Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17

 ... 487

Next

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

USA
May 2006

APR 26, 2011 07:18 AM

Prepare for the inevitable -Loompa Apocalypse!!

Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX), the GOP congressman with "libertarian leanings, is expected to announce Tuesday in Des Moines that he's forming a presidential exploratory committee," The Des Moines Register writes.

mydogfarted

mydogfarted

Oakland, NJ
June 2003

APR 26, 2011 07:44 AM

Is anyone surprised? Maybe he can get his asshole son to be his running mate.

densifloris

densifloris

I'm lost
November 2010

APR 26, 2011 08:12 PM

How to explain your dead campaign to a dead hare:

zoom image

semiretiredpunk

semiretiredpunk

USA
March 2007

APR 26, 2011 08:17 PM

I liked Ron Paul a lot better than Sarah Palin or Donald Trump.
I know that's not saying a lot, but...

FreakPirate

FreakPirate

Canada
November 2002

APR 26, 2011 08:19 PM

semiretiredpunk said:
I liked Ron Paul a lot better than Sarah Palin or Donald Trump.
I know that's not saying a lot, but...



I like getting punched in the arm better than I like getting punched in the nuts or throat.

Canadian_Coat

Canadian_Coat

Brockville, ON
September 2008

APR 26, 2011 10:12 PM

I like it when bad stuff doesn't happen myself....

Rainer24

Rainer24

Chicago, IL
January 2008

APR 27, 2011 12:33 AM

I don't really care who they trot out to lose to Obama. They don't have anyone that can beat him and they know it. The thirty-three Senate seats up for grabs are more interesting/important, IMO, as the Republicans have a better than good change of regaining the majority there, at which point all kind of bad shit is going to happen for at least two years.

FellOnEarth

FellOnEarth

Temecula, CA
April 2006

APR 27, 2011 02:07 AM

Rainer24 said:
I don't really care who they trot out to lose to Obama. They don't have anyone that can beat him and they know it. The thirty-three Senate seats up for grabs are more interesting/important, IMO, as the Republicans have a better than good change of regaining the majority there, at which point all kind of bad shit is going to happen for at least two years.

I'm not so sure. While this could potentially be one outcome, I think it's just as likely that the Democrats maintain a (narrow) majority.

For one thing, Democratic and progressive organizations have decided to play the Republican's game (in the wake of the SCOTUS' Citizens United decision). That means there will be a hell of a lot more money being poured into unsupported media campaigns targeting incumbent Republicans an newcomer's alike. For another, the field of ultraconservative challengers likely to get elected in Republican primaries against Democratic incumbents might make a number of potential Republicans gag, that isn't to say that a few might slip through, after all, 33 is an awfully high number to defend.

I suppose it's really too early to speculate as anything can happen over the next year, in the end though I suspect it will come down to overall voter motivation and turnout. Hopefully people aren't completely disgusted with either party to the point of staying home (hey, they could always vote 3rd...) One thing I feel confident predicting though is that 2012 will be the most expensive year in political history ever.

Regarding Paul's presidential aspirations, all I can say is...

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

OH THE HUMANITY!zoom image


Rainer24

Rainer24

Chicago, IL
January 2008

APR 27, 2011 09:56 AM

FellOnEarth said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)


Rainer24 said:
I don't really care who they trot out to lose to Obama. They don't have anyone that can beat him and they know it. The thirty-three Senate seats up for grabs are more interesting/important, IMO, as the Republicans have a better than good change of regaining the majority there, at which point all kind of bad shit is going to happen for at least two years.

I'm not so sure. While this could potentially be one outcome, I think it's just as likely that the Democrats maintain a (narrow) majority.

For one thing, Democratic and progressive organizations have decided to play the Republican's game (in the wake of the SCOTUS' Citizens United decision). That means there will be a hell of a lot more money being poured into unsupported media campaigns targeting incumbent Republicans an newcomer's alike. For another, the field of ultraconservative challengers likely to get elected in Republican primaries against Democratic incumbents might make a number of potential Republicans gag, that isn't to say that a few might slip through, after all, 33 is an awfully high number to defend.

I suppose it's really too early to speculate as anything can happen over the next year, in the end though I suspect it will come down to overall voter motivation and turnout. Hopefully people aren't completely disgusted with either party to the point of staying home (hey, they could always vote 3rd...) One thing I feel confident predicting though is that 2012 will be the most expensive year in political history ever.

Regarding Paul's presidential aspirations, all I can say is...
[spoiler]
OH THE HUMANITY!zoom image


[/SPOILER]





I don't disagree that the Dems could end up maintaining a majority, but I suspect that it will end up very close either way, and as I said, the Senate races are the ones that deserve the most attention, as it is very important for people who traditionally vote against irrationality to get out and do so in 2012.

IDGAS

IDGAS

Jackson Heights, NY
March 2004

APR 27, 2011 05:39 PM

Can't they find any non-insane libertarians like former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson?