NEWS: Democrats Doing Their Best To Not Be Better Than Republicans

RudieCantFail said:

Buried deep in the largest domestic spending bill of the year is money for a library and museum honoring first ladies. The $130,000 was requested by the local congressman, Representative Ralph Regula, Republican of Ohio.

mrat said:
Wow , you are one smart mother-fucker ! Ohio should be happy that you are talking for them.

Colinism said:

Wait just a minute, her VP is an outer god yet thats clearly the sign of one of the Elder gods. Are you trying to get me to vote for a flip flopper who will say whatever she needs to to get votes? Hell in that case I might as well vote Great Old Ones party and throw my vote away to a bunch of enlightened morons who's party ideas are based upon action....... "When the stars are just right." WOOOO glad you can all be pulled away from your cosmic narcolepsy long enough to make a decision on something at some point in the future.

FearTheReaper said:
reprobate said:
No, you're a fucking retard, because you think creating a program for a field that traditionally excludes minorities at a public school populated by minorities in an impoverished minority neighborhood is bad.

That kind of stupid can't be cured by getting up early, which Charlie has been doing for three decades incidentally, not just when his bread and butter was on the line, Ben Franklin notwithstanding.

Oh my. I hadn't thought of that. Thanks for including me in on some obvious information that is totally irrelevant to a member of the House of Representatives creating his own presidential library.

And thank you for bolding the word "bad." It sort of made more of an inpact than the hacky use of "quotes."

reprobate said:

Apparently, we can add "relevant" to the list of words you don't really grasp the meaning of. See, putting your name on a desperately needed project isn't remotely the same as a presidential library, hence, the relevancy. Self aggrandizing, yes, corrupt no, relevant yes, equivalent to driving our economy on sub prime lending and bloated oil prices, starting an unwinnable war of aggression, declaring war on women homosexuals and minorities, also no. Your equating a traffic ticket with homicide here, and torturing the English language to do it.

I'll take my style tips from someone whose vocabulary actually approaches middle school standards, thanks.

reprobate said:

Apparently, we can add "relevant" to the list of words you don't really grasp the meaning of. See, putting your name on a desperately needed project isn't remotely the same as a presidential library, hence, the relevancy. Self aggrandizing, yes, corrupt no, relevant yes, equivalent to driving our economy on sub prime lending and bloated oil prices, starting an unwinnable war of aggression, declaring war on women homosexuals and minorities, also no. Your equating a traffic ticket with homicide here, and torturing the English language to do it.

I'll take my style tips from someone whose vocabulary actually approaches middle school standards, thanks.

FearTheReaper said:

Once again, you sad, odd character, we are not in a court of law. How do you get through every day?

Oh, and you are receiving style tips from someone who has been making a living as a writer and is actually sought after. You, however, are just a bit odd.

reprobate said:

That took two tries? I mean I'm a big fan of rewrites, but still.

At any rate, pretending that I'm foisting some semantic lawyer trick on the world by pointing out that your rants are devoid of basic subject matter knowledge or cogency doesn't mean you have a point. You said that naming a building after yourself was corrupt and the equivalent of GOP policy. Neither is true. That's not legalistic, that's common sense.

As for making your living as a TV writer, the less said the better.

Zarth said:

WIN.

FearTheReaper said:

Once again, you sad, odd character, we are not in a court of law. How do you get through every day?

Oh, and you are receiving style tips from someone who has been making a living as a writer and is actually sought after. You, however, are just a bit odd.

That took two tries? I mean I'm a big fan of rewrites, but still.

At any rate, pretending that I'm foisting some semantic lawyer trick on the world by pointing out that your rants are devoid of basic subject matter knowledge or cogency doesn't mean you have a point. You said that naming a building after yourself was corrupt and the equivalent of GOP policy. Neither is true. That's not legalistic, that's common sense.

As for making your living as a TV writer, the less said the better.

Oooo, snap. On both the first comment - and the second! Look at you, it's like a slam sandwich.

Actually your method is not to "point out my rants are devoid of subject matter," but rather to focus on one word and attack it without mercy because it does not fit your courtroom standard. You then use that first attack, move outward in an attempt to undermind the entire article. It's ridiculous everytime.

I feel sorry for your child. Being raised by someone with such strange way of viewing life will inevitably end with some sort of social retardatioin.

reprobate said:

Words mean what they mean. Facts are what they are. Someone as "sought after" as you ought to grasp that.

Aren't you five hundred miles from home telling jokes in a bar, trying to stay on the wagon? Way to be my parenting role model.