New non-story for the media to ignore

BWahahahahaha!!!! For being a laughable non-story, Berger has suddenly become as welcome as radioactive dogshit. His nuts are going to look good stapled to Ashcroft's office wall


Berger Steps Down As Kerry Adviser

1 hour, 54 minutes ago


By CURT ANDERSON, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - Former national security adviser Sandy Berger quit Tuesday as an informal adviser to Democrat John Kerry (news - web sites)'s presidential campaign after disclosure of a criminal investigation into whether he mishandled classified terrorism documents.



Berger expressed regret over the incident, which he called an "honest mistake."

His decision to quit the Kerry campaign came as both parties sought to use the investigation to gain political advantage or to control damage.

Republicans said the probe raises questions about whether the former Clinton administration official was trying to hide embarrassing materials from the public. Democrats questioned why disclosure of a months-old investigation came just before Thursday's release of the final report by the commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks.

The report is expected to be highly critical of the government's handling of the pre-Sept. 11 terror threat.

"So is this about Sandy Berger, or is this about politics?" asked Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md.

Former President Clinton (news - web sites) also weighed in, telling reporters at a Denver autograph session for his book "My Life" that "it's interesting timing."

Berger served as national security adviser for all of Clinton's second term. "I know him. He's a good man. He worked his heart out for this country," Clinton said.

Speaking to reporters outside his office Tuesday, Berger said: "Last year, when I was in the Archives reviewing documents, I made an honest mistake. It's one that I deeply regret.

"I dealt with this issue in October 2003 fully and completely. Everything that I have done all along in this process has been for the purpose of aiding and supporting the work of the 9-11 commission, and any suggestion to the contrary is simply absolutely wrong."

The Justice Department (news - web sites) is investigating whether Berger committed a crime by removing from the National Archives documents about the government's anti-terror efforts and notes that he took on those documents. Berger was reviewing the materials to help determine which Clinton administration documents to provide to the Sept. 11 commission.

Berger and his lawyer, Lanny Breuer, said the former Clinton adviser knowingly removed the handwritten notes by placing them in his jacket and pants and inadvertently took copies of actual classified documents in a leather portfolio.

House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, told reporters the case was about theft and questioned a statement by Berger issued Monday attributing the removal of the documents and notes to sloppiness. Along with putting documents in his coat and pants, Berger acknowledged removing some documents in a portfolio. He returned most of the documents, but some still are missing.

"That's not sloppy," DeLay said. "I think its gravely, gravely serious what he did, if he did it. It could be a national security crisis."

House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., said he was "profoundly troubled" by the allegations, adding that Berger "has a lot of explaining to do."

Breuer said Berger has offered to cooperate with investigators. He said the decision to step aside from the Kerry campaign was done because "Mr. Berger does not want any issue surrounding the 9/11 commission to be used for partisan purposes."

Kerry said later: "Sandy Berger is my friend, and he has tirelessly served this nation with honor and distinction. I respect his decision to step aside as an adviser to this campaign until this matter is resolved objectively and fairly."



Deputy Attorney General James Comey would not comment on the investigation other than that in general the Justice Department regards takes "very, very seriously" allegations of mishandled classified materials.

"It's our lifeblood, those secrets," Comey said.

The documents involved have been a key point of contention between the Clinton and Bush administrations on the question of who responded more forcefully to the threat of al-Qaida terrorism. Written by former National Security Council aide Richard Clarke, they discuss the 1999 plot to attack U.S. millennium celebrations and offer more than two dozen recommendations for improving the response to Osama bin Laden (news - web sites)'s al-Qaida network.

In his April 13 testimony to the Sept. 11 commission, Attorney General John Ashcroft (news - web sites) said the review "warns the prior administration of a substantial al-Qaida network" in the United States. Ashcroft said it also recommends such things as using tougher visa and border controls and prosecutions of immigration violations and minor criminal charges to disrupt terror cells.

"These are the same aggressive, often-criticized law enforcement tactics that we have unleashed for 31 months to stop another al-Qaida attack," Ashcroft told the panel. He added that he never saw the documents before the Sept. 11 attacks.

Berger said in his March 23 testimony that Clinton submitted a $300 million supplemental budget to Congress to pay for implementing many of the documents' recommendations. Berger acknowledged, however, that not all of them were accomplished.

In his statement Monday, Berger said that every Clinton administration document requested by the Sept. 11 commission was provided to the panel. Berger also said he returned some classified documents and all his handwritten notes when he was asked about them, except for two or three copies of the millennium report that may have been thrown away.

Al Felzenberg, spokesman for the Sept. 11 commission, said the Berger investigation will have no bearing on the panel's highly anticipated report.

"This is a matter between the government and an individual," Felzenberg said. "They were not our documents, and we believe we have access to all the materials we need to see to do our report."

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/ap/20040721/ap_on_el_pr/sept_11_berger_probe

[Edited on Jul 20, 2004 by stockula]

An update Stock...Page 2 of today's (tuesday) Washington Post, under the National News Headline.

I still don't think it was that important of a story

"That's not sloppy," DeLay said. "I think its gravely, gravely serious what he did, if he did it. It could be a national security crisis."

Wow, I wonder what his opinion of diverting Homeland Security resources to apprehend Texas lawmakers in Oklahama would be

This kinda reminds me of that time when the NSC just destroyed a bunch of documents so congress couldn't see them and find out the NSC was breaking the law in all kinds of ways and selling arms to a country that sponsored terrorism so they could illegally fund a bunch of thugs...

Except it's not nearly as bad.

Number of times Colin Powell said "I don't recall" or "I can't recall" in his 1987 Iran Contra testimony: 56 (from harper's magazine)

I guess my point is, in the scheme of NSC scandals, this is very very very very small stuff. If Berger is indicted, then it should make the front page. Until then, it's fine on page 16.

No, not important at all that women are still excluded by virtue of their gender form the corridors of power. Places where relationships are forged deals are struck and careers are made. Not only are women not allowed to join, they're not allowed to play even as guests and the have to use their own segregated fucking entrance. Thats right boys and girls, women aren't good enough to use the same door as Hootie Johnson. This caveman nonsense is made possible by IBM, Coke and CBS. Its a story. Never mind that every news outlet in the country and most of the majors in the world covered the story look at who these people are.

Gee, I don't know, the NOW declares war on the biggest GOB club in the country and the Georgia state police call in the riot squad to handle the protests, and the freakin' Scotsman devoted half an article to it yesterday. Could be a story.

Of course its news. Its just not the kind of news you think it is as evidenced by the fact that you clearly didn't even read the article carefully enough to know what happened. If you had more than innuendo and speculation, if you had even a plausible theory behind your venom, you'd share it but you don't so you refuse to answer even basic questions, and drag up every pet outrage the people who think for you spew forth as a smokescreen. You hate Berger because he doesn't play for your team. Period. Thats cool, but don't pretend fact or reason play a part in it.

Still waiting on your Wilson facts, BTW.

don't bet on it. these people can't be wrong. it's just not possible.

Just a side note, I put things in my jacket and my pants all the time. They're called pockets. Sometimes things will still be in my pockets the next day!

Stock and others seem to be pushing this as if he stuffed papers down the front of his pants, but I've seen nothing about this - the only reference is "pants" - other than he allegedly put something in his sock, which is being denied.

Can we all agree that Stock might have been a little premature in his declaration of a liberal media cover-up?

what a great photo. bean +10 points