Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80

 ... 487

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8

 ... 12

Next

Dabble

Dabble

Gilbert, AZ
December 2005

FEB 21, 2008 05:01 PM

Fucking Bush, man. I'd abstain from voting completely, but it would be like going in and voting for one of the dickheads anyway. Besides, if I don't vote, I don't feel I have the right to bitch.

Either way, bottom line, the fence idea is, at best, dippy, no matter what your stance on immigration, legal or illegal, might be. Especially the way they're going about it.

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

FEB 21, 2008 05:08 PM

coyotemike said:
So . . . I hear Bush's government is taking some citizens' property in order to build a hugely expensive and totally worthless partial fence, while leaving the property of rich supporters and golf courses alone. Anybody else hear that?



Yup.

sdago

sdago

Corona, CA
January 2003

FEB 21, 2008 06:26 PM

Give a bum a dollar it'll encourage him to keep begging. Employ and pay illegals they will keep coming. So, mow your own damn lawns you fat lazy Americans.

Its good that the economy is going down the crapper. Maybe now people will stop blowing their money on pedicured lawns. We'll finally save our water resources and our health care system!

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

USA
May 2006

FEB 21, 2008 06:39 PM

sdago said:
Give a bum a dollar it'll encourage him to keep begging. Employ and pay illegals they will keep coming. So, mow your own damn lawns you fat lazy Americans.

Its good that the economy is going down the crapper. Maybe now people will stop blowing their money on pedicured lawns. We'll finally save our water resources and our health care system!



Nice way to blame the people who are dying in the desert while trying to keep their family from starving to death. And you're so right. Our economy is in the crapper because there is an available workforce, willing to be paid less than minimum wage. We'll be much better off with $10 heads of cabbage, $20 gallons of O.J, and $15 Big Macs.

Have you heard of economics?

Oh, and of course it is the fault of day laborers that our water is being wasted. It has nothing to do with industrial waste. And the problems in our health care system will automatically be solved if we make the dying people prove their citizenship before they are let in the E.R.

Varuka_Salt

Varuka_Salt

I'm lost
October 2006

FEB 21, 2008 06:51 PM

sdago said:
Give a bum a dollar it'll encourage him to keep begging. Employ and pay illegals they will keep coming. So, mow your own damn lawns you fat lazy Americans.

Its good that the economy is going down the crapper. Maybe now people will stop blowing their money on pedicured lawns. We'll finally save our water resources and our health care system!



Yeah, I mean, why should those greedy landscapers or other home service providers have jobs anyway? Parasites. It's not people like that have families to feed or anything. There's not any real Americans doing that type of work at all anyway.

vampyrezz

vampyrezz

Santa Ana, CA
February 2008

FEB 21, 2008 08:14 PM

this is just lovely! and yes it is a retarded fence

401kboy

401kboy

Woodbridge, NJ
May 2007

FEB 21, 2008 08:17 PM

The "fence" is a smoke screen. There is NO political entity in the US that wants to stop illegal immigration. The right wants cheap labor and the left wants more poor people, who will then need more government services.

There are two different issues at play here. One is border security, which right now doesn't exist. Anyone could come into the country from Mexico. The Mexican government will even help you. I can't bring a bottle of water into an airport, but I could drive a truck loaded with guns and drugs over the southern border, and get the Mexican army to help.

The other issue is what to do with all the people who are already here. We're not going to deport them. We should get them on a fast track to citizenship, providing that we can slow the influx of more illegal immigrants.

And yes, the Mexican government is being very hypocritical on the issue, because they abuse immigrants from Guatemala and El Salvador.

strndniowa

strndniowa

Grimes, IA
May 2007

FEB 21, 2008 08:21 PM

How about a much shorter fence? and put it around, say D.C.?
Walls and fences stand for a lot of things- for instance the Berlin Wall? That worked out well for everyone, right? And that's the sort of image we want associated with our country puke blackeyed
Oh, wait, thanks to the Bush Administration, we are an international joke already....
And of course its not a fence that is continuous- it starts and stops, and apparently isn't even on the border itself? (can I see some ID for walking from this piece of
US soil to that piece son?)
I keep hoping I'll wake up from this nightmare soon...
P.S. Anyone read about the virtual fence in part of Arizona that will employ optical sensors that can distinguish cattle from people or vehicles?
A:Cattle have more rights than people?
B: wouldn't barbed wire be cheaper
C: Won't the Americans dying of embarrassment from being parts of this country just get cow suits and escape to Mexico anyhow?
P.P.S. Doing something stupid- typical government-Doing something just asinine that screws over poor people- Bush administration tongue

Ferretbite

Ferretbite

Mexico
September 2006

FEB 21, 2008 08:39 PM

401kboy said:
The "fence" is a smoke screen. There is NO political entity in the US that wants to stop illegal immigration. The right wants cheap labor and the left wants more poor people, who will then need more government services.

