Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 495

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8

 ... 21

Next

mydogfarted

mydogfarted

Oakland, NJ
June 2003

MAR 27, 2012 07:33 AM

Templar2749 said:

motorfirebox said:
First one you linked, 2:22. He mutters it under his breath. You can find analyses of that particular segment all around the web.



Don't want to argue with you but since you posted this I went back and listened at least 10 times to that part with the volume up. Can't make that out one way or the other.



Here, maybe this will help. Posted on page 2:

wildswan said:
Wow:


I have a pretty bad case of tinnitus and heard "Fucking Coons" pretty clearly (start at about 1:50 in the video).
Could he be pissed off at this guy:
zoom image
Possibly. They are becoming a problem Florida. whatever

I haven't seen the prior police filings about the jewelry. Link?

MissyMalice

MissyMalice

USA
May 2010

MAR 27, 2012 07:35 AM

Templar2749 said:

motorfirebox said:
First one you linked, 2:22. He mutters it under his breath. You can find analyses of that particular segment all around the web.



Don't want to argue with you but since you posted this I went back and listened at least 10 times to that part with the volume up. Can't make that out one way or the other.
The good news is the tape has reportedly been sent to the F.B.I.
Can we agree that the F.B.I.'s voice enhancement and forensic analysis of the tape should prove what he said and what he didn't? All I'm saying is that until all the facts are in, how can you or anyone know that racism was his motivating factor in shooting him?
Like I mentioned, I don't want to demonize Trayvon either but these facts have come out so far:
1.Zimmerman stated the teenager appeared to be on drugs-Well we know from police reports that Trayvon had been caught with a marijuana pipe and marijuana residue. Does that mean he deserved to get shot? Of course not.
2. Zimmerman claimed that Trayvon was acting suspicious-We also know from a prior police report in Trayvon's school that he had been caught with a bag full of jewelry and a screwdriver, including wedding bands, women's earrings etc...-He claimed a friend "gave" it to him. Does THIS mean he deserved to get shot? Of course not.

My point is you and several others appear to be choosing to believe every negative stereotype about Zimmerman and yet at the same time choose to believe that it's impossible that Trayvon was up to no good that night (I'm not saying that he was or wasn't, I don't have enough facts for that) or that at the time that Zimmerman pulled the trigger, he honestly felt in fear of his life. Now, whether or not Zimmerman put himself in the position to be attacked is another point entirely and I believe the F.B.I. forensics of the tape, the various witnesses who called 911 and other facts are ALL being looked at right now in deciding whether or not to charge Zimmerman. Let's see what these facts actually ARE before we condemn the man as being a racist who simply wanted to shoot a black teenager.

For those who may believe someone wouldn't be breaking into or casing houses in a neighborhood where they had family members living, I've seen it happen with next door NEIGHBORS breaking into their neighbors house when they were out of town. Again, I'm not saying this is what Trayvon was doing nor am I saying Zimmerman was right. I'm saying that we simply don't know what was in Zimmerman's mind. He will have to explain that to a grand jury and possibly his defense team will have to explain it to a judge and jury in a trial. I simply choose not to jump to conclusions until I've seen or heard more FACTS in this case.


No. The point is that those things don't matter. You're ignoring the fact that Zimmerman felt the need to use a gun in self defense against someone half his size. Trayvon was unarmed. So what part of that seems reasonable? Can you not see how it seems extremely likely that race played a huge role in Zimmerman's evaluation of Trayvon as a threat?

And for the record, you're the first person I've encountered that doesn't hear the phrase "fuckin coons" on that tape.

LastSerenade

LastSerenade

Bensalem, PA
November 2003

MAR 27, 2012 07:49 AM

MissyMalice said:

Templar2749 said:

motorfirebox said:
First one you linked, 2:22. He mutters it under his breath. You can find analyses of that particular segment all around the web.



