TOPICS:

Squire
I'm lost
November 2003
OCT 20, 2007 07:35 PM
oyaji said:
emotedcreations said:
oyaji said:
You should read this. Be clear about what you are getting yourself into, potentially. This is the worst case scenario. But you should know what it is.
I know, but thanks. I'm honestly not doing it for the money though. I'm doing it because law interests me as a subject. I may even get my JSD. It's really only an option at the moment. I have to take my LSAT first. I don't need to worry about any of this till then. Then again, maybe I'm just being naive, but I'm certainly not in it to make money. If I wanted to do that I could get into any number of my friends real estate/investment companies.
How are you going to pay for law school?
14 bucks the HARD way?

OCT 20, 2007 07:38 PM
oyaji said:
How are you going to pay for law school?
Family education fund. I come from a family of work-o-holics with a healthy respect for education (and hopefully scholarships).
OCT 20, 2007 07:46 PM
oyaji said:
Subrosa said:
emotedcreations said:
oyaji said:
emotedcreations said:
Subrosa said:
Success is a relative proposition, my friend.
Fer realz. If I could do environmental law in the Keys and make $50K a year, I'd consider myself more "successful" than anyone living in NY or LA (no offense to whomever--like you said, it's all relative) making 2, 3, 4 times that.
You are off by an order of magnitude.
I don't doubt it for a sec**, but the point remains. ![]()
But you know the saying "to each their own."
----------------
A lot of the schools I'm looking at start out with. w/ 100+ avg. starting salaries.
The average starting salaries are total horseshit. Don't believe them one iota.
They are accurate for some schools. The "right" schools.
No, they ain't. The average starting salaries are only for those folks who
a) have a job, and
B) have a good enough job that they care to report their salary to their alma mater
It's a racket, it's bullshit, it's entirely skewed. Trust me on this. Adjust downward accordingly.
OCT 20, 2007 07:56 PM
. . . and don't expect to live in the Keys on 50k a year either.
OCT 20, 2007 09:06 PM
In regards to the original post, it is true that Justice Kennedy is a strong Catholic. That matters only if he considers the position of the Church, which is that capital punishment is wrong,
It should be noted that the Chief, Justice Scalia, Justice Thomas, and Justice Alito are also strong Catholics.
By the way, I have a JD but have never practiced. Seemed like it was a lot more fun to trade securities. I got your forty hour work weeks right here!
OCT 20, 2007 09:12 PM
pascipio said:
In regards to the original post, it is true that Justice Kennedy is a strong Catholic. That matters only if he considers the position of the Church, which is that capital punishment is wrong,
It should be noted that the Chief, Justice Scalia, Justice Thomas, and Justice Alito are also strong Catholics.
By the way, I have a JD but have never practiced. Seemed like it was a lot more fun to trade securities. I got your forty hour work weeks right here!
Someone didn't pass the BAR.
OCT 20, 2007 09:39 PM
oyaji said:
emotedcreations said:
oyaji said:
How are you going to pay for law school?
Family education fund. I come from a family of work-o-holics with a healthy respect for education (and hopefully scholarships).
That is good, because those of us who come out of law school with mountains of debt with them shiny, Ivy League degrees don't have the luxury of some job where you make $50k. You wouldn't be able to service the debt.
I really didn't mean to come off like an ass. I was just trying provide an alternate example of a way to make a living, but given my ignorance on the subject I suppose I just look like a dick (although I wasn't suggesting, in my example, that an expensive IVY degree was required for happiness, I think that was a inference on your part). Apologies all around...
And for those of you paying attention FUCK LSU!
OCT 20, 2007 10:31 PM
oyaji said:
Subrosa said:
oyaji said:
Subrosa said:
emotedcreations said:
oyaji said:
The average starting salaries are total horseshit. Don't believe them one iota.
They are accurate for some schools. The "right" schools.
No, they ain't. The average starting salaries are only for those folks who
a) have a job, and
B) have a good enough job that they care to report their salary to their alma mater
It's a racket, it's bullshit, it's entirely skewed. Trust me on this. Adjust downward accordingly.
