Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14

 ... 495

Next

Canadian_Coat

Canadian_Coat

Brockville, ON
September 2008

APR 04, 2012 03:18 PM

President Barack Obama has signed legislation barring members of Congress, the president and thousands of federal workers from insider trading and profiting from nonpublic information learned on the job.

Obama signed the Stop Trading On Congressional Knowledge Act, or the STOCK Act, at an event Wednesday morning.

The bipartisan legislation prohibits thousands of individuals —such as the president, vice-president, members of congress, and executive branch workers, and all their family members — from buying and selling securities based on knowledge obtained through their jobs.

The legislation was passed unanimously by the Senate and breezed through the House of Representatives by a margin of 417 to 2. It is the most extensive effort to clamp down on congressional activities in years.

Senator Joseph Lieberman, chief sponsor of the measure, called it “the most significant congressional ethics legislation we’ve adopted in at least five years.”

The act will require lawmakers and executive branch members to file regular reports with financial regulators. The reports will then be made available online and searchable.

The president, vice president or an elected state or local official will also be forbidden from collecting federal retirement benefits if convicted of certain felonies.

Source

Two Questions:

1. Why the fuck has it taken this long to create this law?
2. How much will it prevent? (I assume some officials will both try, and possibly succeed, to still do this)

mydogfarted

mydogfarted

Oakland, NJ
June 2003

APR 04, 2012 03:51 PM

Canadian_Coat said:

President Barack Obama has signed legislation barring members of Congress, the president and thousands of federal workers from insider trading and profiting from nonpublic information learned on the job.

Obama signed the Stop Trading On Congressional Knowledge Act, or the STOCK Act, at an event Wednesday morning.

The bipartisan legislation prohibits thousands of individuals —such as the president, vice-president, members of congress, and executive branch workers, and all their family members — from buying and selling securities based on knowledge obtained through their jobs.

The legislation was passed unanimously by the Senate and breezed through the House of Representatives by a margin of 417 to 2. It is the most extensive effort to clamp down on congressional activities in years.

Senator Joseph Lieberman, chief sponsor of the measure, called it “the most significant congressional ethics legislation we’ve adopted in at least five years.”

The act will require lawmakers and executive branch members to file regular reports with financial regulators. The reports will then be made available online and searchable.

The president, vice president or an elected state or local official will also be forbidden from collecting federal retirement benefits if convicted of certain felonies.

Source

Two Questions:

1. Why the fuck has it taken this long to create this law?
2. How much will it prevent? (I assume some officials will both try, and possibly succeed, to still do this)



It's a feel good law, basically bullshit. "Look! We have ethics!" might make some people feel warm and fuzzy. The rest of us know that the majority of lifer politicians are scumbags in some way.

spinhouse247

spinhouse247

Punta Gorda, FL
December 2003

APR 04, 2012 11:01 PM

I'll bet his campaign contributors have exemptions.

Aaron

Aaron

Shakopee, MN
July 2004

APR 04, 2012 11:03 PM

spinhouse247 said:
I'll bet his campaign contributors have exemptions.



OH YEAH! Well I bet your face has an exemption!

/sarcasm

Also, please read before you start babbling, this is a law that applies to members of congress and executive officials.

MisterSatan

MisterSatan

Portland, OR
August 2002

APR 04, 2012 11:43 PM

spinhouse247 said:
I'll bet his campaign contributors have exemptions.



Oh, you're not even trying anymore.

abbazappa

abbazappa

Sacramento, CA
June 2006

APR 05, 2012 12:33 AM

Bad news for Dianne Feinstein, good news for the rest of us

Mr_Matt_

Mr_Matt_

Pompano Beach, FL
July 2005

APR 05, 2012 02:12 AM

Did anyone watch the 60 minutes story that prompted this? You should.

They were running such a racket. It was rather funny watching both Pelosi and Boehner getting exposed for it. A lot of money was made through this system.

So I think it's a good law. I also remember hearing that this is a watered down version, because of course they had to preserve some benefit to holding office. But I'm not doing that research at 5AM.

Sal_

Sal_

USA
October 2009

APR 05, 2012 02:25 AM

Of course it's watered down, look how easily it passed.

I am wondering how effective it will really be considering that pretty much everyone in the house, senate and the president agreed on it.

XXJCBlackheartXX

XXJCBlackheartXX

Tucson, AZ
July 2008

APR 05, 2012 12:20 PM

How can conservative be so reflexive to something that would benefit the whole political transparency of the whole country...Oh yeah i forgot lobbyist...

Last time I check insider trading was illegal...unless your a member of congress then its just swept under the rug...I hope this take hold and changes lobbying but I will not hold my breathe...The GOP pretty much depend on this to fund their election years if they don't do for the big corporations then they don't get dollars to stop the liberals from winning elections...plain and simple....I am an Independent voter and can't even see partisanship in this...if its illegal for the many it shouldn't be a misnomer for the few especially elected officials right or left who SERVE ...and i say serve the people of this country

abbazappa

abbazappa

Sacramento, CA
June 2006

APR 05, 2012 03:44 PM

XXJCBlackheartXX this bill got bi-partisan (i.e. the Republicans and Democrats both voted yes for it) support and while it's not perfect it is at least a step in the right direction. As for lobbyists donating to campaigns the same can be said about unions donating to campaigns but that would be a discussion for campaign financing not about banning insider trading for elected officials.