Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42

 ... 487

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

cabaretic

cabaretic

Birmingham, AL
March 2005

APR 21, 2009 06:26 PM

motorfirebox said:
whazzat? massive spending with no oversight? whazzat? passing debt on to the next generation?

the thing that really dumbfounds me is the conservative bitching about 'no representation'. a) conservatives lack representation because they were voted out of office after wrecking the damn country, and b) i just spent the last 8 years not being represented. cry me a river.

and, haha, i'm the one that killed your lurker status? man, wait until you meet some of the real liberals who post here.



Conservatives don't want to be told how to run their own affairs, but will gladly take the money from Washington, DC, designed to allow them to do so. To me, that's complete childishness. I thought the whole point of maturity was the realization that you can't have your cake and eat it too.

Fixer

Fixer

Los Angeles, CA
October 2002

APR 21, 2009 06:50 PM

Stiles said:

Where were these idiots then?



The common opinion on these boards dismissed them as "Paultards".

Stiles

Stiles

Oakland, CA
November 2002

APR 21, 2009 06:54 PM

Fixer said:

Stiles said:

Where were these idiots then?



The common opinion on these boards dismissed them as "Paultards".



I think not. The usual suspects flacking this astroturf since Obama got in (Fox News,Dick Armey's outfit, Hannity, Limbaugh, et al.) were not on the Ron Paul wagon. Those same usual suspects were the first to loudly shout down anyone interested in fiscal responsibility under the Bush years as "unpatriotic", or worse.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

APR 21, 2009 07:28 PM

FreakPirate said:

FearTheReaper said:

Katieesq said:
Geoffrey Chaucer you are not.



Thanks. Because what I was going for with my hastily written blurb on a titty site was to write something comparable to one of the greats of literature.

You are the epitome of ridiculous.



And for someone who claims to be a comedian you have a shitty sense of humour and ridiculously thin skin.

ARRR!!!



God you people weird.

Have a nice couple of months.

DeviantDissident

DeviantDissident

Richmond, VA
March 2004

APR 21, 2009 07:36 PM

A lot of the people who started these protests were libertarians and supporters of Ron Paul. They never did support Bush and protested him throughout his 8 year reign of stupidity. The irony here is that Fox News was bashing these kind of people all throughout Bush's administration and especially during the Republican Primaries last year. I can't even remember how many times I heard all the Fox crew claim Ron Paul supported terrorism and tried to smear him every chance they got. Now they're all of a sudden trying to spin all this hype about things they were against for the past 8 years and these protests probably wouldn't have received anymore notice than a typical protest at something like a G summit but Fox News is now desperate to cling to whatever ratings they can get because now that Bush is out of office they can no longer win ratings by loyally pushing Bush's agenda. Personally I wish they wouldn't cover anything to do with libertarianism or Ron Paul because they're just going to drag it down. The libertarian movement was always a grassroots kind of thing and there's no need for mass media to try to corrupt it for their ratings.

Mr_Matt_

Mr_Matt_

Pompano Beach, FL
July 2005

APR 21, 2009 08:36 PM

Today's CE; so sadly predictable.


zoom image

semiretiredpunk

semiretiredpunk

USA
March 2007

APR 21, 2009 10:07 PM

Historical inaccuracies aside, isn't it nice not to live in fourteenth-century Europe? smile

FreakPirate

FreakPirate

Canada
November 2002

APR 22, 2009 08:25 AM

FearTheReaper said:

God you people weird.

Have a nice couple of months.



God I hope that means you're finally fucking off...

ARRR!!!

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

USA
May 2006

APR 22, 2009 08:57 AM

semiretiredpunk said:
Historical inaccuracies aside, isn't it nice not to live in fourteenth-century Europe? smile



But . . . but . . .but . . .they all had SWORDS!!! And everybody ate turkey drumsticks and drank mead and went on hunts and talked in poetry!

Unless the Ren-faires lied to me frown

meatpieboy

meatpieboy

Korea, D.P.R.
June 2004

APR 22, 2009 12:55 PM

Katieesq said:

FearTheReaper said:

Katieesq said:
Geoffrey Chaucer you are not.