Don't want to argue with you but since you posted this I went back and listened at least 10 times to that part with the volume up. Can't make that out one way or the other.
The good news is the tape has reportedly been sent to the F.B.I.
Can we agree that the F.B.I.'s voice enhancement and forensic analysis of the tape should prove what he said and what he didn't? All I'm saying is that until all the facts are in, how can you or anyone know that racism was his motivating factor in shooting him?
Like I mentioned, I don't want to demonize Trayvon either but these facts have come out so far:
1.Zimmerman stated the teenager appeared to be on drugs-Well we know from police reports that Trayvon had been caught with a marijuana pipe and marijuana residue. Does that mean he deserved to get shot? Of course not.
2. Zimmerman claimed that Trayvon was acting suspicious-We also know from a prior police report in Trayvon's school that he had been caught with a bag full of jewelry and a screwdriver, including wedding bands, women's earrings etc...-He claimed a friend "gave" it to him. Does THIS mean he deserved to get shot? Of course not.

My point is you and several others appear to be choosing to believe every negative stereotype about Zimmerman and yet at the same time choose to believe that it's impossible that Trayvon was up to no good that night (I'm not saying that he was or wasn't, I don't have enough facts for that) or that at the time that Zimmerman pulled the trigger, he honestly felt in fear of his life. Now, whether or not Zimmerman put himself in the position to be attacked is another point entirely and I believe the F.B.I. forensics of the tape, the various witnesses who called 911 and other facts are ALL being looked at right now in deciding whether or not to charge Zimmerman. Let's see what these facts actually ARE before we condemn the man as being a racist who simply wanted to shoot a black teenager.

For those who may believe someone wouldn't be breaking into or casing houses in a neighborhood where they had family members living, I've seen it happen with next door NEIGHBORS breaking into their neighbors house when they were out of town. Again, I'm not saying this is what Trayvon was doing nor am I saying Zimmerman was right. I'm saying that we simply don't know what was in Zimmerman's mind. He will have to explain that to a grand jury and possibly his defense team will have to explain it to a judge and jury in a trial. I simply choose not to jump to conclusions until I've seen or heard more FACTS in this case.


No. The point is that those things don't matter. You're ignoring the fact that Zimmerman felt the need to use a gun in self defense against someone half his size. Trayvon was unarmed. So what part of that seems reasonable? Can you not see how it seems extremely likely that race played a huge role in Zimmerman's evaluation of Trayvon as a threat?

And for the record, you're the first person I've encountered that doesn't hear the phrase "fuckin coons" on that tape.





Just looking at the description of the assault let's say he was smashing Zimmerman's head on the concrete, that could kill someone. If that were the case then it becomes a matter of life and death and perhaps that is when he shot.


We don't know that to be the case, but it's not impossible. An overweight man in his late 20's could be overpowered by an athletic teenager.

FellOnEarth

FellOnEarth

Temecula, CA
April 2006

MAR 27, 2012 07:51 AM


So here's what I got from that first article you posted. Treyvon Martin was visiting his father while he was on suspension. At least that's all that's pertinent to him being killed.

Honestly, I don't care for the "race baiting" or whatever the hell you want to call it, however, I do think race was a factor in Treyvon's death, possibly even in the ensuing investigation. Despite the polarizing effect that personalities like Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson may have (and I agree that they are generally distracting), they also happen to be lightning rods among the African American community. While it may not be entirely helpful for them to have placed themselves into the center of this tragedy, their presence isn't unwarranted, particularly given the injustice of the situation and inaction on the part of law enforcement.

I don't like the idea of people being agitated for political or personal gain, but I'm just not seeing Sharpton or Jackson as being very instrumental in this regard (I think there's already enough public outcry even without race being the issue - unfortunately it really is a part of the issue). In case you missed it, the handling of Martin's death is only the most recent complaint that the African American community has had with local law enforcement. The fact that Zimmerman also used a racial epithet moments before the shooting clearly doesn't settle well either.

Colinism

Colinism

Atlanta, GA
July 2005

MAR 27, 2012 07:51 AM

Missy, just to correct one thing. Zimmerman is 5'9" tall. Trayvon was between 6'2"-6'3" he was lighter as Zimmerman has more weight but trayvon was taller by about half a foot.

