Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 487

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

14 | 15 | 16

Next

Canadian_Coat

Canadian_Coat

Brockville, ON
September 2008

JUN 17, 2011 08:41 PM

CONTRARIAN: a person who takes a contrary position or attitude

Alyeska

Alyeska

HOPEFUL

Englewood, CO

JUN 17, 2011 08:58 PM

As much as I don't want to feed the troll,

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

there would be NO legal way for me to see my husband were he injured while overseas and had to stay at the US Army hospital in Germany. I would not be contacted first, or within 24 hours of his injury or death, no matter how severe. Even if we had children. There are many ways in which I could not see him, speak to him, or help him as a soldier if we were not married.



/donefeeding

Calico

Calico

New Zealand
April 2007

JUN 17, 2011 08:59 PM

antichrist said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

wildswan said:

antichrist said:

Explain.




Well, since you asked and not demanded, and since you were so kind as to read through the thread and understood the cogent arguments contained within, I will:

-Lots of homosexuals "breed."

-*gasp* Many heterosexuals do not. Apparently, yourself included.

-Their are things that are seen as traditional that many people enjoy because they genuinely do, and not necessarily a blind following.

-Marriage is not about the so very optional ceremony, but about the very serious legal protections people who love another human being would like to afford each other because of the intimate nature of those bonds.

-Your characterizations of people "drinking the Kool-Aid," in the condescending way you did makes it seem like you think you think you are keeping company with a ship of fools, for which your entirely progressive views are so much more worthy of the idiots it has to share a world with.

-You make it seems like there is some codified rule that one must buy a diamond, and not only that, one must spend three months salary on it.



Also, for the freaking millionth time: NO ONE ANYWHERE HAS TO HAVE ANY TYPE OF WEDDING CEREMONY. MARRIAGE AND CEREMONY ARE DIFFERENT THINGS.




Thanks.

How do gay couples breed? They can adopt, and that's awesome. I suppose they could always do the surrogate thing, but that's just adding to the problem. The world is full of unwanted people of all ages why make more?

Agreed, and bless them for that decision.

I know, my questions is why. l just don't understand. That's why I ask, why marriage?

I'm sure I could go right now to a lawyer and have a letter drafted stating that my roommate (a man), has all decision making and execution of my asset capabilities afforded to a spouse in the case of my inability to do so. So what's the benefit to this particular legal arrangement?

I very much, think I am on a sinking ship of fools. Don't you?

Those are the very widely accepted terms of that tradition. Are they not?

I know, that's WHY I pose the alternative. The only thing that makes sense to me is that you want to celebrate your love in the company of other loved ones. What is the point of inviting judges and lawyers into your love life?

And I'd like to issue a blanket disclaimer. I in no way, mean to be rude or condescending, so if I do please accept my sincerest apologies. I think tone and body language go a long way to dispelling those feelings, and I just don't have those tools avail. to me in this forum.

And yes J24U, try leaving and see if judges and lawyers don't magically appear in your life.



I love it when people with privilege ask why those who are marginalized would want all the immense privilege they have, since they don't really appreciate it anyway. It's so awesome, and does nothing but make them sound smart and sensitive. No, really.

FellOnEarth

FellOnEarth

Temecula, CA
April 2006

JUN 17, 2011 09:11 PM

antichrist said:
How do gay couples breed? They can adopt, and that's awesome. I suppose they could always do the surrogate thing, but that's just adding to the problem. The world is full of unwanted people of all ages why make more?

I know, my questions is why. l just don't understand. That's why I ask, why marriage?


Newsflash, being gay isn't necessarily a binary or immediate orientation. Many people who've been married or had previous hetero relationships that, though they didn't last, produced children (such as I). Also, in vitro fertilization need not be for surrogate purposes only, lesbian couples may want to raise their own child and are perfectly capable of breeding, actually, they'd have double the capacity to carry a child. Additionally, fertility science has progressed to the point where it's possible for offspring to be produced from the combined genetics of two women and likely improvements in this field may one day make this a common and viable option.

