Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83

 ... 484

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

DEC 17, 2007 10:41 PM

Lil_Louie said:
Thank you for the great article and all the information, it's definitely something "We the people" should be aware of. Would have been nice to get it a little earlier though, so us Americans could actually voice our opinions to the government (even though it wouldn't have done any good).

So what's the process of getting rid of the FCC?

...

Um, you were paying attention right? If the FCC didn't exist, then these companies could do whatever the fuck they wanted--something you presumably wouldn't like based on the first part of your statement. So then why the second part of your statement? Really, the two are dissonant.

Necia

Necia

San Francisco, CA
August 2005

DEC 17, 2007 11:18 PM

the mother Rove



I loved it!

malkav11

malkav11

Saint Paul, MN
July 2003

DEC 18, 2007 02:04 AM

emotedcreations said:

Lil_Louie said:
Thank you for the great article and all the information, it's definitely something "We the people" should be aware of. Would have been nice to get it a little earlier though, so us Americans could actually voice our opinions to the government (even though it wouldn't have done any good).

So what's the process of getting rid of the FCC?

...

Um, you were paying attention right? If the FCC didn't exist, then these companies could do whatever the fuck they wanted--something you presumably wouldn't like based on the first part of your statement. So then why the second part of your statement? Really, the two are dissonant.



Yep. It's like claiming the EPA isn't needed because Bush keeps appointing oil and lumber company executives to run it. We need the FCC. We just need them to be run by people who aren't completely opposed to its purpose.

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

DEC 18, 2007 04:11 AM

FearTheReaper said:

I'm starting to think they peel off of Karl Rove's body, slither away to do their own damage to the country and will later return to the mother Rove, with which they will merge in time for The Rapture.



I keep telling you; the Rapture already happened. That's why you guys are left with all the crap Republicans and fundies; God already took all the nice ones.

scylis

scylis

USA
November 2004

DEC 18, 2007 11:29 AM

SockPuppet said:

FearTheReaper said:

I'm starting to think they peel off of Karl Rove's body, slither away to do their own damage to the country and will later return to the mother Rove, with which they will merge in time for The Rapture.



I keep telling you; the Rapture already happened. That's why you guys are left with all the crap Republicans and fundies; God already took all the nice ones.



you assume there was nice ones to take.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

DEC 18, 2007 12:03 PM

It is over.


A bitterly divided Federal Communications Commission today approved a controversial new rule that loosens regulations on ownership of newspapers and broadcast stations in the same city.

The FCC voted 3-2 along partisan lines to ease a 32-year-old ban on so-called newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership. The plan crafted by FCC Chairman Kevin J. Martin would permit such combinations with some limits in the nation's 20 largest markets and allow them in some smaller markets if companies can show they will produce at least seven more hours of local news a week and are needed to help the media outlets survive.

scylis

scylis

USA
November 2004

DEC 18, 2007 12:15 PM

FearTheReaper said:
It is over.


A bitterly divided Federal Communications Commission today approved a controversial new rule that loosens regulations on ownership of newspapers and broadcast stations in the same city.

The FCC voted 3-2 along partisan lines to ease a 32-year-old ban on so-called newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership. The plan crafted by FCC Chairman Kevin J. Martin would permit such combinations with some limits in the nation's 20 largest markets and allow them in some smaller markets if companies can show they will produce at least seven more hours of local news a week and are needed to help the media outlets survive.



fuck!

not as bad as it could have been, but... fuck!

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

DEC 18, 2007 12:39 PM

Congress can still take action to hold it up. And some groups now say they will file lawsuits.

_kungfoo_

_kungfoo_

Los Angeles, CA
April 2005

DEC 18, 2007 01:01 PM

FearTheReaper said:
It is over.


A bitterly divided Federal Communications Commission today approved a controversial new rule that loosens regulations on ownership of newspapers and broadcast stations in the same city.

The FCC voted 3-2 along partisan lines to ease a 32-year-old ban on so-called newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership. The plan crafted by FCC Chairman Kevin J. Martin would permit such combinations with some limits in the nation's 20 largest markets and allow them in some smaller markets if companies can show they will produce at least seven more hours of local news a week and are needed to help the media outlets survive.



Also, the word 'Media' has been changed to ClearChannel.

wereduck

wereduck

I'm lost
July 2007

DEC 18, 2007 05:02 PM

FearTheReaper said:
It is over.


A bitterly divided Federal Communications Commission today approved a controversial new rule that loosens regulations on ownership of newspapers and broadcast stations in the same city.

The FCC voted 3-2 along partisan lines to ease a 32-year-old ban on so-called newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership. The plan crafted by FCC Chairman Kevin J. Martin would permit such combinations with some limits in the nation's 20 largest markets and allow them in some smaller markets if companies can show they will produce at least seven more hours of local news a week and are needed to help the media outlets survive.



The fact that Martin thinks more rampant conglomeracy will


ensure "competition, localism and diversity."


flabbergasts me. Does he even know what those words mean?

soulcompromise

soulcompromise

I'm lost
November 2006

DEC 18, 2007 08:37 PM

The problem that this causes used to be regulated by the fairness doctrine which was abolished during the Reagan presidency. It stated that broadcasters had to tell both sides of the story, not just the side they favored so that public opinion wouldn't be tampered with by reporters.

Toku666

Toku666

Columbus, OH
May 2004

DEC 18, 2007 11:02 PM

soulcompromise said:
The problem that this causes used to be regulated by the fairness doctrine which was abolished during the Reagan presidency. It stated that broadcasters had to tell both sides of the story, not just the side they favored so that public opinion wouldn't be tampered with by reporters.



Methinks you need to research that a little better.

The FCC needs the Phoenix treatment. It's been bad news for decades. This is a really bad step, though, on top of it all.

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

USA
May 2006

DEC 21, 2007 03:45 PM

Further proof of the fact that we need independent media: Within the first 15 minutes of the National News tonight (ABC) there is a long headline topic about the Spears trashery (version 2.0), but no mention of the Lakota Nation seceeding from the U.S.

wereduck

wereduck

I'm lost
July 2007

DEC 24, 2007 04:42 AM

coyotemike said:
Further proof of the fact that we need independent media: Within the first 15 minutes of the National News tonight (ABC) there is a long headline topic about the Spears trashery (version 2.0), but no mention of the Lakota Nation seceeding from the U.S.



I am glad I don't watch TV news. I probably would have snapped from such dumbassery and hurled a rock through the screen.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next