MissyMalice

MissyMalice

USA
May 2010

MAR 27, 2012 07:53 AM

LastSerenade said:
http://www.kansascity.com/2012/03/26/3515826/multiple-suspensions-paint-complicated.html

Has anyone read this yet? I know it touches on some previous articles but it seems odd that more details like this keep coming.



Interesting, but not exactly relevant to his death. First of all, a teenager smoking weed is not exactly a shocking or scandalous revelation.
And the story about the stolen jewelry seems to have very little support, just going by the article you posted here. No arrest or police investigation into the matter and his family was never notified of the incident? I'll have to side with the family on this one and say that, unless something else comes up about it, it just sounds like a rumor.

And even if both things were true, Zimmerman would have no way of knowing those things. Do they say anything about Martin's character? Maybe. The more troubling of the two issues seems to have no evidence behind it, though. So, in the end, we're still just dealing with an unarmed kid that got shot by a man twice his size in "self defense."

MissyMalice

MissyMalice

USA
May 2010

MAR 27, 2012 07:56 AM

Colinism said:
Missy, just to correct one thing. Zimmerman is 5'9" tall. Trayvon was between 6'2"-6'3" he was lighter as Zimmerman has more weight but trayvon was taller by about half a foot.



How is that "correcting" anything I said? I was referring to the weight difference. It doesn't matter how tall you are if you're skin and bones, which Trayvon had to have been at that height and weight.

LastSerenade

LastSerenade

Bensalem, PA
November 2003

MAR 27, 2012 08:06 AM

MissyMalice said:

Colinism said:
Missy, just to correct one thing. Zimmerman is 5'9" tall. Trayvon was between 6'2"-6'3" he was lighter as Zimmerman has more weight but trayvon was taller by about half a foot.



How is that "correcting" anything I said? I was referring to the weight difference. It doesn't matter how tall you are if you're skin and bones, which Trayvon had to have been at that height and weight.



it's more a reaction to the initial depictions of the victim, a week ago someone forwarded me a page claiming facts about the case and all it said was that Martin was a straight A student


now in Zimmerman's 911 call he says he sees someone suspicious in an area that has had breaks ins, while that may not tie directly into the shooting it is unsettling to know that and then find objects that could be considered either stolen or tools used in a theft

FellOnEarth

FellOnEarth

Temecula, CA
April 2006

MAR 27, 2012 08:07 AM

Just saw this little tidbit and it kind of hammers home the reason why Zimmerman should be held criminally accountable for his actions, even if you go by his version of events.

The Case for George Zimmerman is the case against him

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

The Atlantic's Andrew Cohen reported yesterday that, in the Trayvon Martin case, George Zimmerman's side of the story is starting to "get traction."
Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that the facts of the case are basically as Zimmerman's defenders claim: Zimmerman killed Martin because Martin was beating him up and Zimmerman felt his life was in danger. Even so, it seems to me that Zimmerman should do jail time for killing Martin.

Here are some things we know about the case:

1) A man with a gun pursued an unarmed teenager who had done nothing wrong.

2) The man with the gun initiated a confrontation with the teenager. I realize that we don't know exactly how any fight between Zimmerman and Martin started. And we never will, because only Zimmerman knows the details, and he's not exactly unbiased. But by my lights, if you pursue an innocent, law-abiding citizen, thereby giving him or her reason to believe that you mean them harm--and reason to conclude that their self-defense may require fighting--you have thereby initiated a confrontation. Zimmerman will presumably depict his role in the encounter as passive. That testimony should count for roughly nothing, but in any event I'd say that even if it's true, he still initiated a confrontation just by pursuing a guy in the dark until he caught up with him. (And he did that even though he knew he was violating the rules of the Neighborhood Watch game and in fact had just been reminded of that by a 911 dispatcher!)

3) As a result of the confrontation, the man with the gun shot the teenager to death.

When I see pictures of George Zimmerman I actually feel kind of sorry for him (though not as sorry as I feel for Trayvon Martin), and if his defenders are right about what happened then I should feel even sorrier for him. Still, do we want to live in a society where somebody with a gun can chase down an unarmed, law-abiding citizen, presumably scaring them to death, then kill them after a fight unsurprisingly breaks out--and still get off scot-free? Do you want every wannabe cop in America reading that this sort of thing is legal? Do you think America's actual cops want to live in a world like that?