Thanks. Because what I was going for with my hastily written blurb on a titty site was to write something comparable to one of the greats of literature.

You are the epitome of ridiculous.



FearTheReaper, I know we have our differences, but neither you nor I care to make this another thread about your presence on the site. What it should be about is your confusing piece of satire.

Chaucer's medieval satire was a) funny and b) a critical reflection of medieval England. If you're trying to compare protestors to ignorant medieval serfs, OK, but why exactly isn't clear. No one in the media has made the medieval link, so why are you? And why are you evoking the name of Jean-Paul Marat for the Lord here? Care to clear up some of your weaker links?



There's an analogy here to the American People as peasants, living in a feudal system. How is that not clear? Analogies, even if they're not great, don't have to be made by the media before a little guy makes them.

Homme

Homme

Los Angeles, CA
January 2009

APR 22, 2009 01:42 PM

FreakPirate said:

FearTheReaper said:

God you people weird.

Have a nice couple of months.



God I hope that means you're finally fucking off...

ARRR!!!



Ugh... could you keep your feud with FTR off of CE please? If you don't like his articles, you don't have to comment on them.

Katieesq

Katieesq

USA
June 2008

APR 22, 2009 01:53 PM

magpieboy said:

Katieesq said:

FearTheReaper said:

Katieesq said:
Geoffrey Chaucer you are not.



Thanks. Because what I was going for with my hastily written blurb on a titty site was to write something comparable to one of the greats of literature.

You are the epitome of ridiculous.



FearTheReaper, I know we have our differences, but neither you nor I care to make this another thread about your presence on the site. What it should be about is your confusing piece of satire.

Chaucer's medieval satire was a) funny and b) a critical reflection of medieval England. If you're trying to compare protestors to ignorant medieval serfs, OK, but why exactly isn't clear. No one in the media has made the medieval link, so why are you? And why are you evoking the name of Jean-Paul Marat for the Lord here? Care to clear up some of your weaker links?



There's an analogy here to the American People as peasants, living in a feudal system. How is that not clear? Analogies, even if they're not great, don't have to be made by the media before a little guy makes them.



Try that one again.

It doesn't make sense to equate a modern tea party protestor to a feudal serf. When you do, it lends legitimacy to the argument that Americans, like serfs, aren't being appropriately represented by their government's spending, thus legitimizing the protestor's message (which was not FTR's aim).

Of course serfdom and contemporary American citizens don't have to be compared by Anderson Cooper before FTR can compare them, but it's absolutely unclear why such a comparison was made.

FellOnEarth

FellOnEarth

Temecula, CA
April 2006

APR 22, 2009 02:31 PM

Katieesq said:

magpieboy said:

Katieesq said:

FearTheReaper said:

Katieesq said:
Geoffrey Chaucer you are not.



Thanks. Because what I was going for with my hastily written blurb on a titty site was to write something comparable to one of the greats of literature.

You are the epitome of ridiculous.



FearTheReaper, I know we have our differences, but neither you nor I care to make this another thread about your presence on the site. What it should be about is your confusing piece of satire.

Chaucer's medieval satire was a) funny and b) a critical reflection of medieval England. If you're trying to compare protestors to ignorant medieval serfs, OK, but why exactly isn't clear. No one in the media has made the medieval link, so why are you? And why are you evoking the name of Jean-Paul Marat for the Lord here? Care to clear up some of your weaker links?



There's an analogy here to the American People as peasants, living in a feudal system. How is that not clear? Analogies, even if they're not great, don't have to be made by the media before a little guy makes them.



Try that one again.

It doesn't make sense to equate a modern tea party protestor to a feudal serf. When you do, it lends legitimacy to the argument that Americans, like serfs, aren't being appropriately represented by their government's spending, thus legitimizing the protestor's message (which was not FTR's aim).

Of course serfdom and contemporary American citizens don't have to be compared by Anderson Cooper before FTR can compare them, but it's absolutely unclear why such a comparison was made.

