Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

348 | 349 | 350

 ... 487

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next

Pauillac

Pauillac

Canada
April 2003

AUG 01, 2004 05:56 AM

Mike said:

Mike said:

TheFuckOffKid said:

Mike said:
I think the point is Americans do not like any outside country getting involved in our politics.


How do you think the other countries feel when you keep doing it to them? whatever


I bet they do not like it either, but fuck 'em. wink


I will say it before you can remark. This was a joke.



A joke? I don't think so; more like the prevailing attitude of the (surprisingly large) group of simple minded and jingoistic voters who make the election of someone like Bush possible.

Attitudes like this do a lot to generate ill will towards the U.S.. They also tend to build upon the stereotype of " the Ugly American ". Nothing to be proud of - retrospectively calling it a joke doesn't make it funny.

gramsci

gramsci

United Kingdom
November 2003

AUG 01, 2004 05:57 AM

Mike said:

gramsci said:

Mike said:

gramsci said:
Stock why all the racism towards the French? Every time something comes up you post an anti-French thread.

To the Moderator:
If you replace French with "Black" or "Jew" you would have kicked Stock off the site long ago! Why are the moderators ok with Stock's obvious racism towards French people, when if he spoke the same way about Black or Jewish people you'd come down like a ton of bricks? Is racism against the French OK according to the SG staff?


Maybe its because the French are not a race.


Neither are Jews, its a religion made up of different races... your point?


Whats the root word of racism? Race. If you need help here is a little help:

ra·cism [ ráy sìzz?m ]

noun

1. animosity toward other races: prejudice or animosity against people who belong to other races


2. belief in racial superiority: the belief that people of different races have different qualities and abilities, and that some races are inherently superior or inferior



Ok, argue on semantics all you want. If you are ok with attacking a group of people just because it doesn't fit in with your dictionary definition, that's just swell.

So its ok for someone to say "All Americans are evil and should be killed" or signs that say Irish people aren’t allowed in bars –like they used to have in the UK- because Americans and Irish are not a "race" as you purported about the French?

Mike11

Mike11

Titusville, FL
OLD SKOOL

AUG 01, 2004 06:03 AM

TheFuckOffKid said:
Oh for FUCK'S sake, are people going out of their way to be stupid this week?

YOU said: "I think the point is Americans do not like any outside country getting involved in our politics."

For reasons that totally escape me, you seem to be fine with the shoe being on the other foot. You seem to think that the US meddling in the politics of other countries is just dandy.

Two of those countries where the US has being arguably at least as "interventionist" (or partisan) as stockula is accusing the French of being re the US election, are the UK, and Australia.



Thank you for saying I was right.
Stockula said that, not me. Why are you putting his words in my mouth? Cant you tell us apart?
Please do not take your anger for what Stokula says out on me. That is not exactly fair, is it?

gramsci

gramsci

United Kingdom
November 2003

AUG 01, 2004 06:04 AM

walkswithbears said:
...and by the way, germany's army was defeated by ENGLAND primarily, not america. america 'liberated' no-one.



Umm, No! BRITISH army was totally defeated by Nazi Germany. Without the help of Commonwealth, American and most importantly Soviet troops you'd be speaking German right now. The primary victor of WWII was the Soviets, US running a close second.

Mike11

Mike11

Titusville, FL
OLD SKOOL

AUG 01, 2004 06:10 AM

gramsci said:
So its ok for someone to say "All Americans are evil and should be killed" or signs that say Irish people aren’t allowed in bars –like they used to have in the UK- because Americans and Irish are not a "race" as you purported about the French?


Wow, did I say it was okay? Nope.
All I said was you couldnt call someone a racist for judging someone from the country they come from. It may not be right but its not racism.
Why are you taking my comment out of text or assume that I am saying something that I am not?

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

AUG 01, 2004 06:10 AM

Mike

My anger is entirely appropriately directed at you. I'll give it all back to you with stockula's name excised.

You said: "I think the point is Americans do not like any outside country getting involved in our politics."

For reasons that totally escape me, you seem to be fine with the shoe being on the other foot. You seem to think that the US meddling in the politics of other countries is just dandy.

Two of those countries where the US has been accused of being "interventionist" are the UK and Australia.

Why this amounts to me saying you "are right" beats the hell out of me. What you seem to be saying is:
- you resent any outside involvement in US politics;
- you seem quite fine with US interference in the politics of other countries, including those of your allies.

That is hypocrisy. I have called you on it, and you've been dodging ever since.

