By the way, my comments regarding Clinton were posted in response to your assertion that Rudy's sex life had irreparably damaged his bid for the White House. I made no comparison between Clinton and Bush.
Even the most elementary attempts at accuracy seem to be beyond you.
No, sir, your short-term memory fails you: You were reminded that FTR's complaint was the misuse of public funds, and not the sex scandal in and of it's self.
Perhaps it was your intention to forget that part.
Typical Liberal comeback. Obviously the republicans are saving the taxpayers millions of dollars by removing the need for a costly investigation
Damn, that was funny.
Colinism said:
In all seriousness regardless of who is in charge the law is the law and must be followed and the correct steps must be taken to ensure this is followed through with.
I think there's an element of partisanship on both sides in terms of who gets investigated and for what. That being said, partisanship in prosecution (and the lack thereof) is unquestionably more egregious among Republicans.
I hate to agree with you, but only because I find it so hard to believe that people can be so that short sighted in their interests. The facts however say otherwise.
Wait! You guys are agreeing on this?
Shhh not so loud Zarth has already agreed with me twice this year and he hates it, if he realizes were in agreement a third time I don't know what he will do. Not to mention I made him laugh at a joke the other day. It might be too much for him.
wildswan
I'm lost
June 2006
DEC 08, 2007 04:26 AM