Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46

 ... 495

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

nicole_powers

nicole_powers

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

JUL 28, 2009 05:56 PM

Addiction first took hold of Richard Farrell after a torn knee put an end to hopes of a professional athletics career. That same injury started his relationship with pain medication. One thing led to another, as these things do, and by the time he reached thirty Farrell had succumbed to almost every aspect of the heroin lifestyle.

His journey to redemption is chronicled in his new memoir, What's Left of Us. Farrell was one of the lucky ones; after twenty failed attempts, he slayed his dragon at a run-down, state-funded detox clinic in Massachusetts, and went on to fulfill his potential as an author, journalist, teacher, filmmaker and screenwriter.

Many addicts will not be so fortunate. Clinics such as these are the easy victims of budget cuts. As bankrupt states struggle to pick up the incarceration tab for the collateral damage of the War on Drugs, and our federal government goes deeper into debt to pay for its War on (drug-funded) Terror, Farrell's life experience leads him to pose an important question: Have we forgotten the simple laws of supply and demand? By funding these two never-ending wars are we ineffectually treating the symptoms instead of battling the cause? Wouldn't our money be better spent reducing the demand for drugs?

The state-funded treatment of drug addiction has never been a vote-winning cause (just look at the tap dancing Obama was forced to do recently on the prickly issue of needle exchange programs). Here, in this special guest column, Farrell makes the case for a more enlightened drug (and healthcare) policy and talks of the horrors that will likely transpire if we continue on our current course, which is tantamount to treating cancer with a gold-plated plaster -- ridiculous, ineffectual, expensive and ultimately fatal.




Richard Farrell: The Two Hour Orgasm

I took heroin only once. But for three years, heroin took me to anyplace it wanted to. I stole, robbed, hustled, and did whatever was necessary to keep a 10-bag-a-day habit in full throttle.

Heroin is amazing. It is the devil. Heroin is like riding the peak of an orgasm for hours. It sucks you in, removes all your doubt and fears in a heartbeat. In less than three seconds, its warm snake grabs onto your heart and sets you free. I've been clean for over 22 years. But not one day goes by that I do not remember the mighty power of heroin's ensnare.

Back then, to most, I was a scumbag junkie who should have been locked up. The majority of people in America believe addiction is a moral issue. Sadly, the current administration's policy is a shadow of those beliefs.

President Obama has failed to confront the issue of free and immediate health care for all addicts seeking help. This is not only an egregious oversight but arguably an error that has the potentiality to crumble America from within.

Recently, President Obama created a four point plan of attack. First up on his agenda will be an all out effort to crackdown on drug use in our cities and towns. Next he'll be sending an increased, unspecified amount of US Border Patrol Agents to facilitate his third point of action. For the first time ever, the US Border Patrol will be conducting inspections of all trains and cars exiting the United States. And finally, Obama released $59 million to Homeland Security for immediate execution in the war against drugs.

On paper it appears to be a comprehensive attack. But the goal of reducing drug use in America and thereby decreasing demand of illegal drugs entering from Mexico will not be effective without an emergency health care plan that allows access to rehabilitation hospitals for drug addicts seeking recovery. There simply are not enough jails in America to hold the mounting numbers of drug addicts. Those suffering from this addiction only have two choices every morning -- repeat or recover.

Recently, the New York Times ran a story about Dana Smith, a mother who had just lost her son to heroin. The facts are gruesome, horrific. This was Dana Smith's third son lost to a heroin overdose. She said her boys "fell like dominoes."

But what strikes me is the location of where her kids died. Not in New York City, Detroit, Miami, or Los Angeles, but on the streets of Grove City, Ohio, in the heartland of America.

Heroin is back. The Federal Drug Administration has no way of adequately policing the vast network of crisscrossing highways in Middle America. Drug-traffickers understand their advantage here and are mounting an all out war for control of America's suburbs.

But there is another large ingredient to add to this potpourri. The fucking wheels have come off the United States economy. From coast to coast, fear, unemployment, crime, and mental depression have reached all-time highs.

And heroin is the perfect answer. It doesn't matter if you're a teenager whose parents have lost their jobs and homes. Or you're a returning soldier who has seen shit nobody should ever remember. Heroin, with its seductive magic, will free all from the uncertainties our future holds.

And the Taliban leadership in Afghanistan is mindfully aware of heroin's effect on the youth in the United States. In 2007, they earned $300 million from Afghan poppy farms. Most people fear the insurgence of the Taliban and their poppy farm profits which they're using to fund terrorism around the world. But President Obama and his administration are being fooled. The Taliban are after our youth and nobody on Capitol Hill has a clue.