Mike11

Mike11

Titusville, FL
OLD SKOOL

AUG 01, 2004 06:12 AM

gramsci said:
So its ok for someone to say "All Americans are evil and should be killed" or signs that say Irish people aren’t allowed in bars –like they used to have in the UK- because Americans and Irish are not a "race" as you purported about the French?


Maybe it could be called anti-nationalism.

Mike11

Mike11

Titusville, FL
OLD SKOOL

AUG 01, 2004 06:18 AM

Pauillac said:

Mike said:

Mike said:

TheFuckOffKid said:

Mike said:
I think the point is Americans do not like any outside country getting involved in our politics.


How do you think the other countries feel when you keep doing it to them? whatever


I bet they do not like it either, but fuck 'em. wink


I will say it before you can remark. This was a joke.



A joke? I don't think so; more like the prevailing attitude of the (surprisingly large) group of simple minded and jingoistic voters who make the election of someone like Bush possible.

Attitudes like this do a lot to generate ill will towards the U.S.. They also tend to build upon the stereotype of " the Ugly American ". Nothing to be proud of - retrospectively calling it a joke doesn't make it funny.


It was my joke so the fact that you do not find it funny it moot. I did and thats why I said it - even stating it so people wouldnt get upset. I guess next time I will post it in the jokes group.
I am very sorry if I offended you in any way.

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

AUG 01, 2004 06:31 AM

Mike said:
It was my joke so the fact that you do not find it funny it moot.


The whole point of you making a smart ass joke was to avoid responding to the underlying point.

Mike11

Mike11

Titusville, FL
OLD SKOOL

AUG 01, 2004 06:37 AM

TheFuckOffKid said:
- you resent any outside involvement in US politics;
- you seem quite fine with US interference in the politics of other countries, including those of your allies.

That is hypocrisy. I have called you on it, and you've been dodging ever since.


1. I do not resent outside involvement in US politics. I could care less what the French, UK, Australia or any other country might think of our politics. Thats why I said Americans and not me specifically.
2. The fact that you say I "seem quite fine with US interference in the politics of other countries" shows me you are making an opinion. That and the fact that I never said it.
3.I never said we could do it and others couldnt. NEVER - not even in my joke did I say that. So where is the hypocrisy in that?

You called me on nothing so I am not dodging anything. Let me know as soon as you can tell the difference between my posts and other peoples posts.<-



[Edited on Aug 01, 2004 by Mike]

Mike11

Mike11

Titusville, FL
OLD SKOOL

AUG 01, 2004 06:42 AM

TheFuckOffKid said:

Mike said:
It was my joke so the fact that you do not find it funny it moot.


The whole point of you making a smart ass joke was to avoid responding to the underlying point.


So sorry.
The question was: How do you think the other countries feel when you keep doing it to them?
My answer is: I bet they do not like it and if I was the leader (or person running for office)of that country I would tell them that their input into our election is not wanted or needed.

WaTed

WaTed

United Kingdom
September 2002

AUG 01, 2004 06:50 AM

Mike said:
My answer is: I bet they do not like it and if I was the leader (or person running for office)of that country I would tell them that their input into our election is not wanted or needed.



Yeah, cos THAT would work against the US foreign policy. surreal

Well done Mike, very insightful.

ViolenceJack

ViolenceJack

Wichita, KS
April 2003

AUG 01, 2004 06:51 AM

I like pie.

Pauillac

Pauillac

Canada
April 2003

AUG 01, 2004 07:14 AM

WaTed said:

Mike said:
My answer is: I bet they do not like it and if I was the leader (or person running for office)of that country I would tell them that their input into our election is not wanted or needed.



Yeah, cos THAT would work against the US foreign policy. surreal

Well done Mike, very insightful.



I think the issue is rather larger than offering " input " into elections. People in other countries probably take much more offense to actions like:

- threatening trade sanctions
- destabilizing economies
- supporting coups
- armed intervention

I could give a fuck if GWB (or any other President) offered an opinion as to who they would like to see win an election in my country.
I do, however. resent "input" when it is accompanied by an " or else".

Mefistofeles

Mefistofeles

Sweden
July 2003

AUG 01, 2004 07:52 AM


Solidly anti-American, and solidly pro-Kerry.



I thought Kerry was an American?

Tony1970

Tony1970

Titusville, FL
December 2003

AUG 01, 2004 10:16 AM

walkswithbears said:
and by the way, germany's army was defeated by ENGLAND primarily, not america. america 'liberated' no-one.