I prefer my Redcoat Tea Party analogy instead.

wereduck

wereduck

I'm lost
July 2007

APR 22, 2009 03:00 PM



What will it take to wake people up to the fact that spending like this is completely irresponsible and backwards economically? How is outspending the past administration a change in the right direction?



Yeah, that "outspending the past administration" bit? That was based on the fact that Bush lied about the amount of money he was actually spending. And the only alternative plan offered was said by the Citizens for Tax Justice to cost $300 billion more annually than Obama's budget.

Since most of the current budget is for projects that require short-term increases in spending (loans to the auto industry, improvements in our infrastructure, research and development of the high-speed rail system) that will either: a)be cut over time (Iraq for example), or b) pay back for themselves with greater commerce (loans being paid back, as another example), I would say Obama's budget, as it stands right now (I'm hopeful it will stay this way, but it's a cautious optimism), is akin to the saying "you've got to spend money to make money."

Probably the only legitimate criticism I've seen from this year's "tea party" is that the Fed should be more closely monitored. The rest of it has mostly been a bunch of hand-wringing from guys like Limbaugh, Hannity, and O'Reilly who are mad that, instead of spending trillions of dollars on mercenaries who kill with reckless abandon or useless defense projects like "missile defense shields," it's instead going to fixing schools and investing in new technologies.

malkav11

malkav11

Saint Paul, MN
July 2003

APR 22, 2009 08:51 PM

Katieesq said:

magpieboy said:

Katieesq said:

FearTheReaper said:

Katieesq said:
Geoffrey Chaucer you are not.



Thanks. Because what I was going for with my hastily written blurb on a titty site was to write something comparable to one of the greats of literature.

You are the epitome of ridiculous.



FearTheReaper, I know we have our differences, but neither you nor I care to make this another thread about your presence on the site. What it should be about is your confusing piece of satire.

Chaucer's medieval satire was a) funny and b) a critical reflection of medieval England. If you're trying to compare protestors to ignorant medieval serfs, OK, but why exactly isn't clear. No one in the media has made the medieval link, so why are you? And why are you evoking the name of Jean-Paul Marat for the Lord here? Care to clear up some of your weaker links?



There's an analogy here to the American People as peasants, living in a feudal system. How is that not clear? Analogies, even if they're not great, don't have to be made by the media before a little guy makes them.



Try that one again.

It doesn't make sense to equate a modern tea party protestor to a feudal serf. When you do, it lends legitimacy to the argument that Americans, like serfs, aren't being appropriately represented by their government's spending, thus legitimizing the protestor's message (which was not FTR's aim).

Of course serfdom and contemporary American citizens don't have to be compared by Anderson Cooper before FTR can compare them, but it's absolutely unclear why such a comparison was made.



Well, the analogy being made is that the protestors are protesting taxation of very rich people who have never done anything in particular to deserve said protestor's loyalties (if not actively fucked them over), taxation that will not fall on their shoulders, and in fact will in part be given to them. Not that the government is oppressing these people.

Brighteyesgr

Brighteyesgr

Greece
January 2007

APR 23, 2009 02:08 AM

Homme said:

FreakPirate said:

FearTheReaper said:

God you people weird.

Have a nice couple of months.



God I hope that means you're finally fucking off...

ARRR!!!



Ugh... could you keep your feud with FTR off of CE please? If you don't like his articles, you don't have to comment on them.



QFT, your trolling on his articles is comming off as petty and childish as FTR own tantrums.

fountainofdreams

fountainofdreams

Batavia, IL
January 2005

APR 23, 2009 11:20 AM

Coyotemike said:

semiretiredpunk said:
Historical inaccuracies aside, isn't it nice not to live in fourteenth-century Europe? smile



But . . . but . . .but . . .they all had SWORDS!!! And everybody ate turkey drumsticks and drank mead and went on hunts and talked in poetry!

Unless the Ren-faires lied to me frown



They also sold leather mugs and erotic leather garb.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next