They have forgotten about Virgil's epic poem The Aeneid. During the ten years of a failed siege on Troy, the Greeks built a large wooden horse in the darkness of night. One day the Greeks pretended to sail away and the Trojans pulled the horse into their city as a victory prize. However, inside were members of the Greek army who opened the gates. The Greek army retuned and destroyed Troy.

Heroin is our Trojan horse. You see, when I shot heroin it was $30 a bag. Today, because Afghanistan produces 90% of poppy seeds around the world, it is $5 a bag.

Any fuckin' questions?!

Bottom line, President Obama must confront the ever increasing popularity of heroin in America's heartland. We need to focus more tax dollars on free comprehensive health care. It is quite simple; the demand for heroin is increasing daily. The Taliban has the supply, the economy is spiraling downward, and hundreds of American kids are reaching out for euphoria.

Each and every new heroin addict is in search of that two-hour orgasm, but by the time heroin is finished, it will rob them of their souls. In the end, heroin will leave them and their families with nothing but pain, anguish, and death.

Mr. President, I personally do not know one single heroin addict with health insurance.



Richard Farrell is an author, filmmaker, teacher, journalist, and adjunct professor of English at the University of Massachusetts in Lowell. His documentary, High on Crack Street, was aired on HBO and received Columbia University's duPont Award. His memoir, What's Left of Us, published by Citadel Press, is out now. He is the screenwriter for the upcoming film The Fighter, which stars Christian Bale and Mark Wahlberg.


Fatality

Fatality

SUICIDEGIRL

USA

JUL 29, 2009 10:15 AM

So excited to read this...this is my area of academic research (recidivism to opiate use)!

Fatality

Fatality

SUICIDEGIRL

USA

JUL 29, 2009 10:25 AM

state funded detox clinic in Massachusetts, and went on to fulfill his potential as an author, journalist, teacher and screenwriter.

Many addicts will not be so fortunate. Clinics such as these are the easy victims of budget cuts.



I just want to point out that I am the number one fan of therapeutic rather than punitive intervention, but there are a lot of misconceptions about detox. Mainly that they work. Detox works very very infrequently to change someone's lifestyle unless they're couple with substitution medication, long-term treatment programs, etc. And even then... They're okay as stepping stones, but usually are a revolving door that people know don't work.

There simply are not enough jails in America to hold the mounting numbers of drug addicts. Those suffering from this addiction only have two choices every morning -- repeat or recover.


Very true, but there also aren't enough hospital or program beds, either. And plenty of addicts use them to lower their tolerance or recuperate when they run out of money.
We need more funding into beds, but we also need a lot more funding into researching recovery and intervention methods for people who want them. Imagine detoxing and then having to go back to the streets until a long-term program opens up!
[We need suboxone doctors able to prescribe more than a hundred people at a time!]
It's a difficult position because saying "free and immediate health care for all addicts seeking help" is that means free and immediate health care for all addicts seeking help with recovery, with "three hots and a cot", or whatever their reasons are. This does not mean turning people away, but does mean recognizing the complexity of the issue. A lot of people just don't want to stop, don't want to change the lifestyle, whatever, so that needs to be recognized.
Also, certain programs require methadone maintenance after a certain number of failed detoxes.

it is $5 a bag.


or lower!

by the time heroin is finished, it will rob them of their souls.


though I know a lot of addicts feel and say this, I feel like public statements like this often work to perpetuate negative stigma of the addict as less than human, which, in turn, propagates negative policy implications.

Anyways, thanks for this great article. Hopefully my funded research can eventually make some headway in this; I come at it from the perspective of qualitatively involving the addicts' perspectives in their own views on the matters...what is helpful and harmful, hopeful or disrespectful for them.

Fatality

Fatality

SUICIDEGIRL

USA

JUL 29, 2009 10:41 AM

And yes yes yes underlying all of this is just the basic point that the health care system needs to be revamped for everyone!

Gadget

Gadget

SUICIDEGIRL

New Hampshire, USA

JUL 29, 2009 11:53 AM

Thank you for your comments Fatality. I read the article and was very intrigued by it and your comments only helped educate me further.

nicole_powers

nicole_powers

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

JUL 29, 2009 12:09 PM

One of my favorite comedians and authors, Ben Elton, wrote an amazing novel about the connection between social drugs, organized crime and terrorism called High Society.

Through the book's often hilarious satire, Elton points out the hypocrisy of our ozone friendly, PETA supporting, vegetarian celebs, who in turn support all manner of human atrocities via their très fashionable -- and expensive -- drug habits.

(Another reason we should legalize pot -- you can't fund terrorism through drugs if you're merely smoking something you grew in your back garden.)

nicole_powers

nicole_powers

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

JUL 29, 2009 12:11 PM

Ps. Thanks for the great comments and insight Fatality.

Gringo

Gringo

Spokane, WA
May 2006

JUL 29, 2009 12:16 PM

by the time heroin is finished, it will rob them of their souls.


This is probably one of the major reasons I'd never try this drug. I don't think for one second it would be worth the risk of addiction. I cannot fathom what it would be like to be addicted.

I have one friend who is a recovering heroin addict - but not even a long-term addict at that. Her ex-boyfriend was a dealer and she got into it for a month before he got busted and she was arrested with him.

She is on medication and in counseling but that is a state program she is on. She stopped because she didn't want to die. She felt that addiction growing every single day since she started it and looking back at it scares the fuck out of her.

I prefer being able to pick and choose what drugs I use and when I use them instead of the other way around. I am pretty selective on what I try and what I will use. As for heroin, even after knowing how addicting it is, I have thought that I would try it if I only had a month or so left to live.

ChrisSick

ChrisSick

Philadelphia, PA
March 2008

JUL 29, 2009 12:52 PM

While I'm not indifferent to the plight of addicts everywhere, first & foremost I'd like to point out that not everyone who uses heroin is or becomes an addict. Its just a moralistic scare-tactic horseshit to stereotype drug users as all being worth thieving junkies. I've snorted, swallowed, & shot opiates of every type, from low dosage pharmaceutical pain medication to powdered & black tar street heroin. I've been using heroin on & off for about ten years now & the worst withdrawl symptoms I've ever experienced is mild headaches & soreness after a binge. I've never been late on a bill or had to sell or steal anything to buy drugs. Even close friends of mine who have struggled with actual addiction defy the typical stereotype. A very close friend managed to get himself addicted to pain pills, recently, & was occasionally shooting up. In the course of their six months of addiction they spent about $24,000 on drugs, roughly two grand a month. This person didn't put themselves in serious physical danger (read: never scored on the street), didn't rob anyone, steal from anyone, or miss any bills. The worst thing that came out of it was the money he spent, friction in his romantic relationship, & eventually-- two months after getting clean-- he lost his job due to chronic lateness, due in part to being high often.

All that said, when it comes to treating those who are addicts, both the author & Fatality make very valid points. There's not much in the way of treatment for those who do wish to change their lifestyles & get clean, detoxifying isn't enough if the person isn't also receiving counseling & treatment. The issue is incredibly complex, & treating it is very difficult given the limited nature of our understanding of addiction.

The best answer is still the simplest: legalize it. There's a study I'm currently having a difficult time locating with regards to what happens to the lives of addicts when they are prescribed heroin. The short version is that they become more stable, are removed from possibly harmful environments (street scoring), less likely to engage in criminal practices to fund their use, being to lower the amount of drugs they're using, and a few of those studied even managed to get steady jobs.

Using heroin is dangerous enough, there's constant danger of being robbed or arrested, & since no regulation exists, you never know what you're buying off the street. About three years back I was buying off the street in Philadelphia when heroin cut with fentanyl started floating around, resulting in a wave of overdoses & deaths. The deaths reached out into the surrounding suburbs, since modern heroin is potent enough to be snorted (injection became popular due to low quality heroin, mainlining was the only way to get high) & use has become more casual among teenagers. The response was sadly typical, under pressure from news media & grieving families the police vowed to crack down. For the record, the best know drug corner in Philadelphia has been a well known & active spot for at least twenty-five years. I've been picked up scoring during one of the periodic sweeps. The police make a big show of picking up a handful of dealers & users, & the next day new crews set up shop & users know they can still count on shit being available.

Legalizing drugs-- all drugs-- would reduce harm for hardcore addicts & casual users alike, while at the same time allowing those who are addicted to seek treatment with less stigma, it could also go a long way to making it easier to discern the people taking a break from those that are serious about changing their lifestyles.

reshizzle

reshizzle

Australia
April 2006

JUL 29, 2009 03:36 PM

thanks for linking this article in chemical halo, fatality.
I'm currently reading a book called 'Poppy', life, death and addiction inside Afghanistan's opium trade but will look for Richard Farrell's to read next

Gringo

Gringo

Spokane, WA
May 2006

JUL 29, 2009 04:38 PM

ChrisSick said:
Legalizing drugs-- all drugs-- would reduce harm for hardcore addicts & casual users alike, while at the same time allowing those who are addicted to seek treatment with less stigma, it could also go a long way to making it easier to discern the people taking a break from those that are serious about changing their lifestyles.