There are two different issues at play here. One is border security, which right now doesn't exist. Anyone could come into the country from Mexico. The Mexican government will even help you. I can't bring a bottle of water into an airport, but I could drive a truck loaded with guns and drugs over the southern border, and get the Mexican army to help.

The other issue is what to do with all the people who are already here. We're not going to deport them. We should get them on a fast track to citizenship, providing that we can slow the influx of more illegal immigrants.

And yes, the Mexican government is being very hypocritical on the issue, because they abuse immigrants from Guatemala and El Salvador.



I take it your main source of information is called Lou Dobbs. There are multiple check points on the road to the Mexico-U.S. border and then there's the toll bridges where your vehicle has to be inspected by the Border Patrol and they check for papers and other stuff. To get a truck loaded with weapons across the border would require assistance on both sides too.

I'd like to know where you heard our government helps anyone smuggle goods or people across the border too, because in my experience, this is not true, and moreover, two paragraphs after you accuse our Government of "helping anyone come into the country" from here, you mention the abuse of other immigrants once they enter our territory, which takes place when they're stopped on their way to the U.S., and once again, as I said on a previous post, this happens mostly on a local level, so it's not "The Mexican Government" as much as the local authorithes, which are different in each state, just like yours.

Furthermore, the said hipocrisy can be argued against, because the federal Government has admitted these abuses before the UN (article in spanish), in a report submitted by our Government to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, which comprises a study on the subject for the past 10 years.

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

USA
May 2006

FEB 21, 2008 08:42 PM

Ferretbite said:

401kboy said:
The "fence" is a smoke screen. There is NO political entity in the US that wants to stop illegal immigration. The right wants cheap labor and the left wants more poor people, who will then need more government services.

There are two different issues at play here. One is border security, which right now doesn't exist. Anyone could come into the country from Mexico. The Mexican government will even help you. I can't bring a bottle of water into an airport, but I could drive a truck loaded with guns and drugs over the southern border, and get the Mexican army to help.

The other issue is what to do with all the people who are already here. We're not going to deport them. We should get them on a fast track to citizenship, providing that we can slow the influx of more illegal immigrants.

And yes, the Mexican government is being very hypocritical on the issue, because they abuse immigrants from Guatemala and El Salvador.



I take it your main source of information is called Lou Dobbs. There are multiple check points on the road to the Mexico-U.S. border and then there's the toll bridges where your vehicle has to be inspected by the Border Patrol and they check for papers and other stuff. To get a truck loaded with weapons across the border would require assistance on both sides too.

I'd like to know where you heard our government helps anyone smuggle goods or people across the border too, because in my experience, this is not true, and furthermore, two paragraphs after you accuse our Government of "helping anyone come into the country" from here, you mention the abuse of other immigrants once they enter our territory, which takes place when they're stopped on their way to the U.S., and once again, as I said on a previous post, this happens mostly on a local level, so it's not "The Mexican Government" as much as the local authorithes, which are different in each state, just like yours.



Such smuggling clearly occurs along the border between New Jersey and Mexico.

frozenmanbits

frozenmanbits

Cincinnati, OH
October 2003

FEB 21, 2008 08:56 PM

thank you for this!

AmbientLight

AmbientLight

I'm lost
March 2005

FEB 21, 2008 10:50 PM

With all this in mind, along with the overall erosion of civil rights in this country, a lingering question haunts me...

Is this fence meant to keep them out, or us in?

surreal surreal surreal

LSlice

LSlice

Montclair, NJ
December 2007

FEB 21, 2008 10:54 PM

I think's it's mainly meant as a fuckload of pork.

DevilsReject

DevilsReject

Cleveland, OH
February 2007

FEB 21, 2008 11:51 PM

AmbientLight said:
With all this in mind, along with the overall erosion of civil rights in this country, a lingering question haunts me...