Dude. The averages at schools in the top five of USNWR are totally accurate. Most people go off and make cash at firms for a few years to service their ridiculous debts.
Again, no they ain't. Your results are not "average".
OCT 20, 2007 10:40 PM
emotedcreations said:
pascipio said:
In regards to the original post, it is true that Justice Kennedy is a strong Catholic. That matters only if he considers the position of the Church, which is that capital punishment is wrong,
It should be noted that the Chief, Justice Scalia, Justice Thomas, and Justice Alito are also strong Catholics.
By the way, I have a JD but have never practiced. Seemed like it was a lot more fun to trade securities. I got your forty hour work weeks right here!
Someone didn't pass the BAR.
Never took the BAR. Went off to get an MPP.
OCT 20, 2007 10:51 PM
pascipio said:
emotedcreations said:
pascipio said:
In regards to the original post, it is true that Justice Kennedy is a strong Catholic. That matters only if he considers the position of the Church, which is that capital punishment is wrong,
It should be noted that the Chief, Justice Scalia, Justice Thomas, and Justice Alito are also strong Catholics.
By the way, I have a JD but have never practiced. Seemed like it was a lot more fun to trade securities. I got your forty hour work weeks right here!
Someone didn't pass the BAR.
Never took the BAR. Went off to get an MPP.
I was just teasing, I hope you didn't take that seriously.
OCT 21, 2007 08:56 AM
Those statistics are compiled by admissions officers looking to up their average for USNWP. It is in their own interest to fudge that data and leave out the people who are looking for work and/or don't choose to report their salaries. Every school in the country does it. I'm sure the top 10 schools do to. I'll grant that there are probably a higher proportion of people from the top ten making market rate coming from those schools, but I'm sure it's not 95%. Hell, I work with enough people from those schools in my line of work that aren't making NY market rate that I know that's an overestimate.
OCT 21, 2007 02:39 PM
Sigh... this was an interesting thread, until the lawyers started arguing like my kids...
I do have a quick question for those who argue that the death penalty is not a deterrant - is jail a deterrant? That has never been a very good argument, as far as I'm concerned, because the same thing applies to jail - should we stop putting criminals in jail too? Of course not.
I'll be honest, I don't really know where I stand on the death penalty issue, likely because I live in a country where it isn't legal anyway. But while I think there is probably a revenge aspect in it for some advocates, I think others are just worried about true psychos getting out of jail and repeating their crimes, which is always a risk if the criminal is jailed.
This is why I'm not sure where I stand... I hate to think of someone like Paul Bernardo or his psycho ex-wife walking around free (although, she already is), but at the same time, I shudder to think of someone like Guy Paul Morin being wrongly executed.
OCT 21, 2007 03:50 PM
The death penalty is a really tricky thing, I have no problem if it's carried out where there is evidence piled to the ceiling irrefutable evidence, otherwise life in prison is just fine. The main issue with the prison system that I have is that it's not designed to do anything but store people. They don't get an education, rehabilitation, or any job skills. They do however get to make more criminal and gang contacts while they are in there as well as being forced in many cases to join a gang simply to survive. This is counterproductive to say the least.
OCT 21, 2007 04:20 PM
bald_eagle said:
Colinism said:
The death penalty is a really tricky thing, I have no problem if it's carried out where there is evidence piled to the ceiling irrefutable evidence, otherwise life in prison is just fine.
I would add that "special circumstances" should be present. Whenever I find myself pondering the death penalty, I think of people like Stephen Judy. And the existence of the death penalty serves a purpose in plea-bargaining. Being able to take it "off the table" allows us to obtain guilty pleas where we would otherwise have to try a case where the evidence is overwhelming.
The main issue with the prison system that I have is that it's not designed to do anything but store people. They don't get an education, rehabilitation, or any job skills. They do however get to make more criminal and gang contacts while they are in there as well as being forced in many cases to join a gang simply to survive. This is counterproductive to say the least.
I agree with you. As some have observed, the only thing prison demonstrably cures is heterosexuality. But here's the problem. It costs money to improve the prison system, and voters don't like to spend it there.
