Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

297 | 298 | 299

 ... 487

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

5 | 6 | 7

Next

fenris23

fenris23

Vancouver, BC
February 2003

NOV 30, 2004 01:05 PM


Now, heads of state who ride and wrangle
Who look at your face for more than one angle
Can cut you from their bloated budgets
Like sharpened knives through chicken mcnuggets


(Shut the fuck) up
Yo, shut the fuck up
(Shut the fuck)
Right, right, learn to buck up
(Shut the fuck)
Right, shut the fuck up, hey, ho
(Shut the fuck)
Now, now learn to buck up

FreakPirate

FreakPirate

Canada
November 2002

NOV 30, 2004 01:07 PM

demetrius_z said:
Six pages and Tannhauser hasn't said "feminazis" yet. confused



I'm as shocked as you are...


I try really hard to listen to people when they tell me why Gay Marriage is wrong, but after just a few moments my head starts throbbing and I just want them to SHUT THE FUCK UP. They never ever make any sense.

"I don't care what they do. Well, they can't get married, obviously, but apart from that."

"I don't care about heterosexuals not having children, that's not the issue: I draw the line where children are concerned" 'Oh yeah? Where are children concerned in SSM?' "er, well, yeah, hang on..."



"I err... have to check my 'sources'... I'll be back..."

Dead_Ringer

Dead_Ringer

I'm lost
September 2004

NOV 30, 2004 01:10 PM

demetrius_z said:
Six pages and Tannhauser hasn't said "feminazis" yet. confused

I try really hard to listen to people when they tell me why Gay Marriage is wrong, but after just a few moments my head starts throbbing and I just want them to SHUT THE FUCK UP. They never ever make any sense.

"I don't care what they do. Well, they can't get married, obviously, but apart from that."

"I don't care about heterosexuals not having children, that's not the issue: I draw the line where children are concerned" 'Oh yeah? Where are children concerned in SSM?' "er, well, yeah, hang on..."



this reminds me of that OTHER thread where he went on and on for pages, continually failing to address the numerous instances where it was clearly illustrated he was incorrect about everything from equal protection, history, "genetics," and property rights. i guess he imagines that if he posts that dan quale link or dr. kurtz findings 30 more times they will start to begin to address the issue at hand and he will prove that he is not, in fact, just a guy who doesn't like gay people.

FreakPirate

FreakPirate

Canada
November 2002

NOV 30, 2004 01:13 PM

dead_ringer said:

this reminds me of that OTHER thread



Which one? There are at least three I know of...

where he went on and on for pages, continually failing to address the numerous instances where it was clearly illustrated he was incorrect about everything from equal protection, history, "genetics," and property rights. i guess he imagines that if he posts that dan quale link or dr. kurtz findings 30 more times they will start to begin to address the issue at hand and he will prove that he is not, in fact, just a guy who doesn't like gay people.



Sadly for him, crap plus crap plus crap still equals crap.

Pip

Pip

Framingham, MA
OLD SKOOL

NOV 30, 2004 05:45 PM

The problem is he has it all backwards.

By denying homosexuals the right to marry you will most likely kill the institution of marriage. How? Because Marriage is is about healthcare and 401k's and visitation rights at hospitals and on and on. So what will happen by denying gays the right to marry si that they will (and are!) taking to the courts to get these rights by any way they can. They are entitled to them so the courts have to grant these rights under different names, Civil Unions, Domestic Partnerships, etc. No what happens is you create something that is not a marriage but grants all the same rights and privilidges as marriage. I am not going down the seperat but equal road, even though that is a valid defense for same-sex-marriage. Instead lets look at what will most likely happen were these parallel instituions be allowed to flourish. Straight look and realize that they do not need to get married because the institution of marriage has been undermined and has been made obsolete. So straight people stop getting married. Thus ends the debate.

Anyone who cares about marriage needs to support same sex marriage.


Sorry but 7 pages and this was not mentioned. I know he's probable done with the thread but I would like to hear what Mr. T ahs tpo say about this.

s5

s5

STAFF

San Francisco, CA

NOV 30, 2004 06:11 PM

troglodyte said:
Kill yourself.



didn't i already delete a couple of your "kill yourself"'s?

troglodyte

troglodyte

Victoria, BC
May 2003

NOV 30, 2004 06:13 PM

Did you?

s5

s5

STAFF

San Francisco, CA

NOV 30, 2004 06:17 PM

troglodyte said:
Did you?



yes, please stop.

troglodyte

troglodyte

Victoria, BC
May 2003

NOV 30, 2004 06:18 PM

okie dokie doggy daddy.

s5

s5

STAFF

San Francisco, CA

NOV 30, 2004 06:20 PM

hey, with any luck, we might have just killed this thread.

ferret

ferret

I'm lost
OLD SKOOL

NOV 30, 2004 11:43 PM

poor thready.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

5 | 6 | 7

Next