As far as "contributing to the problem," I'd beg to differ. Millions of unplanned pregnancies happen all the time, but for same-sex couples, the choice of having children together is rarely unplanned (excepting rape, infidelity, or an open relationship - remember, some people are bi). The point is that decisions to plan a pregnancy are typically made by intelligent and financially secure couples who are able to provide a stable environment for raising a child. I'd also venture to say that they wouldn't be likely to have more than one or two children, and that such children are likely to be raised with a level of sexual awareness disinclining them to have many children as well.

Why marriage? I think enough people have already answered that question, I suggest you read their comments. If you don't agree with or understand their reasoning, fine, but just because you find the practice of marriage antiquated and unnecessary doesn't mean they'll agree with you either.

I can understand some arguments against marriage (many end up in divorce, some people are afraid of commitment or legal obligations, don't want any pressure to have children, etc.), yet I haven't seen any of these arguments being made by you. So far it's just been about your perception that marriage invites lawyers and judges into people's bedrooms, that being married leads to breeding (some married couples choose to not have children by the way), and that people need to spend a bunch of money on a blood diamond adorned ring (was this comment even necessary?).

Arguments about marriage aside, I get that you choose not participate in the status quo of society and are anti-marriage, anti-holiday, etc. You're an exceptional individual, however your opinions are your own and despite your disagreements, I've failed to see any valid reasons for them.

Bear in mind that this topic is about Proposition 8, an unconstitutional and discriminatory law that prevents citizens from exercising the rights and freedoms commonly enjoyed by others. Many of us disagree with this law and are focused on seeing it and other similar laws repealed or struck down in the courts. In fact, your opinionated views about marriage in general are somewhat like those who would deny same-sex couples the right to marry and distract from the more pressing debate at hand. Wouldn't you agree that despite one's personal choice to not engage in the liberties enjoyed by most, that others should not be denied such liberties simply because they are somehow different?

Canadian_Coat

Canadian_Coat

Brockville, ON
September 2008

JUN 17, 2011 09:22 PM

+1

Stiles

Stiles

Oakland, CA
November 2002

JUN 18, 2011 12:13 AM

Calico said:

antichrist said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

wildswan said:

antichrist said:

Explain.




Well, since you asked and not demanded, and since you were so kind as to read through the thread and understood the cogent arguments contained within, I will:

-Lots of homosexuals "breed."

-*gasp* Many heterosexuals do not. Apparently, yourself included.

-Their are things that are seen as traditional that many people enjoy because they genuinely do, and not necessarily a blind following.

-Marriage is not about the so very optional ceremony, but about the very serious legal protections people who love another human being would like to afford each other because of the intimate nature of those bonds.

-Your characterizations of people "drinking the Kool-Aid," in the condescending way you did makes it seem like you think you think you are keeping company with a ship of fools, for which your entirely progressive views are so much more worthy of the idiots it has to share a world with.

-You make it seems like there is some codified rule that one must buy a diamond, and not only that, one must spend three months salary on it.



Also, for the freaking millionth time: NO ONE ANYWHERE HAS TO HAVE ANY TYPE OF WEDDING CEREMONY. MARRIAGE AND CEREMONY ARE DIFFERENT THINGS.




Thanks.

How do gay couples breed? They can adopt, and that's awesome. I suppose they could always do the surrogate thing, but that's just adding to the problem. The world is full of unwanted people of all ages why make more?

Agreed, and bless them for that decision.

I know, my questions is why. l just don't understand. That's why I ask, why marriage?

I'm sure I could go right now to a lawyer and have a letter drafted stating that my roommate (a man), has all decision making and execution of my asset capabilities afforded to a spouse in the case of my inability to do so. So what's the benefit to this particular legal arrangement?

I very much, think I am on a sinking ship of fools. Don't you?

Those are the very widely accepted terms of that tradition. Are they not?

I know, that's WHY I pose the alternative. The only thing that makes sense to me is that you want to celebrate your love in the company of other loved ones. What is the point of inviting judges and lawyers into your love life?

And I'd like to issue a blanket disclaimer. I in no way, mean to be rude or condescending, so if I do please accept my sincerest apologies. I think tone and body language go a long way to dispelling those feelings, and I just don't have those tools avail. to me in this forum.