See now considering the rights pathological hatred of gays that last statement right there would have gotten you billions in funding to stop the spread of the gheys in prison.
OCT 21, 2007 05:21 PM
Colinism said:
bald_eagle said:
Colinism said:
The death penalty is a really tricky thing, I have no problem if it's carried out where there is evidence piled to the ceiling irrefutable evidence, otherwise life in prison is just fine.
I would add that "special circumstances" should be present. Whenever I find myself pondering the death penalty, I think of people like Stephen Judy. And the existence of the death penalty serves a purpose in plea-bargaining. Being able to take it "off the table" allows us to obtain guilty pleas where we would otherwise have to try a case where the evidence is overwhelming.
The main issue with the prison system that I have is that it's not designed to do anything but store people. They don't get an education, rehabilitation, or any job skills. They do however get to make more criminal and gang contacts while they are in there as well as being forced in many cases to join a gang simply to survive. This is counterproductive to say the least.
I agree with you. As some have observed, the only thing prison demonstrably cures is heterosexuality. But here's the problem. It costs money to improve the prison system, and voters don't like to spend it there.
See now considering the rights pathological hatred of gays that last statement right there would have gotten you billions in funding to stop the spread of the gheys in prison.
Reality check, dude.
OCT 21, 2007 05:24 PM
SockPuppet said:
Colinism said:
bald_eagle said:
Colinism said:
The death penalty is a really tricky thing, I have no problem if it's carried out where there is evidence piled to the ceiling irrefutable evidence, otherwise life in prison is just fine.
I would add that "special circumstances" should be present. Whenever I find myself pondering the death penalty, I think of people like Stephen Judy. And the existence of the death penalty serves a purpose in plea-bargaining. Being able to take it "off the table" allows us to obtain guilty pleas where we would otherwise have to try a case where the evidence is overwhelming.
The main issue with the prison system that I have is that it's not designed to do anything but store people. They don't get an education, rehabilitation, or any job skills. They do however get to make more criminal and gang contacts while they are in there as well as being forced in many cases to join a gang simply to survive. This is counterproductive to say the least.
I agree with you. As some have observed, the only thing prison demonstrably cures is heterosexuality. But here's the problem. It costs money to improve the prison system, and voters don't like to spend it there.
See now considering the rights pathological hatred of gays that last statement right there would have gotten you billions in funding to stop the spread of the gheys in prison.
Reality check, dude.
Check your sarcasm meter it's obviously not working.
OCT 21, 2007 05:32 PM
bald_eagle said:
On the contrary. The right wing thinks gays belong in prison to begin with.
But they also believe it's a sinful life choice, so they would be stopping people from choosing this sinful path.
OCT 22, 2007 12:08 AM
bald_eagle said:
Colinism said:
The death penalty is a really tricky thing, I have no problem if it's carried out where there is evidence piled to the ceiling irrefutable evidence, otherwise life in prison is just fine.
I would add that "special circumstances" should be present. Whenever I find myself pondering the death penalty, I think of people like Stephen Judy. And the existence of the death penalty serves a purpose in plea-bargaining. Being able to take it "off the table" allows us to obtain guilty pleas where we would otherwise have to try a case where the evidence is overwhelming.
The main issue with the prison system that I have is that it's not designed to do anything but store people. They don't get an education, rehabilitation, or any job skills. They do however get to make more criminal and gang contacts while they are in there as well as being forced in many cases to join a gang simply to survive. This is counterproductive to say the least.
I agree with you. As some have observed, the only thing prison demonstrably cures is heterosexuality. But here's the problem. It costs money to improve the prison system, and voters don't like to spend it there.
Sure they do... but only if it's spent on more walls, more bars, and more guards.
Name the book... win a prize! ![]()
OCT 22, 2007 12:10 AM
oyaji said:
Clidna said:
Sigh... this was an interesting thread, until the lawyers started arguing like my kids...
I do have a quick question for those who argue that the death penalty is not a deterrant - is jail a deterrant? That has never been a very good argument, as far as I'm concerned, because the same thing applies to jail - should we stop putting criminals in jail too? Of course not.