Chris, this solution has always made sense to me. I mean really - there is no other possible or likely solution that makes sense.

Applying the same usage laws for the drug "alcohol" and applying them to all drugs makes the most sense.

The problem is, too many people still think that this war on drugs will somehow be won. They also think that by being selective on legalization (example: pot should be illegal but nothing else, blah blah blah), it will keep people from doing other drugs.

It's weird that people can be very logical when it comes to other sorts of social issues and addressing both the problem and solutions/preventions. In the case of minors becoming pregnant or getting STDs - many people finally "get" the fact that the abstinence-only campaigns have proven that they aren't as effective as once hoped. Most understood and accepted that a different approach had to be taken through education and passing out condoms.

If the issue of teenage pregnancies/STDs was handled the same way as the war on drugs are, there would be a "War on Underage Sex" that just had more and more money thrown into the abstinence-only campaign/war. I think most can agree that it would be a very Why can't that same reasoning be used when it comes to drugs?

nicole_powers

nicole_powers

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

JUL 29, 2009 05:34 PM

I agree with the previous posts: in an ideal world all drugs should be legal.

I don't indulge myself, but would fight for the right for others to do so. On principle I believe that one should be allowed to do anything with one's own body as long as it doesn't hurt others.

However, being pragmatic, pot is the most likely drug to be made legal. Perhaps in doing so, it would serve as a gateway to a less hysterical and more enlightened approach to drugs in general.

In the meantime I'd like to encourage those who can to stop patronizing those who fund inhuman behavior (don't kid yourself about where your drug money goes). It's the same reason I don't shop at Wal Mart -- buy a toaster from there and somewhere along the line you'll be funding some pretty evil shit.

Otoki

Otoki

SUICIDEGIRL

Minnesota, USA

JUL 29, 2009 05:34 PM

ChrisSick said:
While I'm not indifferent to the plight of addicts everywhere, first & foremost I'd like to point out that not everyone who uses heroin is or becomes an addict. Its just a moralistic scare-tactic horseshit to stereotype drug users as all being worth thieving junkies. I've snorted, swallowed, & shot opiates of every type, from low dosage pharmaceutical pain medication to powdered & black tar street heroin. I've been using heroin on & off for about ten years now & the worst withdrawl symptoms I've ever experienced is mild headaches & soreness after a binge. I've never been late on a bill or had to sell or steal anything to buy drugs. Even close friends of mine who have struggled with actual addiction defy the typical stereotype. A very close friend managed to get himself addicted to pain pills, recently, & was occasionally shooting up. In the course of their six months of addiction they spent about $24,000 on drugs, roughly two grand a month. This person didn't put themselves in serious physical danger (read: never scored on the street), didn't rob anyone, steal from anyone, or miss any bills. The worst thing that came out of it was the money he spent, friction in his romantic relationship, & eventually-- two months after getting clean-- he lost his job due to chronic lateness, due in part to being high often.

All that said, when it comes to treating those who are addicts, both the author & Fatality make very valid points. There's not much in the way of treatment for those who do wish to change their lifestyles & get clean, detoxifying isn't enough if the person isn't also receiving counseling & treatment. The issue is incredibly complex, & treating it is very difficult given the limited nature of our understanding of addiction.

The best answer is still the simplest: legalize it. There's a study I'm currently having a difficult time locating with regards to what happens to the lives of addicts when they are prescribed heroin. The short version is that they become more stable, are removed from possibly harmful environments (street scoring), less likely to engage in criminal practices to fund their use, being to lower the amount of drugs they're using, and a few of those studied even managed to get steady jobs.

Using heroin is dangerous enough, there's constant danger of being robbed or arrested, & since no regulation exists, you never know what you're buying off the street. About three years back I was buying off the street in Philadelphia when heroin cut with fentanyl started floating around, resulting in a wave of overdoses & deaths. The deaths reached out into the surrounding suburbs, since modern heroin is potent enough to be snorted (injection became popular due to low quality heroin, mainlining was the only way to get high) & use has become more casual among teenagers. The response was sadly typical, under pressure from news media & grieving families the police vowed to crack down. For the record, the best know drug corner in Philadelphia has been a well known & active spot for at least twenty-five years. I've been picked up scoring during one of the periodic sweeps. The police make a big show of picking up a handful of dealers & users, & the next day new crews set up shop & users know they can still count on shit being available.