If we don't want to live in a world like that, then the law shouldn't let George Zimmermans kill Trayvon Martins. And if Florida law now allows for things like this to happen, and Zimmerman gets off the hook, then after this case is over, the law should change.

Colinism

Colinism

Atlanta, GA
July 2005

MAR 27, 2012 08:10 AM

Missy, I will have to dissagree with you seeing as how I used to be that skinny, but I was athletic and I can easily see as a man that it is very possible for martin to effectively defend himself. If Zimmerman was all muscle then I would agree, but if it's just fat then it's hardly of any use against a taller opponent who has leverage.

MissyMalice

MissyMalice

USA
May 2010

MAR 27, 2012 08:19 AM

LastSerenade said:
it's more a reaction to the initial depictions of the victim, a week ago someone forwarded me a page claiming facts about the case and all it said was that Martin was a straight A student


now in Zimmerman's 911 call he says he sees someone suspicious in an area that has had breaks ins, while that may not tie directly into the shooting it is unsettling to know that and then find objects that could be considered either stolen or tools used in a theft



You're ignoring the fact that there was never any police investigation of that incident, and his family was never informed that it happened. What I'm getting at here is that there is zero proof that ever even happened.

MissyMalice

MissyMalice

USA
May 2010

MAR 27, 2012 08:20 AM

Colinism said:
Missy, I will have to dissagree with you seeing as how I used to be that skinny, but I was athletic and I can easily see as a man that it is very possible for martin to effectively defend himself. If Zimmerman was all muscle then I would agree, but if it's just fat then it's hardly of any use against a taller opponent who has leverage.



We'll have to agree to disagree on that, considering there is no objective way to determine which one of them had an advantage in a physical altercation. Even so, none of that would have mattered if Zimmerman hadn't deliberately ignored the instructions he was given by police to not follow the boy.

MissyMalice

MissyMalice

USA
May 2010

MAR 27, 2012 08:24 AM

FellOnEarth said:
Just saw this little tidbit and it kind of hammers home the reason why Zimmerman should be held criminally accountable for his actions, even if you go by his version of events.

The Case for George Zimmerman is the case against him

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

The Atlantic's Andrew Cohen reported yesterday that, in the Trayvon Martin case, George Zimmerman's side of the story is starting to "get traction."
Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that the facts of the case are basically as Zimmerman's defenders claim: Zimmerman killed Martin because Martin was beating him up and Zimmerman felt his life was in danger. Even so, it seems to me that Zimmerman should do jail time for killing Martin.

Here are some things we know about the case:

1) A man with a gun pursued an unarmed teenager who had done nothing wrong.

2) The man with the gun initiated a confrontation with the teenager. I realize that we don't know exactly how any fight between Zimmerman and Martin started. And we never will, because only Zimmerman knows the details, and he's not exactly unbiased. But by my lights, if you pursue an innocent, law-abiding citizen, thereby giving him or her reason to believe that you mean them harm--and reason to conclude that their self-defense may require fighting--you have thereby initiated a confrontation. Zimmerman will presumably depict his role in the encounter as passive. That testimony should count for roughly nothing, but in any event I'd say that even if it's true, he still initiated a confrontation just by pursuing a guy in the dark until he caught up with him. (And he did that even though he knew he was violating the rules of the Neighborhood Watch game and in fact had just been reminded of that by a 911 dispatcher!)

3) As a result of the confrontation, the man with the gun shot the teenager to death.

When I see pictures of George Zimmerman I actually feel kind of sorry for him (though not as sorry as I feel for Trayvon Martin), and if his defenders are right about what happened then I should feel even sorrier for him. Still, do we want to live in a society where somebody with a gun can chase down an unarmed, law-abiding citizen, presumably scaring them to death, then kill them after a fight unsurprisingly breaks out--and still get off scot-free? Do you want every wannabe cop in America reading that this sort of thing is legal? Do you think America's actual cops want to live in a world like that?