I'll be honest, I don't really know where I stand on the death penalty issue, likely because I live in a country where it isn't legal anyway. But while I think there is probably a revenge aspect in it for some advocates, I think others are just worried about true psychos getting out of jail and repeating their crimes, which is always a risk if the criminal is jailed.
This is why I'm not sure where I stand... I hate to think of someone like Paul Bernardo or his psycho ex-wife walking around free (although, she already is), but at the same time, I shudder to think of someone like Guy Paul Morin being wrongly executed.
It's not that it isn't a deterrent. It's that there is no evidence that it is a greater deterrent than jail. So, given that jail is cheaper and also you can release someone erroneously imprisoned but you can't un-execute someone erroneously put to death, and given that the error rates in capital convictions are about 70%, why bother with capital punishment when it is not a greater deterrent than jail.
Fair enough... where did you get the info on the error rates, BTW? It's something I'd like to read up on.

Squire
I'm lost
November 2003
OCT 22, 2007 06:26 AM
Clidna said:
oyaji said:
Clidna said:
Sigh... this was an interesting thread, until the lawyers started arguing like my kids...
I do have a quick question for those who argue that the death penalty is not a deterrant - is jail a deterrant? That has never been a very good argument, as far as I'm concerned, because the same thing applies to jail - should we stop putting criminals in jail too? Of course not.
I'll be honest, I don't really know where I stand on the death penalty issue, likely because I live in a country where it isn't legal anyway. But while I think there is probably a revenge aspect in it for some advocates, I think others are just worried about true psychos getting out of jail and repeating their crimes, which is always a risk if the criminal is jailed.
This is why I'm not sure where I stand... I hate to think of someone like Paul Bernardo or his psycho ex-wife walking around free (although, she already is), but at the same time, I shudder to think of someone like Guy Paul Morin being wrongly executed.
It's not that it isn't a deterrent. It's that there is no evidence that it is a greater deterrent than jail. So, given that jail is cheaper and also you can release someone erroneously imprisoned but you can't un-execute someone erroneously put to death, and given that the error rates in capital convictions are about 70%, why bother with capital punishment when it is not a greater deterrent than jail.
Fair enough... where did you get the info on the error rates, BTW? It's something I'd like to read up on.
Usually those who commit capital crimes don't exactly sit back and weigh the consequences prior to doing so.
OCT 22, 2007 12:02 PM
Clidna said:
oyaji said:
Clidna said:
Sigh... this was an interesting thread, until the lawyers started arguing like my kids...
I do have a quick question for those who argue that the death penalty is not a deterrant - is jail a deterrant? That has never been a very good argument, as far as I'm concerned, because the same thing applies to jail - should we stop putting criminals in jail too? Of course not.
I'll be honest, I don't really know where I stand on the death penalty issue, likely because I live in a country where it isn't legal anyway. But while I think there is probably a revenge aspect in it for some advocates, I think others are just worried about true psychos getting out of jail and repeating their crimes, which is always a risk if the criminal is jailed.
This is why I'm not sure where I stand... I hate to think of someone like Paul Bernardo or his psycho ex-wife walking around free (although, she already is), but at the same time, I shudder to think of someone like Guy Paul Morin being wrongly executed.
It's not that it isn't a deterrent. It's that there is no evidence that it is a greater deterrent than jail. So, given that jail is cheaper and also you can release someone erroneously imprisoned but you can't un-execute someone erroneously put to death, and given that the error rates in capital convictions are about 70%, why bother with capital punishment when it is not a greater deterrent than jail.
Fair enough... where did you get the info on the error rates, BTW? It's something I'd like to read up on.
Sorry never mind... I found the link a few pages back.
OCT 24, 2007 10:20 AM
As always, The Onion does it best.
Lethal Injection Ban Leads To Rise In Back-Alley Lethal Injections
TALLAHASSEE, FL%u2014To all outward appearances, "Kevin" is a typical Southern state governor. He enjoys vetoing bills, attending ribbon-cutting ceremonies, and hanging out with friends. But the recent suspension of lethal injections in 10 states has put Kevin's political life in serious jeopardy. Unable to wait for the U.S. Supreme Court to determine whether the practice constitutes cruel and unusual punishment, Kevin, like many young governors who find themselves saddled with an unwanted death row inmate, has been forced to take desperate action and obtain an illegal back-alley lethal injection.
