyone who saw it for what it was.

You're right Gore was much, much MORE then a sore loser. And you honestly think Kerry and the Dems didn't push for those left wing actavist groups to sue in their sted? Don't be delusional. Maybe you libs have forgotten that its been DECADES since a Democrat won the Presidency with a MAJORITY vote.

Okay, dude? Elected officials win on pluralities all the time. I understand that. I know a bit more than just the basics of how our electoral system is set up. I've got just a wee bit of education on and experience with the subject. Also, that really has no bearing on what you're getting at, whatever that may be.

I'm not going to get into it with you about Gore or the 2000 election. There's no way that you can tell me that that wasn't utter bullshit, and like I said, y'all ought to be thanking your lucky stars that Bushy got away with that. It's appalling.

However, I'm DEFINITELY not going to get into it with you about Senator Kerry. I'm just not. You don't know what you're talking about, and you don't know enough about how he or his staffers operated or conducted themselves, during the election or immediately following, and you don't know much of anything about the operations of the DNC or these links you're alleging that it has with various leftist 527s (in total violation of campaign finance laws, I might add), and I do. You've got your wingnut "evil Dems" theories, but they've no bearing on or relation to the actual facts of the Kerry campaign or the DNC, so I'm not getting into it with you.