NEWS: Ron Paul: Annoying Cult Leader

What, exactly, do you think should be done about the anecdotal number of women who continually marry, become impregnated by, and then divorce wealthy men in order to cash in on that lucrative child support racket?

How many of these fertile femme fatales do you think there are, as opposed to single parents who are entitled to child support but are unable to collect because the biological father refuses to pay?

See, now that's actually thoughtful. I'm sad I missed it the first time.

I don't know if there's a technical rhetorical term or not, though one of the lawyers might. But it seems to me that it's done principally in order to reinforce a preexisting prejudice (e.g., that immigrants, welfare queens, and socialized medicine are going to take your money away), and does not itself thereby comprise a failure in its own right beyond fallacious reasoning.

Granted, fallacious reasoning may lead someone to that prejudice in the first place, but that's a chicken-and-egg argument.

YOu better hope she doesn't... I seriously doubt you'll like what she has to say.

I took you up on your offer/challenge, whatever it was, and asked both my mother-in-law and my best friend's mother (both of whom are nurses in maternity wards at different hospitals). My MIL laughed until she almost cried, and my best friend's mom advised me to stay away from any pills you offered.

Or both? Wait now, she did say "the" at some point, and that didn't offend me...

I must say, I am completely astonished at what this thread turned into. It was kinda funny at first, but once it got to the point that I realized she was actually serious, it took the fun out of it and replaced it with the scary. Happy Hallowe'en?

no, that was even condescending.

Oh, you're right... I missed that on the first read

grrowler please line up with the jury and mother from this case and leave Florida.
I'm glad other people have responded because what a nurse says/experiences is not the same thing as actual research.

I don't mean to be off topic but since this thread keeps surfacing I might as well comment. I don't actually think anyone will vote for Ron Paul. Not because he's racist, but because everyone's going to vote for Hillary Clinton, Obama, or Giuliani.

I guess I'm not part of "everyone."

Welcome to the land of 'nobodies' where I live.

Who are you going to vote for?

That's a secret.

Well, now it is no longer a secret.

Stolen from Somethingawful, but it was fitting for this thread

The libertarianism is a lie?

Besides the fact that he isn't getting nominated.

Bite your tongue, freedom hater!

Watch him invent his own party just so he can get attention paid to him for ten more months.

He has said he won't, lets just hope he's an honest man.

On the contrary. I'm assuming the Religious Right is serious and will back a tertiary man. If this becomes a four-way race, it might actually end up being interesting, since you'll have double the chance of vote-drain and the two main-party candidates might actually have to tell us something interesting instead of echo-chamber poll response rhetoric.

GOLD STANDARD IN LEADERSHIP ! RON PAUL 08 !



does anyone else find it funny that this is a silver coin ?