I can't stop laughing at this, I can't even respond any further I am laughing so hard, thanks for posting the joke cause I know you can't be serious

FrankMask

FrankMask

Saint Paul, MN
June 2003

AUG 01, 2004 10:39 AM

This is the most contrived and poorly written decade I have ever had the displeasure of living through. the actors are weak, the plot is thin to nonexistant, and every damned turn is so contrived it hurts.

gramsci

gramsci

United Kingdom
November 2003

AUG 01, 2004 01:23 PM

Tony1970 said:

walkswithbears said:
and by the way, germany's army was defeated by ENGLAND primarily, not america. america 'liberated' no-one.



I can't stop laughing at this, I can't even respond any further I am laughing so hard, thanks for posting the joke cause I know you can't be serious



I know! But you obviously don't understand the Brits. They still think they're mighty empire, when the reality is they're just a small island off the coast of Europe.

Rule Britannia...!

tretiak

tretiak

San Francisco, CA
March 2003

AUG 01, 2004 04:18 PM



walkswithbears said:
and by the way, germany's army was defeated by ENGLAND primarily, not america. america 'liberated' no-one.



Two Words:
Dunkirk

I mean:
Market Garden

As to gramsci's observation, if your metrics are warm beer, foul weather and pop sensations sweeping the country fortnightly, Britan is a mighty empire indeed.

Why the warm beer part?

Insert Lucas joke of your choice here.

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

AUG 01, 2004 04:32 PM

Mike said:
1. I do not resent outside involvement in US politics. I could care less what the French, UK, Australia or any other country might think of our politics. Thats why I said Americans and not me specifically.
2. The fact that you say I "seem quite fine with US interference in the politics of other countries" shows me you are making an opinion. That and the fact that I never said it.
3.I never said we could do it and others couldnt. NEVER - not even in my joke did I say that. So where is the hypocrisy in that?

You called me on nothing so I am not dodging anything. Let me know as soon as you can tell the difference between my posts and other peoples posts.


OK, Mike. I responded to your post as I read it in the context of this thread.

If I mistook or misread that context and how your post fitted into it, I withdraw my charge of hypocrisy.

Having said that, I'm at a loss as to how your post fits in with the French or the US political scene or any point stockula was trying to make or that other people have been refuting. So at this point, I can but shrug.

But, again, with your clarification offered, I see no hypocrisy in your position. OK?

rottenart

rottenart

Norman, OK
February 2004

AUG 02, 2004 02:25 AM

this thread is wallowing in hilarity. stock, you are completely insane. you must be smoking that MTF i hear so much about.

TheRedBaron

TheRedBaron

Cambridge, MA
November 2003

AUG 02, 2004 02:14 PM

stockula said:
You're right. The French weren't being cynical and amoral by shitcanning their alliance with the country that liberated them in 1944 in favor of a murderous Stalinist dictator who had invaded two countries and killed hundreds of thousands of his own people.

Why on Earth would I ever harbor bad blood over that? Why is it ok to liberate Germany and France from a murderous dictator that never attacked the United States, but not ok to liberate the Iraqi people from a murderous dictator that never attacked the United States?

Yes, Saddam was evil. No, the United States is not evil. I would call countries that enable and assist evil countries like Saddam's Iraq for financial reasones after the world community shunned it in 1991 to be (most charitably) amoral and cynical.



I have to take issue with two things here:
You realized you just said that nazi Germany never attacked the us (the US).
German U-boats attacked U.S. merchant and transport ships. Germany communicating with Mexico, trying to convince them to attack America (ineffectively, but a threatening gesture nonetheless). And, you know, pearl harbor. Not Germany its self, but wasn’t one argument for invading Iraq that its “allies” (Al Qaeda) had attacked America? Huh....

Also. I don’t believe no one has mentioned this. Stock. You keep sayinghow the French ‘owe’ us for our help in ww2. Well, did it somehow slip your mind how they allied with us against Britain when we were trying to gain independence? Surely, the French contribution to your own countries revolution didn’t slip your mind.

And shit, if that’s not enough, they gave us a great deal on everythin’ west of the Mississip’.

walkswithbears

walkswithbears

United Kingdom
March 2003

AUG 02, 2004 03:03 PM

*raises hand on behalf of EVERYBODY, even n00bs who signed up yesterday*

JohnClement

JohnClement

Silver Spring, MD
January 2004

AUG 02, 2004 03:58 PM

Idjiit said:
If you knew who started this thread just by looking at the title, raise your hand!



In a nod to MisterSatan, "Oh yeah!"

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next