Is this fence meant to keep them out, or us in?

surreal surreal surreal



i think it's a ploy to make us believe that Bush is actually doing something about immigration, just masked as a retarded fence.

will it be a pretty fence? or just that chainlink stuff? I vote for a nice wooden privacy fence, something in a durable oak, or pine, that can be stained so it will fit in with the landscape. Then we can plant flowers along our side of it, maybe so we can forget that we have an immigration problem.

OoOh! and an immigration "pond" every so often to go with the wooden privacy alien fence, with some loverly waterfalls, and koi!!

stockula

stockula

Anchorage, AK
May 2003

FEB 22, 2008 01:16 AM

Even the mildest efforts towards enforcement of existing laws has seen a marked exodus of illegals from Arizona. If that same enforcement nationwide coupled with active restriction of illegal border crossing would happen, the illegals problem could almost painlesslessly happen.

That is all that we are asking. The law be enforced, and sovereign borders be respected.

ASSH0LE

ASSH0LE

Las Vegas, NV
June 2003

FEB 22, 2008 02:12 AM

UpTight said:
I suppose an alligator-filled moat would also be out of the question....



I'm sorry. David Sams has bought up all the crocodiles.

RedBstrd

RedBstrd

Riverside, CA
April 2004

FEB 22, 2008 02:15 AM

stockula said:
Even the mildest efforts towards enforcement of existing laws has seen a marked exodus of illegals from Arizona. If that same enforcement nationwide coupled with active restriction of illegal border crossing would happen, the illegals problem could almost painlesslessly happen.

That is all that we are asking. The law be enforced, and sovereign borders be respected.



Yes, but the question remains as to whether or not this specific policy is the appropriate (or best) means of respecting sovereign borders. Moreover, even if building a wall was the best means of achieving our goals, the question remains as to whether our plan for building a wall is reasonable in the specifics (no holes at the land of rich Americans, wide enough to be effective, etc.). Seizing land from American citizens, for instance, to build the wall seems like a pretty noticeable flaw in the conception of the wall.

Plus, we don't want to suggest that a wall is an acceptable idea simply on the basis that the goals behind it are noble.

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

I'm lost
August 2004

FEB 22, 2008 03:09 AM

LSlice said:
I think's it's mainly meant as a fuckload of pork.



no, really? you think?

OneWithAll

OneWithAll

Charlton City, MA
October 2005

FEB 22, 2008 03:54 AM

anyone mention the snazzy "virtual" section of said retardo fence?


WASHINGTON - A 28-mile "virtual fence" that will use radars and surveillance cameras to try to catch people entering the country illegally has gotten final government approval.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff on Friday was to announce approval of the fence, built by the Boeing Co. and using technology the Bush administration plans to extend to other areas of the Arizona border, as well as sections of Texas. These projects could get under way as early as this summer, officials said.

The virtual fence is part of a national plan to secure the southwest border with physical barriers and high-tech detection capabilities intended to stop illegal immigrants on foot and drug smugglers in vehicles. As of Feb. 8, 295 miles of fencing had been constructed.

The virtual fence already is working.

On Feb. 13, an officer in a Tucson command center %u2014 70 miles from the border %u2014 noticed a group of about 100 people gathered at the border. The officer notified agents on the ground and in the air. Border Patrol caught 38 of the 100 people who tried to cross illegally, and the others went back into Mexico, a Homeland Security official said.

The virtual fence system includes 98-foot unmanned surveillance towers that are equipped with an array of sophisticated technology including radar, sensor devices and cameras capable of distinguishing people from cattle at a distance of about 10 miles. The cameras are powerful enough to tell group sizes and whether people are carrying backpacks that may contain weapons or drugs.

Last year the government withheld some of Boeing's payments for the system because technology the company used in the test project did not work properly. Boeing also was late in delivering the final product, known as Project 28. Because of this, the department received a $2 million credit from the company to go toward maintenance and logistical support of the system, the Homeland Security officials said.

The government paid Boeing $15 million of its initial $20 million contract before determining that there were glitches in the test project. The department gave a conditional acceptance in December.

Lawmakers have been skeptical of the product Boeing delivered.

"This is not the end of the Project 28 story," Rep. Christopher Carney, D-Pa., said in a statement Thursday. "We need to understand what went wrong with Project 28 to ensure that the mistakes of the past are not repeated and taxpayer dollars are not squandered."

Carney chairs the House Homeland Security management subcommittee.



note the author failed to mention how hundreds will be losing large portions of their land.