If we don't want to live in a world like that, then the law shouldn't let George Zimmermans kill Trayvon Martins. And if Florida law now allows for things like this to happen, and Zimmerman gets off the hook, then after this case is over, the law should change.



This pretty much sums up how I feel about it. I doubt Zimmerman is being honest, and even if he is, he still caused the events to unfold the way they did. It wouldn't be entirely surprising if Trayvon was the first to throw a punch. Some strange man was following him around and staring at him. Meanwhile, Zimmerman is the one bitching about "suspicious behavior." whatever

PointBlank

PointBlank

New York, NY
November 2004

MAR 27, 2012 08:25 AM

Jesus, this "what if Trayvon..." conversation is ridiculous.

All of the arguments about Zimmerman/Trayvon and a possible confrontation are perfectly valid, and should be brought up in a court. AFTER ZIMMERMAN WAS ARRESTED. He wasn't. . . and that is the issue.

Colinism

Colinism

Atlanta, GA
July 2005

MAR 27, 2012 08:27 AM

Missy we agree that Zimmerman should not have followed Martin. However you were claiming that his weight gave him a distinct advantage, I know from roughhousing and fighting that it does not.

Jamila

Jamila

SUICIDEGIRL

Oregon, USA

MAR 27, 2012 08:27 AM

MissyMalice said:

Colinism said:
Missy, I will have to dissagree with you seeing as how I used to be that skinny, but I was athletic and I can easily see as a man that it is very possible for martin to effectively defend himself. If Zimmerman was all muscle then I would agree, but if it's just fat then it's hardly of any use against a taller opponent who has leverage.



We'll have to agree to disagree on that, considering there is no objective way to determine which one of them had an advantage in a physical altercation. Even so, none of that would have mattered if Zimmerman hadn't deliberately ignored the instructions he was given by police to not follow the boy.



I'd say the person with the obvious physical advantage would be the one with the gun, who was able to shoot and kill someone armed with skittles. In a bar fight, who knows? Or cares.

Colinism

Colinism

Atlanta, GA
July 2005

MAR 27, 2012 08:27 AM

PointBlank said:
Jesus, this "what if Trayvon..." conversation is ridiculous.

All of the arguments about Zimmerman/Trayvon and a possible confrontation are perfectly valid, and should be brought up in a court. AFTER ZIMMERMAN WAS ARRESTED. He wasn't. . . and that is the issue.



Agreed.

MissyMalice

MissyMalice

USA
May 2010

MAR 27, 2012 08:34 AM

Jamila said:

MissyMalice said:

Colinism said:
Missy, I will have to dissagree with you seeing as how I used to be that skinny, but I was athletic and I can easily see as a man that it is very possible for martin to effectively defend himself. If Zimmerman was all muscle then I would agree, but if it's just fat then it's hardly of any use against a taller opponent who has leverage.



We'll have to agree to disagree on that, considering there is no objective way to determine which one of them had an advantage in a physical altercation. Even so, none of that would have mattered if Zimmerman hadn't deliberately ignored the instructions he was given by police to not follow the boy.



I'd say the person with the obvious physical advantage would be the one with the gun, who was able to shoot and kill someone armed with skittles. In a bar fight, who knows? Or cares.



Well people are trying to argue that Trayvon might have overpowered Zimmerman to the point where he needed to use the gun to save his own life. Which I found doubtful, but it's not exactly something anyone can prove either way.

MissyMalice

MissyMalice

USA
May 2010

MAR 27, 2012 08:36 AM

Colinism said:
Missy we agree that Zimmerman should not have followed Martin. However you were claiming that his weight gave him a distinct advantage, I know from roughhousing and fighting that it does not.



I sort of take issue with your use of the word "know" here, considering we're not talking about your personal experience. We're talking about two people, neither of which are you.

LastSerenade

LastSerenade

Bensalem, PA
November 2003

MAR 27, 2012 08:37 AM

MissyMalice said:

Jamila said:

MissyMalice said:

Colinism said:
Missy, I will have to dissagree with you seeing as how I used to be that skinny, but I was athletic and I can easily see as a man that it is very possible for martin to effectively defend himself. If Zimmerman was all muscle then I would agree, but if it's just fat then it's hardly of any use against a taller opponent who has leverage.