And yes J24U, try leaving and see if judges and lawyers don't magically appear in your life.



I love it when people with privilege ask why those who are marginalized would want all the immense privilege they have, since they don't really appreciate it anyway. It's so awesome, and does nothing but make them sound smart and sensitive. No, really.



Plus fucking one, and said better than I could.

Sid

Sid

SUICIDEGIRL

Colorado, USA

JUN 18, 2011 02:15 AM

antichrist said:
I, in no way, meant to imply that gay people deserve less protection under the law than breeders. Truth be told I am much more a fan of gay couples because they don't breed. I really just can't understand why a group as outside society as homosexuals, wants so badly to play their game. I'll never be married not because I won't love someone enough, but because I don't drink the Kool-Aid. I don't do Valentine's or Christmas or marriage, and your certainly never getting 3 months salary dropped on a rock that African miners had to die for, so that American traders get richer off the exploitation of more poor people. Why is clinging desperately to tired traditions so desirable to some?



WTF? I'm married, happily, and have not seen a lawyer or a judge over that fact. I also haven't "bred", so my husband and I aren't these "breeders" you speak of (not to mention, I can't have my own children). There's happiness and love in many marriages, why should it matter if those happen between the same sex? There's no "kool-aid" to be had with commitment. Sometimes people just want to afford the luxury of being in love and sharing their lives.

Oh, and I FUCKING love my no-conflict diamonds, so back off!

wildswan

wildswan

I'm lost
June 2006

JUN 18, 2011 04:41 AM

wildswan said:

-TheirThere are things that are seen as traditional that many people enjoy because they genuinely do, and not necessarily a blind following.



For crying out loud. Sorry about the typo.

PointBlank

PointBlank

New York, NY
November 2004

JUN 18, 2011 09:13 AM

antichrist said:
I, in no way, meant to imply that gay people deserve less protection under the law than breeders. Truth be told I am much more a fan of gay couples because they don't breed. I really just can't understand why a group as outside society as homosexuals, wants so badly to play their game. I'll never be married not because I won't love someone enough, but because I don't drink the Kool-Aid. I don't do Valentine's or Christmas or marriage, and your certainly never getting 3 months salary dropped on a rock that African miners had to die for, so that American traders get richer off the exploitation of more poor people. Why is clinging desperately to tired traditions so desirable to some?



You don't "do" marriage? Why, because you already did?

Antichrist

Antichrist

Phoenix, AZ
November 2008

JUN 18, 2011 09:19 AM

Pardon me. Added the essentially. Together 14 years, never married, blah blah blah (like it's any of your business.)

FellOnEarth is right, I have derailed the prop 8 conversation enough. I'm done. I apologize.

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

USA
May 2006

JUN 18, 2011 12:18 PM

wildswan said:

wildswan said:

-TheirThere are things that are seen as traditional that many people enjoy because they genuinely do, and not necessarily a blind following.



For crying out loud. Sorry about the typo.



Get. The. Ducks.

Necia

Necia

San Francisco, CA
August 2005

JUN 18, 2011 01:30 PM

J24U said:

antichrist said:

J24U said:

antichrist said:

I think it would be more appropriate and probably easier to get the shitty tax laws revised.



Easier to try and pass bills that would change hundreds of laws around the country to make things equal, as opposed to just making gay marriage legal and accomplishing the same thing?



Maybe, maybe not. Y'alls answers are operating from the framework given to you, I'm asking to take a step back and ask essence questions like "Why is inviting lawyers into your hearts & bedrooms desirable?"



I've been married for about a year now, and you know, not once have I found a lawyer under my bed or in the closet. Not once.


And conversely, I've never been married and I find lawyers in my bed all the time. False correlation, buddy!

What I do know is that because I have a legal marriage license I can rely on the law to protect me or my wife in many situations that could happen to me or my wife. This same level of protection and safety was not extended to many of the gay couples I have known, including individuals who lost everything after a partner died and they found themselves with no legal claim to the life they built together once they were shut out by their dead partner's familiy.

