Trevallion said:
The idea that a law professor at the University of Chicago Law School and former editor of the Harvard Law Review would be incapable of writing a book is completely fucking absurd.
HARVARD IS LYING TO COVER UP HIS LACK OF AN EDUCATION!!11!!!!111ELEVENTY!!!1!1
O! for my sake do you with Fortune chide,
The guilty goddess of my harmful deeds,
That did not better for my life provide
Than public means which public manners breeds.
Thence comes it that my name receives a brand,
And almost thence my nature is subdued
To what it works in, like the dyer's hand:
Pity me, then, and wish I were renewed;
Whilst, like a willing patient, I will drink
Potions of eisell 'gainst my strong infection;
No bitterness that I will bitter think,
Nor double penance, to correct correction.
Pity me then, dear friend, and I assure ye,
Even that your pity is enough to cure me.
-William Shakespeare, Eleventy-first Sonnet (111)
111th Congress of the U.S. will follow the current one!
Ahh, I see patterns everywhere!!!
29
AceT
Portland, OR
April 2004
OCT 13, 2008 03:05 PM
I really thought Subrosa was joking when he mentioned the 23-word sentences. Then I read the article.
AceT said:
I really thought Subrosa was joking when he mentioned the 23-word sentences. Then I read the article.
Nope! Other good tidbits of evidence:
-Both Obama and Ayers like to use "ocean" analogies.
-Both Obama and Ayers talk about race.
-Both Obama and Ayers are liberal.
-Both Obama and Ayers score the same on some readability index, so long as you make sure to use excerpts of their books to ensure that they score the same, rather than use the whole book where they would score differently.
-Obama is black, Ayers once claimed he was black.
31
AceT
Portland, OR
April 2004
OCT 13, 2008 03:33 PM
Personally, I think Web Bot wrote the book. The best way to predict the future is to invent it.
Subrosa said:
-Both Obama and Ayers score the same on some readability index, so long as you make sure to use excerpts of their books to ensure that they score the same, rather than use the whole book where they would score differently.
To me excerpt implies some sizable portion of both bodies of work, but the article only compares two sentences for readability.
Also, it calls Barack Obama at the time of the book's publishing "an unschooled amateur". If being a graduate of Columbia and Harvard Law school in addition to the stuff I mentioned earlier makes you an unschooled amateur, then this author doesn't belong anywhere near a keyboard. Though apparently he's written 7 books that I've never heard of so maybe he's a bit jealous of Obama's success?
The public is asked to believe Obama wrote Dreams From My Father on his own, almost as though he were some sort of literary idiot savant. I do not buy this canard for a minute, not at all. Writing is as much a craft as, say, golf. To put this in perspective, imagine if a friend played a few rounds in the high 90s and then a few years later, without further practice, made the PGA Tour. It doesn't happen.
And yet, given the biases of the literary establishment, no reviewer of note has so much as questioned Obama's role in the writing, then or now. As the New York Times gushed, Obama was "that rare politician who can write . . . and write movingly and genuinely about himself." These accolades matter all the more because Obama has built his political persona around his presumably superior intellect, Dreams being exhibit A.
Shy of a confession by those involved, I will not be able to prove conclusively that Obama did not write this book. As shall be seen, however, there are only two real possibilities: one is that Obama experienced a near miraculous turnaround in his literary abilities; the second is that he had major editorial help, up to and including a ghostwriter.
Typically when making an argument in the realm of stylistics (which is where this accusation is coming from), the statistical analyses are used to support a much broader and more insightful argument that covers elements of style, word choice, grammar, and register. Further, they usually involve large bodies of a corpus, not chunks randomly selected for comparison, and build the qualitative analysis on a quantitative underpinning. One might surmise that the author of this article is a woe-begotten fucktard wandering around with a screw driver trying to hammer nails.
I love Wonkette's term - "Internet hobo" - for Mr. Cashill.
About a week ago, however, I heard from a new contributor. I will refer to him as “Mr. West.” Like most contributors, he prefers to remain anonymous. The media punishment that Joe the Plumber received has much to do with this nearly universal reticence.
If the 'serious people' he has been in communication with are of the same quality as Mr. Wurzelbacher it is little wonder they prefer to remain anonymous.
About a week ago, however, I heard from a new contributor. I will refer to him as “Mr. West.” Like most contributors, he prefers to remain anonymous. The media punishment that Joe the Plumber received has much to do with this nearly universal reticence.
If the 'serious people' he has been in communication with are of the same quality as Mr. Wurzelbacher it is little wonder they prefer to remain anonymous.
The insane hubris of this statement is what gets me. Like the media glare on some insane wingnut yayhoo who is referenced in an obscure blog posting by another insane wingnut yayhoo would be in any way comparable to the way they looked at a guy who at every opportunity injected himself into the most hotly-contested presidential campaign in history after being mentioned 37 times in a nationally televised presidential debate. It's practically the same thing, you see.
Yes, Jack Cashill, the spotlight on you us just that bright, simply for being the mad genius of literary criticism that you are. It's pretty much Brangelina, Blanket Jackson and Cashill that everyone wants to know about NONFUCKINGSTOP.
The insane hubris of this statement is what gets me ...Yes, Jack Cashill, the spotlight on you is just that bright, simply for being the mad genius of literary criticism that you are. ...
Had to read up on this guy's thesis, and came away less than impressed.
The program used to "prove" these linkages was FictionFixer, which purports to chomp through an author's work, and deliver editing suggestions on how to make it more like an amalgam of current best-sellers. Towards the bottom of Cashill's argument is a link to this program's output and a commentary which reads in part like an advertisement.
Excerpt from page 12.
These points are calculated by giving weights to the occurrences of certain words in each work. The fact that the numbers are so similar on both sides with such large numbers involved indicates that the writers are very similar (if not identical). It is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to "fool" Koppel's Gender Algorithm."
Never heard of this algorithm, and learned it was developed by Moshe Koppel - a respected linguistic scientist - but the claim that it is nearly impossible to fool it doesn't necessarily hold up to closer scrutiny.
One of the names Mr. Carhill drops is Andrew Longman.
Andrew Longman, a consulting instrumentation scientist presently working in test engineering, observes: "The Ayers-Obama matching shows a measurable and substantial effect. It is easily and objectively distinguishable from comparison to a third document.
He does appear to be an engineer, but his writings in WorldNetDaily tend toward the absurd. Here he is arguing that compact fluorescent bulbs will increase carbon dioxide emissions by forcing homeowners to use more heating fuel.
Let's consider an American home at 1,700 square feet, using 10 watts per square foot over the course of a year for heating, and lit with 30 incandescent, 100-watt light bulbs. In such a normal home, 17 percent of the wattage needed for winter heating would be supplied by the electric lights, when the lights were turned on. If you replace those incandescents with compact fluorescents, only 3 percent of the average heat necessary to heat the house would now be available from the light bulbs.
Yes, let's consider a normal home running thirty fucking 100 watt light bulbs!
... and you gotta love this quote from Cashill
Indeed, landlubber Obama knowingly manages to use "ballast" as a metaphor. Who knows from Ballast? I don’t.
Despite the fact that I have spent a good chunk of every summer of my life at the ocean, the only two of the above words to appear in my own semi-memoir on race, Sucker Punch, are "current" and "tide."
Crap, I'm a landlubber, and learned what ballast was in grade school. Despite not knowing what it is Jack Cashill certainly seems to be full of it.
DevilsReject
Cleveland, OH
February 2007
OCT 13, 2008 02:16 PM