Legalizing drugs-- all drugs-- would reduce harm for hardcore addicts & casual users alike, while at the same time allowing those who are addicted to seek treatment with less stigma, it could also go a long way to making it easier to discern the people taking a break from those that are serious about changing their lifestyles.


You and Fatality make many great points. I've always felt uneasy about legalizing heroin, but I also read a study (I think it was in England, will search) about how legalizing and regulating heroin made many of the socially negative issues decrease.

ChrisSick

ChrisSick

Philadelphia, PA
March 2008

JUL 29, 2009 05:47 PM

Its amazing to me how often people are willing to let ideology trump pragmatism. The War on Drugs has become a defacto war of poverty, creating an underground economy for those who don't have mainstream educational & job opportunities to profit through illegal means, resulting in uncountable amounts of lost productivity, lives, dollars, & property. Drug paraphernalia laws which were designed to punish drug users-- even if they had no actual drugs on them-- encouraged needle sharing, which caused the rate of blood borne diseases, including HIV, to explode. As I mentioned previously the lack of consistency of street drugs-- due to no regulation-- means that the vast majority of deaths results from accidental overdoses. The illegal nature of usage means that addicts aren't protected, they can be fired from a job despite no performance issues, they can be arrested while scoring, even if they're guilty of no other crime, & certainly if there were ever anything resembling a victimless crime, drug use is about as close as it can be. Worse, the War on Drugs is totally unsustainable, US citizens are funding both sides of the drug war, imagine if during WWII for every Liberty Bond a citizen bought they spent an equal amount funding the Axis powers. And while we give up more ground every year, we're filling our prisons with non-violent offenders that we have jammed our prisons to overcrowding. The collateral damage from can't even be measured, & all possible negative effects-- such as increased healthcare costs, which we're already paying-- are clearly outweighed by the negative effects we're already experiencing. I'd like to think the only reason our current President isn't taking a hard position on this is due to the politics & public perception. Which is basically the hypocritical viewpoint of many Americans that drinking five scotches with dinner should be okay, but being caught with a gram of marijuana on you should result in having your entire life ruined.

Fatality

Fatality

SUICIDEGIRL

USA

JUL 29, 2009 06:08 PM

Decriminalization is also an option

ChrisSick

ChrisSick

Philadelphia, PA
March 2008

JUL 29, 2009 06:14 PM

nicole_powers said:
In the meantime I'd like to encourage those who can to stop patronizing those who fund inhuman behavior (don't kid yourself about where your drug money goes). It's the same reason I don't shop at Wal Mart -- buy a toaster from there and somewhere along the line you'll be funding some pretty evil shit.



That's the most disconcerting thing for me about my illegal drug use. The vast majority of my use has been in the form of illegally obtained pharmaceuticals, which still supports some pretty awful corporations, but I find it a lot less detestable than supporting murderers & slavers. Its something people should think about, I've been around the drug scene enough to know that the higher you go up the ladder, even harmless drugs like marijuana are supplied by some pretty dangerous, scummy people, & that's just stateside, it doesn't even begin to get into the issues of how that supply is harvested & gets into the country-- including drug mules pressed into service-- or who is profiting the most from that.

Drugs are like any other kind of consumable. If you're going to spend your dollars on it, you should educate yourself as much as possible about where those dollars go & who profits from it. Sadly, due to the illegality of drugs, the people that profit tend to be the bad people.

ChrisSick

ChrisSick

Philadelphia, PA
March 2008

JUL 29, 2009 06:14 PM

Fatality said:
Decriminalization is also an option



To my mind it is the only viable option to address the vast multitude of issues related to illicit drug use.

Otoki

Otoki

SUICIDEGIRL

Minnesota, USA

JUL 29, 2009 06:14 PM

Fatality said:
Decriminalization is also an option



I would only go for legalization, because decriminalization, to me, screams of lack of regulation. If possession heroin is going to be non-illegal, I would want it regulated as well. That way we can control where it comes from, quality, etc.

ChrisSick

ChrisSick

Philadelphia, PA
March 2008

JUL 29, 2009 06:22 PM

Otoki said:

Fatality said:
Decriminalization is also an option



I would only go for legalization, because decriminalization, to me, screams of lack of regulation. If possession heroin is going to be non-illegal, I would want it regulated as well.



