Blogging Can Get You In Trouble At Work

Workers fired for personal internet postings

WASHINGTON, Feb. 9, 2005 — Heather Armstrong worked as a Web designer for a Los Angeles software company. In February 2001, she started a blog — a Web log or online journal.

"It's sort of my hobby," she said. "Other people like to play instruments; I like to write online."

No names were used in her blog — not hers, her co-workers', nor her company's. But she was terminated after company executives were tipped off and read her posts, which included unflattering descriptions of many of them.

"What I was doing was completely benign," Armstrong said. "I never mentioned any trade secrets. I never mentioned the company."

Her Web site is located at dooce.com. Since her termination, some bloggers have taken to calling the act of being fired because of one's Web site being "dooced."

Anonymity on the World Wide Web?

At companies across the country, employees are being fired for Internet postings employers do not like.

It is a new and increasingly prevalent cause for termination. The firings raise a central question: How much anonymity can anyone expect on a portal called the "World Wide" Web?

"Many people don't understand how what they're writing on a blog is not as anonymous as they think it is," said Kurt Opsahl, a staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit advocacy group. "They feel like they're having a conversation with friends and family, when they're really having a conversation with anyone who comes by."

Last November, David Pilgreen, posted a message on a chat site frequented by his fellow Kmart employees. Hoping to rebut rumors of lackluster Thanksgiving weekend sales, Pilgreen — who worked at one of the retailer's distribution centers — posted positive, but internal, sales information.

"I never meant to harm Kmart or cause them any trouble," he said.

His bosses already knew Pilgreen's screen name, "DeepPerple." DeepPerple was immediately in deep trouble, fired after 16 years.

In a written statement, Kmart said that "as with all Company communications, confidential information should not be divulged to outside parties."

souljacker said:
Who the fuck has the time to read these blogs, let alone write one? I can't even find the time to update my journal on this site more often than like once a week and I usually just cut and paste song lyrics. Perhaps if I didn't work like 50 or 60 hours a week plus spend a bunch of additional time undercover as a superhero fighting crime, I would have more free time.

datsun said:
I think this could be grounds for a wrongful termination lawsuit...

Bosses at Waterstones must be regretting their decision to sack Joe Gordon, the Edinburgh man who lost his job after sounding off about the firm in his personal weblog. They didn't count on that hydra-like law of the blogosphere: take on one blogger, and dozens more will appear in his/her place.

Bloggers on both sides of the Atlantic rushed to his defence, most arguing that the company had over-reacted and was infringing his freedom of speech. Novelists Iain Banks and AL Kennedy wrote to the Herald in Glasgow calling for Gordon to get his job back. Waterstones also suffered the indignity of seeing Gordon's casual moniker for the store, "Bastardstone's", repeated in every retelling.