Current Events

TOPICS:

4/4/08

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15

 ... 426

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next

UpTight

UpTight

United Kingdom
December 2003

MAR 29, 2008 12:21 PM

Actually, I'm not that concerned. And on reflection, even if you just post TROLL or idiot, that's better than nothing.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

Los Angeles, CA

MAR 29, 2008 12:56 PM

UpTight said:
Actually, I'm not that concerned. And on reflection, even if you just post TROLL or idiot, that's better than nothing.



TROLL idiot.

BlastProcessing

BlastProcessing

Knoxville, TN
OLD SKOOL

MAR 29, 2008 01:04 PM

UpTight said:

attn_ho said:
TROLL!


yes - I've heard that, but I still don't know why I'm expected to care



If you cared about reasoned debate, you'd care about the opinion of those with whom you attempted debate. You don't, so you don't.

Instead of reasoned debate, I'm offered words like "troll", "idiot" etc as if this will magically send me off into paroxysms of mortification and self-doubt.



And instead of reasoned debate, we're offered your thinly-veiled right-wing anti-Muslim belligerence. When you start reaping something other than what you sow, this might be a problem.

To me, you only guys exist only in text and when that is all that's offered I just think "oh well, they have no argument, but they can't control their emotions".

Not that you should worry what I think, either....

It's all a bit sad, I guess.



Right. It's for your own amusement. It's for your own desire for attention. It's to get your anti-Muslim sentiment, devoid of any real meaning, off your chest. It's not about debate, or being right, or changing minds, or providing intelligent opinions or reasoned discourse.

Uncognitive

Uncognitive

Brooklyn, NY
May 2003

MAR 29, 2008 04:30 PM

UpTight said:
Instead of reasoned debate, I'm offered words like "troll", "idiot" etc as if this will magically send me off into paroxysms of mortification and self-doubt.



This would make more sense if you didn't flee from reasoned debate like a vampire at daybreak.

Mr_Mocata

Mr_Mocata

United Kingdom
OLD SKOOL

MAR 29, 2008 05:00 PM

UpTight said:
To me, you only guys exist only in text and when that is all that's offered I just think "oh well, they have no argument, but they can't control their emotions".


Have you considered applying the Turing Test to them?

bald_eagle

bald_eagle

Indianapolis, IN
November 2006

MAR 29, 2008 11:14 PM

UpTight said:

Instead of reasoned debate, I'm offered words like "troll", "idiot" etc as if this will magically send me off into paroxysms of mortification and self-doubt.

To me, you only guys exist only in text and when that is all that's offered I just think "oh well, they have no argument, but they can't control their emotions".

Not that you should worry what I think, either....

It's all a bit sad, I guess.



What's sad is that you still haven't presented one single source to back up your assertion that liberals have been pushing for censorship on this.

attn_ho

attn_ho

Brooklyn, NY
February 2004

MAR 29, 2008 11:55 PM

bald_eagle said:

UpTight said:

Instead of reasoned debate, I'm offered words like "troll", "idiot" etc as if this will magically send me off into paroxysms of mortification and self-doubt.

To me, you only guys exist only in text and when that is all that's offered I just think "oh well, they have no argument, but they can't control their emotions".

Not that you should worry what I think, either....

It's all a bit sad, I guess.



What's sad is that you still haven't presented one single source to back up your assertion that liberals have been pushing for censorship on this.



you dont understand. Hes not interested in debating facts, he posts

for those that enjoy my posts or enjoy debating them.


In other words we are to debate Uptight's opinions, while he judges from above.

bald_eagle

bald_eagle

Indianapolis, IN
November 2006

MAR 29, 2008 11:58 PM

attn_ho said:

bald_eagle said:

UpTight said:

Instead of reasoned debate, I'm offered words like "troll", "idiot" etc as if this will magically send me off into paroxysms of mortification and self-doubt.

To me, you only guys exist only in text and when that is all that's offered I just think "oh well, they have no argument, but they can't control their emotions".

Not that you should worry what I think, either....

It's all a bit sad, I guess.



What's sad is that you still haven't presented one single source to back up your assertion that liberals have been pushing for censorship on this.



you dont understand. Hes not interested in debating facts, he posts

for those that enjoy my posts or enjoy debating them.


In other words we are to debate Uptight's opinions, while he judges from above.


You sure it's above?

DevilsReject

DevilsReject

Cleveland, OH
February 2007

MAR 30, 2008 12:05 AM

attn_ho said:

bald_eagle said:

UpTight said:

Instead of reasoned debate, I'm offered words like "troll", "idiot" etc as if this will magically send me off into paroxysms of mortification and self-doubt.

To me, you only guys exist only in text and when that is all that's offered I just think "oh well, they have no argument, but they can't control their emotions".

Not that you should worry what I think, either....

It's all a bit sad, I guess.



What's sad is that you still haven't presented one single source to back up your assertion that liberals have been pushing for censorship on this.



you dont understand. Hes not interested in debating facts, he posts

for those that enjoy my posts or enjoy debating them.


In other words we are to debate Uptight's opinions, while he judges from above.



wait. he is Jeebus?

attn_ho

attn_ho

Brooklyn, NY
February 2004

MAR 30, 2008 12:05 AM

bald_eagle said:

attn_ho said:

bald_eagle said:

UpTight said:

Instead of reasoned debate, I'm offered words like "troll", "idiot" etc as if this will magically send me off into paroxysms of mortification and self-doubt.

To me, you only guys exist only in text and when that is all that's offered I just think "oh well, they have no argument, but they can't control their emotions".

Not that you should worry what I think, either....

It's all a bit sad, I guess.



What's sad is that you still haven't presented one single source to back up your assertion that liberals have been pushing for censorship on this.



you dont understand. Hes not interested in debating facts, he posts

for those that enjoy my posts or enjoy debating them.