There is no more government involvement in my life than there was before I was married. No big brother, no snooping lawyers. And not once do I think of the legal aspects of my marriage unless I find myself in a conversation like this. There's no lawyers in my bedroom or my heart, just love for my wife.


Thank you.

What a preposterous argument. "What I'd like to know is, why should we invite having laws, about things, affect us in any way? Fuck laws, man! And things! Fuck those, too!" whatever

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

JUN 18, 2011 02:09 PM

I would just like to address this tangent by noting that having lawyers in ones' bedroom is not necessarily a bad thing. Ahem.

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

USA
May 2006

JUN 18, 2011 04:55 PM

Subrosa said:
I would just like to address this tangent by noting that having lawyers in ones' bedroom is not necessarily a bad thing. Ahem.



I told you NO!!!

Tadzi

Tadzi

Greeley, CO
April 2003

JUN 18, 2011 06:18 PM

Coyotemike said:

wildswan said:

wildswan said:

-TheirThere are things that are seen as traditional that many people enjoy because they genuinely do, and not necessarily a blind following.



For crying out loud. Sorry about the typo.



Get. The. Ducks.



Otoki

Otoki

SUICIDEGIRL

Minnesota, USA

JUN 19, 2011 04:17 PM

Sid said:

antichrist said:
I, in no way, meant to imply that gay people deserve less protection under the law than breeders. Truth be told I am much more a fan of gay couples because they don't breed. I really just can't understand why a group as outside society as homosexuals, wants so badly to play their game. I'll never be married not because I won't love someone enough, but because I don't drink the Kool-Aid. I don't do Valentine's or Christmas or marriage, and your certainly never getting 3 months salary dropped on a rock that African miners had to die for, so that American traders get richer off the exploitation of more poor people. Why is clinging desperately to tired traditions so desirable to some?



WTF? I'm married, happily, and have not seen a lawyer or a judge over that fact. I also haven't "bred", so my husband and I aren't these "breeders" you speak of (not to mention, I can't have my own children). There's happiness and love in many marriages, why should it matter if those happen between the same sex? There's no "kool-aid" to be had with commitment. Sometimes people just want to afford the luxury of being in love and sharing their lives.

Oh, and I FUCKING love my no-conflict diamonds, so back off!


To add to this: I'm getting married this weekend, and there WILL be a judge present! Why? Because we see marriage as both a legal and social contract and think it's cool that we could have a judge marry us in a quick secular non-romantic ceremony. Then we're partying with a bunch of friends and relatives, because marriage is also a social contract that we are publicizing to our loved ones.

He didn't propose, I did. We're not doing any sort of procession, bridesmaids, groomsmen, etc. We're both keeping our names. Our vows are devoid of gender-bias. We have, in fact, avoided many traditional expectations of what a wedding should be in favor of what we want OUR wedding to be: a secular celebration of a new step in our relationship that WE chose to take for legal reasons.

Neither of us think everyone should be married, and neither of us think it's wrong for people to be together without marriage. HOWEVER, we are actually going to Pride the next day because we strongly believe that gay people who wish to be married should be able to do so, as traditionally or non-traditionally as they damned well fucking please.

To sit there and judge people who choose marriage just because YOU don't choose it is just as obnoxious as a religious person lamenting those damning themselves to hellfire because they don't live their lives the way said religious person does.

Clidna

Clidna

Canada
January 2005

JUN 19, 2011 07:46 PM

Well said, and congrats, Otoki.

Calico

Calico

New Zealand
April 2007

JUN 19, 2011 08:34 PM

Clidna said:
Well said, and congrats, Otoki.



+1

But I think it's kind of sad that a troll has managed to make this a thread about straight people defending their marriages, instead of gay people's right to marry. frown

Otoki

Otoki

SUICIDEGIRL

Minnesota, USA

JUN 20, 2011 12:26 AM

Calico said:

Clidna said:
Well said, and congrats, Otoki.