I was using the terms interchangeably, but you bring up a really valid point. Decriminalization really isn't the same as legalization, & if you're going to allow people to use what are currently street drugs you'd be a damn fool not to regulate it (for reasons I've repeatedly mentioned throughout this thread) & to tax the ever-loving hell out of it.

BellyJack

BellyJack

I'm lost
May 2005

JUL 29, 2009 07:35 PM

I want to lasso every comment made so far, and give them a "+1".

The notion of a 'war on drugs' as a conflict that can be "won" is flawed, and it is high time we move beyond it.

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
Sorry for the bad pun. It won't happen again wink



Drugs in the broad sense (all substances that moderate physiological and psychological response, including alcohol, nicotine, etc.) are capable of great harm when used with irresponsibility. It seems to me laying down the facts both pro and con, encouraging responsible action, and establishing a safety net to catch those who fail to act responsibly is more socially sustainable than what we are currently doing.

Viking

Viking

SUICIDEGIRL

United Kingdom

JUL 29, 2009 07:56 PM

ChrisSick said:
Legalizing drugs-- all drugs-- would reduce harm for hardcore addicts & casual users alike, while at the same time allowing those who are addicted to seek treatment with less stigma, it could also go a long way to making it easier to discern the people taking a break from those that are serious about changing their lifestyles.



I agree with you, but I've heard the argument that by keeping substances illegal, they make it harder to get hold of, and therefore less people do it. I'm not sure what I think about that, personally, but it sounds plausible.

(Great article, thanks.)

Gringo

Gringo

Spokane, WA
May 2006

JUL 29, 2009 08:04 PM

Viking said:
I agree with you, but I've heard the argument that by keeping substances illegal, they make it harder to get hold of, and therefore less people do it. I'm not sure what I think about that, personally, but it sounds plausible.


I've heard that argument too. I've also heard that in the UK, people can still get pot, heroin, cocaine, speed, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc. and those drugs are all illegal.

OK, that was a bit sarcastic but making the point that making it harder to get a hold of hasn't really fixed any problems at all and I haven't heard any reliable sources reporting that drug use is down here in the U.S. At all.

All it does is drive the prices of the drugs up higher and the users (like the one in the story) go to more extremes to get the money for it. So by keeping the drugs illegal - they actually lead to crimes being committed.

Note: I don't consider using drugs a crime.

gfvella

gfvella

Australia
November 2004

JUL 29, 2009 08:41 PM

Otoki said:
You and Fatality make many great points. I've always felt uneasy about legalizing heroin, but I also read a study (I think it was in England, will search) about how legalizing and regulating heroin made many of the socially negative issues decrease.



It might have been the Swiss; they have been doing some very advanced things in term so treating Herion addiction as a medical issue and catching lots of shit from the US over it.

Swiss Trials in the BMJ

Swiss trials in the BMJ 2

BBC article on German trials

gfvella

gfvella

Australia
November 2004

JUL 29, 2009 08:52 PM

Viking said:
I agree with you, but I've heard the argument that by keeping substances illegal, they make it harder to get hold of, and therefore less people do it. I'm not sure what I think about that, personally, but it sounds plausible.



I suspect you are right, but part of me goes: "meh, who cares?"

There are lots of destructive behaviours that we as a society tolerate. Hell, alcohol is probably the most pernicious drug around in terms of death, violence and ilness, but it is legal. Then there is smoking etc.

Personally as long as people are educated as to the issues caused by their behaviours then they can go right ahead as far as i am concerned as long as what they are doing doesn't put others at risk. Hence you can't drink drive or smoke in pubs and restaurants here in Oz.

Stiles

Stiles

Philadelphia, PA
November 2002

JUL 29, 2009 09:58 PM

Viking said:

I agree with you, but I've heard the argument that by keeping substances illegal, they make it harder to get hold of, and therefore less people do it. I'm not sure what I think about that, personally, but it sounds plausible.

(Great article, thanks.)



I can't speak for how it is in the UK, but here in the US nearly every illegal or controlled drug is readily available without much effort. Quality and purity are often suspect, but if you have the money and aren't picky pot, heroin, cocaine, pills, meth, etc. aren't hard to buy - so I'd say the "illegality makes it harder to get" argument only holds true if you're comparing illegal drugs to ease of access of legal drugs like alcohol and nicotine.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next