"It was awful," said Kevin, who still suffers from nightmares after witnessing the prisoner die in horrible agony without any anesthesia. "We did it on an old card table. All the equipment was really rusty and dirty. I just closed my eyes and prayed for it to be over."
"I had my whole political career ahead of me," Kevin continued through tears. "If I didn't do it, the voters would have left me. I couldn't see any other way."
Lethal injection has long been a polarizing issue and, according to proponents of the banned procedure, Kevin's story is becoming all too common. Dr. Daniel Blecker, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, and expert on capital punishment, said that the illegal back-alley execution trend will only intensify if the ban is upheld.
"Every day more and more governors find themselves in dank basements or filthy garages with a retinue of prison guards and a convicted killer," said Blecker, referring to testimony he has gathered from more than a dozen politicians who have participated in illegal lethal injections. "In extreme cases, the inexperienced executioners will inject the prisoners with cheap, common household poisons, such as oven cleaner and bleach, instead of the suggested sodium thiopental, Pavulon, and potassium chloride cocktail that a state-licensed executioner would use."
Blecker also cited reports of back-alley injections performed so hastily that no last meal was provided.
"The reality of the situation is that you can't legislate lethal injections away," Blecker said. "If governors can't inhumanely execute prisoners legally in prisons, they're going to turn elsewhere for the procedure. More often than not with tragic results."
Since early last year, a growing number of states have indefinitely postponed the termination of prisoners by lethal injection until the Supreme Court rules on the matter. According to a recent study conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice, an estimated 14 inmates have been killed monthly by botched illegal injections since the ban took effect, compared with an average of 12 killed each month in successful illegal executions.
Karen Walton, a therapist who counsels distraught governors following traumatic illegal lethal injections, said that pressure from constituents and the stigma of being seen as soft on crime often contribute to the politicians' desperation.
"Many of these poor gentlemen find themselves in situations like this again and again," Walton said. "I've even heard stories of governors performing crude, life-threatening euthanasia themselves."
Proponents of the ban, however, have dismissed cases such as Kevin's as isolated incidences. Some anti%u2013lethal injection advocates believe that removing the option of legal lethal injections will force state politicians to consider alternatives for dealing with death row inmates, such as life imprisonment, rehabilitation, or the gas chamber.
"Governors have consistently abused state-sponsored euthanasia, using it as a sort of barbaric crime-control method," said Lillith Tinsely, a spokesperson for Amnesty International, the organization responsible for convincing the Supreme Court to reexamine lethal injection. "Ethically, the procedure should only be used as a last resort, such as in the case of rapists or convicts who have committed incest. Otherwise lethal injection is murder, any way you look at it."
Regardless of the outcome of the Supreme Court inquiry and the continued debate over how a life on death row should end, it is in some ways too late for politicians like Kevin%u2014who will be forced to live forever with the memory of standing in a windowless, dimly lit room as a serial killer draws his last tortured breath.
"What did I do to deserve this?" Kevin said, choking back sobs. "I can't eat, I can barely sleep at night. Sometimes I feel like just ending it all. I don't know how I'm ever going to go through this again next Thursday."
OCT 24, 2007 01:06 PM
I believe in the death penalty but I also tend to think that it is cruel and unusual to die by electrocution or gas. Lethal injection sounds more humane but I did read somewhere that if the procedure goes wrong the detainee would not be able to alert the executioners of any kind of pain. Still I don't think it should be an even trade, one life for another, which I think is what they're trying to avoid by using those methods.
Who are the types of people who kill people? The statistics tell you that it's mostly uneducated minorities committing murder anyway. I'm not sure if that's any consolation or not, but it does help you put into perspective who is affected by capital punishment laws. I don't think that it's a race issue, that is just a product of a racially ignorant society. It's just another sad fact... I think it should apply to rape as well.








Subrosa
San Francisco, CA
July 2004
OCT 20, 2007 07:28 PM