even if it was over turned, he'll still be serving life for rape of a 13 year old, even though she's now one of his wives.
I wish more courts where that strict when it comes to child molesters.
Helter said:
Well, as far back as 1820 the estimated life expectancy in the US was around 40. So it wasn't quite as bleak as all that, especially since that number was influenced heavily (I believe) by the high rate of death in children (though since I don't know exactly how they determine the life expectancy figures, I could be wrong about that).
Infant mortality skewed pre-modern life expectancies sharply downward. Maternal mortality also skewed the average downward. Men who lived in the country and survived childhood often lived to eighty or ninety. Life expectancy in cities was sharply lower because of epidemic disease.
Infant mortality skewed pre-modern life expectancies sharply downward. Maternal mortality also skewed the average downward. Men who lived in the country and survived childhood often lived to eighty or ninety. Life expectancy in cities was sharply lower because of epidemic disease.
Thanks for the info Plonk about life expectancy in the pre-modern era.I hadn't realised that infant mortality was a factor in the statistics,I thought those numbers were crunched seperatley.
Thirteen this day and age is way too young for someone to get married.If two people of that age get married they're going to have a hard time making ends meet.Can you even enter into a legal contract( ie rental agreement ,bank loan etc)at that age?
An adult marrying a thirteen year old is just wrong in my mind.There is no way that they would have equality in their marriage,no matter how emotionally mature the thirteen year old is.
TeeJay
United Kingdom
February 2003
DEC 06, 2003 01:44 PM