Gentleman_Loser

Gentleman_Loser

Montreal, QC
December 2003

FEB 22, 2008 06:36 AM

Also..Im sure someone mentioend this already...but "a mile *north* of the border"?? So the US of A is giving land to Mexico? That seems a bit weird.But maybe it's cause they feel bad for invading and taking so much of it away in the 19th century..
bok

Chainlink

Chainlink

Key West, FL
August 2005

FEB 22, 2008 06:47 AM

DevilsReject said:
will it be a pretty fence? or just that chainlink stuff? I vote for a nice wooden privacy fence, something in a durable oak, or pine, that can be stained so it will fit in with the landscape. Then we can plant flowers along our side of it, maybe so we can forget that we have an immigration problem.

OoOh! and an immigration "pond" every so often to go with the wooden privacy alien fence, with some loverly waterfalls, and koi!!



Are you saying Chainlink is not pretty ?

martinj_b52

martinj_b52

I'm lost
December 2006

FEB 22, 2008 06:50 AM

abracadabra said:

martinj_b52 said:

abracadabra said:
It's kinda funny in a sadistic way. We come to a foreign soil, then we kill most of the original inhabitants and take their land. Next we build the most powerful army and invent awful bombs to irradiate a foreign nation. Now we build fences to keep out what we once were, immigrants. Congratulations US.



They were killing EACH OTHER and ENSLAVING each other when we got here. "Native americans" were thousands of tribes, not one big happy family. And they were acting like nations-warring with each other.



Which obviously makes it okay to destroy their culture. Good argument!




No, but listening to people make native americans out to have been "pure as the wind driven snow" until WE showed up and started massacring them is highly, factually incorrect.

DhD_No_Pants

DhD_No_Pants

Katy, TX
May 2006

FEB 22, 2008 06:52 AM

martinj_b52 said:

abracadabra said:

martinj_b52 said:

abracadabra said:
It's kinda funny in a sadistic way. We come to a foreign soil, then we kill most of the original inhabitants and take their land. Next we build the most powerful army and invent awful bombs to irradiate a foreign nation. Now we build fences to keep out what we once were, immigrants. Congratulations US.



They were killing EACH OTHER and ENSLAVING each other when we got here. "Native americans" were thousands of tribes, not one big happy family. And they were acting like nations-warring with each other.



Which obviously makes it okay to destroy their culture. Good argument!




No, but listening to people make native americans out to have been "pure as the wind driven snow" until WE showed up and started massacring them is highly, factually incorrect.



Who in the fuck grew up saying or thinking that Natives flew around America on pink unicorns living off of sunshine and rainbows before we got here?

martinj_b52

martinj_b52

I'm lost
December 2006

FEB 22, 2008 06:52 AM

Uncognitive said:



On the plus side, you've learned how to link properly.

On the negative side, you're linking to a website that takes pride in publishing the "White Nationalist" take on immigration issues:

"Few people realize how recently we jumped the tracks. Up until the 1950s, whites took it for granted that this was a country for white people and would stay that way. They could not have imagined routine denigration of whites and obligatory bleating about the joys of being replaced by aliens. Every President up to Eisenhower would have agreed with me...It had nothing to do with immigrants competing for jobs. Americans liked the country whites had built and didn't want it mucked up."



Not familiar with the site. Googled immigration, read the article, wasnt racist, sooo.. I used it. Typical "criticize the messenger, ignore the message" bs.

Chainlink

Chainlink

Key West, FL
August 2005

FEB 22, 2008 06:56 AM

martinj_b52 said:

Uncognitive said:



On the plus side, you've learned how to link properly.

On the negative side, you're linking to a website that takes pride in publishing the "White Nationalist" take on immigration issues:

"Few people realize how recently we jumped the tracks. Up until the 1950s, whites took it for granted that this was a country for white people and would stay that way. They could not have imagined routine denigration of whites and obligatory bleating about the joys of being replaced by aliens. Every President up to Eisenhower would have agreed with me...It had nothing to do with immigrants competing for jobs. Americans liked the country whites had built and didn't want it mucked up."



Not familiar with the site. Googled immigration, read the article, wasnt racist, sooo.. I used it. Typical "criticize the messenger, ignore the message" bs.



No, it's typical "messenger doesn't know wtf he's talking about so he post the first thing that google barfs up to him".

whatever

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8

 ... 12

Next