Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11

 ... 430

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

doc_holiday

doc_holiday

Los Angeles, CA
June 2008

JUN 17, 2008 08:14 PM

_Margot_ said:

doc_holiday said:

_Margot_ said:

doc_holiday said:
Its just sad that the democratic party is still so divided and touchy, we have such a great chance to refresh the worldly image of America. I just hope untimely endorsements don't make us look too stupid.



I don't see how this endorsement would make the party look stupid.

Having someone who has a great deal of knowledge and passion for climate change working closely with the Democratic Party candidate is going to be quite helpful in countering McCain's newfound caring for the environment.

Sure, coming out during the Primaries would have been better, but his support is helpful no matter what, IMO.



I just think it shows that many politicians in the democratic party are to afraid to stand up and say something when it really matters. If he would have made his endorsement 5 months ago it would have meant something. C'mon do you think he'd endorse McCain?



No, I know what you are saying. But his endorsement no matter when it is has more meaning than let's say Barb Mikulski.



Who?

I just think he could have done more to help out his party. But I guess he has that political doormat personality.

motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

JUN 17, 2008 08:16 PM

doc_holiday said:

Hooraydiation said:
You should look at the divisions in the Republican party sometime.



Yes the Republican party can be very divided, but overall they stand much more united then the Democratic Party has in almost a decade.



it seems to me that was once true, but has become less and less true over the past year or two. it really began to be noticeable around the time the primaries started.

MisterLinguist

MisterLinguist

Birmingham, AL
October 2005

JUN 17, 2008 08:24 PM

doc_holiday said:

_Margot_ said:

doc_holiday said:

_Margot_ said:

doc_holiday said:
Its just sad that the democratic party is still so divided and touchy, we have such a great chance to refresh the worldly image of America. I just hope untimely endorsements don't make us look too stupid.



I don't see how this endorsement would make the party look stupid.

Having someone who has a great deal of knowledge and passion for climate change working closely with the Democratic Party candidate is going to be quite helpful in countering McCain's newfound caring for the environment.

Sure, coming out during the Primaries would have been better, but his support is helpful no matter what, IMO.



I just think it shows that many politicians in the democratic party are to afraid to stand up and say something when it really matters. If he would have made his endorsement 5 months ago it would have meant something. C'mon do you think he'd endorse McCain?



No, I know what you are saying. But his endorsement no matter when it is has more meaning than let's say Barb Mikulski.



Who?

I just think he could have done more to help out his party. But I guess he has that political doormat personality.



And we all know that it is really nice and classy to qualify a party's actions or a person by how much "testicle-having" qualities they have.

doc_holiday

doc_holiday

Los Angeles, CA
June 2008

JUN 17, 2008 08:26 PM

_Margot_ said:

doc_holiday said:

Hooraydiation said:
You should look at the divisions in the Republican party sometime.



Yes the Republican party can be very divided, but overall they stand much more united then the Democratic Party has in almost a decade.



I don't think so.



why?

Hooraydiation

Hooraydiation

Boston, MA
October 2005

JUN 17, 2008 08:27 PM

doc_holiday said:

_Margot_ said:

doc_holiday said:

Hooraydiation said:
You should look at the divisions in the Republican party sometime.



Yes the Republican party can be very divided, but overall they stand much more united then the Democratic Party has in almost a decade.



I don't think so.



why?



Here's one reason you're wrong.

_Margot_

_Margot_

Santa Monica, CA
December 2007

JUN 17, 2008 10:14 PM

Hooraydiation said:

doc_holiday said:

_Margot_ said:

doc_holiday said:

Hooraydiation said:
You should look at the divisions in the Republican party sometime.



Yes the Republican party can be very divided, but overall they stand much more united then the Democratic Party has in almost a decade.



I don't think so.



why?



Here's one reason you're wrong.



Exactly.

DannyDMc

DannyDMc

Fargo, ND
July 2003

JUN 18, 2008 12:04 AM

doc_holiday said:

Hooraydiation said:
You should look at the divisions in the Republican party sometime.



Yes the Republican party can be very divided, but overall they stand much more united then the Democratic Party has in almost a decade.



See, the news media isn't focused on it too much, but the Republicans seem to be much less excited and more divided this time around than even the Democrats are.

doc_holiday

doc_holiday

Los Angeles, CA
June 2008

JUN 18, 2008 01:39 AM

I dont know what the testicle comment was about....? I just think the republican party understands the power of unification better than the democrats have for many years now. I don't think McCain is someone that most republicans want, but to me they seem more united as a whole. Whereas democrats may have been more divided overall after the Clinton/Obama primary. I just think a long primary may have hurt us more than helped us win back the white house.

scylis

scylis

Anchorage, AK
November 2004

JUN 18, 2008 03:04 AM

fuck you, site! i had about a five paragraph post of fucking brilliance that you just fucking ate! that can't be duplicated! i'd need more gin and i really need to go to bed! i want to anally deface you with your grandmother's skull while i fuck one of your eyesockets hard enough to brake your insipid little nose with my glorious, hairy man-sack!

fuck you!

skull

scylis

scylis

Anchorage, AK
November 2004

JUN 18, 2008 03:15 AM

basically, it can sorta (unfortunately) be summed up as:

Democratic divide not going to be anywhere as serious as they'd like you to think since Obama got the number of delegates needed rather than a "backroom deal."

the Republican divide is not as noticeable as they seem rather lackluster and not enthused. conservatives are not fond of him, and he's either have to pick a VP that might go against the Administration he'd set up or roll a hard six and change a lot of his platform (thus pissing off the support he already has) to placate him. and even then, it might not work. so even if he can pick up more mainstream conservative support, will it be at the expense of his neocon support, and will it even be enough to make a difference given how apathetic the Republicans seem about him in general?

dog-fucking, shit eating, old woman's bones humping, toaster-loving, ass licking, boot scraping, goose-stepping fuckhole of a fucking bandwidth problem!!

GRRRAAAAAAAAA!

MisterLinguist

MisterLinguist

Birmingham, AL
October 2005

JUN 18, 2008 05:23 AM

doc_holiday said:
I dont know what the testicle comment was about....?


Please just think for a second, try and figure it out.

I just think the republican party understands the power of unification better than the democrats have for many years now.

So you maintain this attitude au contraire to the points made by others in this thread? Do you have a source to back up your thoughts as they do?

I don't think McCain is someone that most republicans want, but to me they seem more united as a whole.

Once again, source please.

Whereas democrats may have been more divided overall after the Clinton/Obama primary.

The primary is over, in case you haven't noticed. All allies of and former allies to the Clinton Administration have endorsed Lil' Barry.

I just think a long primary may have hurt us more than helped us win back the white house.

Do you have any sources that can prove how it hurt us, or should we just take your Oh-So-Insightful word for it?



Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next