In other words we are to debate Uptight's opinions, while he judges from above.


You sure it's above?



from beneath the bridge?

UpTight

UpTight

United Kingdom
December 2003

MAR 30, 2008 12:41 AM

BlastProcessing said:

And instead of reasoned debate, we're offered your thinly-veiled right-wing anti-Muslim belligerence.



When someone criticises Islamofascists and you accuse them of attacking ordinary Muslims, what sort of message are you giving out? That you care? That it is wrong to attack Islamists? That you think theocratic imperialism, terrorism and medieval misogyny are cool? That you are showing solidarity with fellow America-haters? Or is it just that you see this as a handy radical issue to hang you hat on.

I'm sorry. I won't lump Muslims in with Islamists and I am not going to be silenced by any leftard's ersatz morality on this. I feel no shame whatsoever in speaking out against those fascistic cunts at any opportunity.

UpTight

UpTight

United Kingdom
December 2003

MAR 30, 2008 12:46 AM

mercurius said:

UpTight said:
To me, you only guys exist only in text and when that is all that's offered I just think "oh well, they have no argument, but they can't control their emotions".


Have you considered applying the Turing Test to them?



But Turing tests have a wider, more creative range of responses that most of these guys.


Mr_Mocata

Mr_Mocata

United Kingdom
OLD SKOOL

MAR 30, 2008 07:22 AM

UpTight said:

mercurius said:

UpTight said:
To me, you only guys exist only in text and when that is all that's offered I just think "oh well, they have no argument, but they can't control their emotions".


Have you considered applying the Turing Test to them?



But Turing tests have a wider, more creative range of responses that most of these guys.




biggrin

Uncognitive

Uncognitive

Brooklyn, NY
May 2003

MAR 30, 2008 07:52 AM

UpTight said:
When someone criticises Islamofascists and you accuse them of attacking ordinary Muslims, what sort of message are you giving out? That you care? That it is wrong to attack Islamists? That you think theocratic imperialism, terrorism and medieval misogyny are cool? That you are showing solidarity with fellow America-haters? Or is it just that you see this as a handy radical issue to hang you hat on.

I'm sorry. I won't lump Muslims in with Islamists and I am not going to be silenced by any leftard's ersatz morality on this. I feel no shame whatsoever in speaking out against those fascistic cunts at any opportunity.



Yeah, good thing "Islamofascism" isn't some handy issue for you to hang your hat on.

What's hilarious is that you're insulting others for not having a "creative range of responses" to your rantings, when you're adopting the least creative response possible: "Either you're for us, or against us".

I know you've puffed yourself up as some brave crusader for...uh, something or other, but I have to remind you that not everyone who criticizes "Islamism" is above any criticism themselves.

I mean, I'm sure objecting to "goatfucker" and "there is no such thing as moderate Islam" and attempting to ban the Koran is all just "leftard ersatz morality", right?

Shiny_metal_ass

Shiny_metal_ass

I'm lost
October 2006

MAR 30, 2008 08:47 AM

You know you're all just giving him what he wants, right? This disease is the only one that can only be cured by ignoring it. Please stop feeding the trolls so our forum can actually be about current events again instead of being used as food for one persons ego.

Trolls, don't feed 'em.

BlastProcessing

BlastProcessing

Knoxville, TN
OLD SKOOL

MAR 30, 2008 09:34 AM

UpTight said:

BlastProcessing said:

And instead of reasoned debate, we're offered your thinly-veiled right-wing anti-Muslim belligerence.



When someone criticises Islamofascists and you accuse them of attacking ordinary Muslims, what sort of message are you giving out? That you care? That it is wrong to attack Islamists? That you think theocratic imperialism, terrorism and medieval misogyny are cool? That you are showing solidarity with fellow America-haters? Or is it just that you see this as a handy radical issue to hang you hat on.


That your posting history reveals that you see no real difference between the two groups and that I recognize this.

I'm sorry. I won't lump Muslims in with Islamists


You regularly have, and will continue to.

and I am not going to be silenced by any leftard's ersatz morality on this.


I am less than moved by the moral judgments of a guy who screams HOLY CRAP FRANKENSTEIN COOTIES EWWW every time someone looks scientifically at a human embryo.

I feel no shame whatsoever in speaking out against those fascistic cunts at any opportunity.


I don't get why. You don't care about the situation at hand. You've admitted as much yourself.

Also, way to not totally ignore every other point raised since your last post. For the record, cherry-picking points to which you respond isn't one of those things that reasoned debaters do.

bald_eagle

bald_eagle

Indianapolis, IN
November 2006

MAR 30, 2008 05:41 PM

Still waiting for that source ...

attn_ho

attn_ho

Brooklyn, NY
February 2004

MAR 30, 2008 06:02 PM

bald_eagle said:
Still waiting for that source ...



hahahahaha!

Tiwaz

Tiwaz

Germany
July 2006

MAR 30, 2008 07:28 PM

Everyone needs to stop responding to him or else he's just going to keep coming back.

bald_eagle

bald_eagle

Indianapolis, IN
November 2006

MAR 30, 2008 07:32 PM

He's welcome to come back. Just as soon as he provides one single source for his assertion that liberals have been seeking censorship on the guy.

He doesn't seem to be in any hurry to do that ...

Tiwaz

Tiwaz

Germany
July 2006

MAR 30, 2008 07:52 PM

bald_eagle said:
He's welcome to come back. Just as soon as he provides one single source for his assertion that liberals have been seeking censorship on the guy.

He doesn't seem to be in any hurry to do that ...

He never is, which makes him a troll and not worth anyone's time. If people want engage his bullshit, then by all means do so. It's their prerogative. He's just an idiot, and I wish he'd go away.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next