We'll have to agree to disagree on that, considering there is no objective way to determine which one of them had an advantage in a physical altercation. Even so, none of that would have mattered if Zimmerman hadn't deliberately ignored the instructions he was given by police to not follow the boy.



I'd say the person with the obvious physical advantage would be the one with the gun, who was able to shoot and kill someone armed with skittles. In a bar fight, who knows? Or cares.



Well people are trying to argue that Trayvon might have overpowered Zimmerman to the point where he needed to use the gun to save his own life. Which I found doubtful, but it's not exactly something anyone can prove either way.




but see that's the thing, neither can be proven at this point, but they arent out of the realm of possibility


btw has anyone seen the CNN facebook page, it scares me what some people in this country believe

LastSerenade

LastSerenade

Bensalem, PA
November 2003

MAR 27, 2012 08:50 AM

also this was just posted
zoom image

if these numbers(year wise) are correct then the networks are doing a disservice to the public

Colinism

Colinism

Atlanta, GA
July 2005

MAR 27, 2012 08:54 AM

Also this has been disproven already. That is not trayvon in the second picture.

Colinism

Colinism

Atlanta, GA
July 2005

MAR 27, 2012 08:56 AM

Missy, you are the one who was saying that Martin is at a disadvantage due to being lighter. He was not necessarily so. We don't know what happened but weight does not automatically give you an advantage over another human as you were claiming.

motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

MAR 27, 2012 09:00 AM

Templar2749 said:
My point is you and several others appear to be choosing to believe every negative stereotype about Zimmerman and yet at the same time choose to believe that it's impossible that Trayvon was up to no good that night (I'm not saying that he was or wasn't, I don't have enough facts for that) or that at the time that Zimmerman pulled the trigger, he honestly felt in fear of his life.


Well, no kidding. Zimmerman's 911 tape makes it clear that Zimmerman was acting aggressively. Zimmerman's 911 tape indicates strongly that Zimmerman had a negative prejudice against black people--if the FBI comes back and says different, well, we'll revisit the issue, but I heard it clearly enough without prompting. The other 911 tapes indicate that Trayvon was not the aggressor in the incident, which follows with Zimmerman's own tape. But despite all that, we're supposed to believe that it's an open field? Even if you want to give Zimmerman the benefit of the doubt, the doubt that exists lies against Zimmerman, not Trayvon.

On the topic of prejudice, that Zimmerman had black friends and participated in black ministries doesn't really mean much. It's an indicator, sure, that he wasn't a flag-waving KKK member. But prejudice exists in much subtler shades than simply hate/no hate.

Colinism said:
Missy, you are the one who was saying that Martin is at a disadvantage due to being lighter. He was not necessarily so. We don't know what happened but weight does not automatically give you an advantage over another human as you were claiming.


It's more than possible for a lighter person to whoop the bejesus out of a heavier person. That doesn't mean that weight, even flab, isn't a major advantage in a fight. All else being equal, I'd take a pound advantage over a reach advantage any day.

MissyMalice

MissyMalice

USA
May 2010

MAR 27, 2012 09:07 AM

Colinism said:
Missy, you are the one who was saying that Martin is at a disadvantage due to being lighter. He was not necessarily so. We don't know what happened but weight does not automatically give you an advantage over another human as you were claiming.



I pointed out that Zimmerman was much larger that Trayvon. You're the one bringing your own personal experience into it and claiming that you know Zimmerman wouldn't have had a physical advantage. This is not a debate that will be settled; there is no objective way to determine who had an advantage at this point in time. I think based on the size difference that Zimmerman likely had the upper hand; you disagree. But stop trying to claim superior knowledge because you were once a similar size to Trayvon. That's ridiculous. I already said agree to disagree considering there will never be any evidence or proof on that specific issue, so it's ridiculous to continue trying to debate it with me.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8

 ... 21

Next