+1

But I think it's kind of sad that a troll has managed to make this a thread about straight people defending their marriages, instead of gay people's right to marry. frown



Meh, it's more like people, queer and otherwise, defending EVERYONE'S right to marry if they so choose. Let's also remember that a hetero marriage doesn't mean the parties involved are necessarily straight. Ahemwink

J24U

J24U

Danvers, MA
February 2006

JUN 20, 2011 12:56 AM

Otoki said:

Calico said:

Clidna said:
Well said, and congrats, Otoki.



+1

But I think it's kind of sad that a troll has managed to make this a thread about straight people defending their marriages, instead of gay people's right to marry. frown



Meh, it's more like people, queer and otherwise, defending EVERYONE'S right to marry if they so choose. Let's also remember that a hetero marriage doesn't mean the parties involved are necessarily straight. Ahemwink



True, this thread also made me really think some more on how absolutely narrow-minded so much of this country is regarding the traditions of a wedding and the grief one is likely to encounter from some relatives and friends when your wedding strays even slightly away from their ideas of "how it should be".

I was married by a good friend in a secular wedding ceremony while we were all dressed like pirates. My wife and I agreed to get married in a casual conversation one day; no grand proposal or engagement ring. And our wedding rings are just simple, hard to damage titanium bands (which says more to me as a symbol of our marriage than some huge gawdy jewel). Happily, most people had the good taste to withhold any comments or ctiticisms (at least around me), but I know there were more people that were a little uneasy with the events than spoke up about it. I was kind of hoping some people would speak their minds to me, I wanted to ask them where my pirate wedding ranked on the "Sanctity of Marriage" scale of 1-10; 1 being a huge cathedral-style ceremony with a full Mass at the beginning and 10 being "The gays are ruining it for all of us!!!11"

Canadian_Coat

Canadian_Coat

Brockville, ON
September 2008

JUN 20, 2011 01:03 AM

J24U said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

Otoki said:

Calico said:

Clidna said:
Well said, and congrats, Otoki.



+1

But I think it's kind of sad that a troll has managed to make this a thread about straight people defending their marriages, instead of gay people's right to marry. frown



Meh, it's more like people, queer and otherwise, defending EVERYONE'S right to marry if they so choose. Let's also remember that a hetero marriage doesn't mean the parties involved are necessarily straight. Ahemwink




True, this thread also made me really think some more on how absolutely narrow-minded so much of this country is regarding the traditions of a wedding and the grief one is likely to encounter from some relatives and friends when your wedding strays even slightly away from their ideas of "how it should be".

I was married by a good friend in a secular wedding ceremony while we were all dressed like pirates. My wife and I agreed to get married in a casual conversation one day; no grand proposal or engagement ring. And our wedding rings are just simple, hard to damage titanium bands (which says more to me as a symbol of our marriage than some huge gawdy jewel). Happily, most people had the good taste to withhold any comments or ctiticisms (at least around me), but I know there were more people that were a little uneasy with the events than spoke up about it. I was kind of hoping some people would speak their minds to me, I wanted to ask them where my pirate wedding ranked on the "Sanctity of Marriage" scale of 1-10; 1 being a huge cathedral-style ceremony with a full Mass at the beginning and 10 being "The gays are ruining it for all of us!!!11"


9 is now "The gays are ruining it for all of us!!" and 10 is now "Pirate Wedding" tongue

Seriously though, I think its awesome

Canadian_Coat

Canadian_Coat

Brockville, ON
September 2008

FEB 07, 2012 03:53 PM

California same-sex marriage ban deemed unconstitutional

Cash

Cash

USA
OLD SKOOL

FEB 07, 2012 04:34 PM

Of those who are against same-sex marriage....one of the most common themes I see in their dissent is a resentment towards what they call "the gay agenda". As if their fight is somehow disingenuous because they have an agenda....or that having an agenda is a BAD thing. Of COURSE they have an agenda. They want the same rights as everyone else...and their agenda is to achieve that.

semiretiredpunk

semiretiredpunk

USA
March 2007

FEB 07, 2012 05:49 PM

Canadian_Coat said:
California same-sex marriage ban deemed unconstitutional



Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

14 | 15 | 16

Next