Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92

 ... 487

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

TheCoolerKing

TheCoolerKing

NEWSWIRE

Los Angeles, CA

OCT 05, 2007 11:42 AM

I agree.

It's definitely not a "people" but, yeah, I don't see why that should stop someone from giving it stuff...

d20

d20

San Francisco, CA
September 2003

OCT 05, 2007 11:43 AM

Cigarette said:

thefreak said:

"The question is: Are chimps things without interests, or persons with interests?" Balluch said.



Seems like a false dichotomy to me. You can have laws that give animals rights and protections without declaring them people.



i thought the same thing... it seems as though the chimp is a being with interests, given that it's intelligent enough to have interests, but it isn't a person.

ash67

ash67

USA
October 2005

OCT 05, 2007 02:33 PM

Seems like something that had good intentions, but went the wrong route. Hopefully they will find one that works out logically and legally.

_Elichrusos

_Elichrusos

Australia
November 2004

OCT 05, 2007 08:12 PM

Rickets said:
I've fucked lots of chimps and have yet to produce any viable offspring, so by most biological criteria, I'd say they're not people.

Just dead sexy.



Yeah, only but that criteria I'm not people either.

Cigarette

Cigarette

Cleveland, OH
April 2004

OCT 06, 2007 06:16 AM

j1mdot said:
Hail to the Chimp makes a very important point, a 100-150 fully grown chimp can very easily tear your limbs off. I've yet to meet a person that could eat someone's face... and still retain all of their rights, at least.



One could, however, shoot someone in the face and retain all of their rights.

comrade

comrade

Portland, OR
April 2004

OCT 07, 2007 03:57 AM

What a lot of people don't seem to get is that there's a huge legal difference between "person" and "human." A corporation is a "person" inasmuch as it has its own unique concerns, responsibilities, and some measure of self-determination (in the form of a board of directors), even though nobody would ever confuse it for a human being.

Similarly, a chimp (and arguably many other animals) could be considered a "person" without redrawing the species lines.

Honestly, do you think that "chimps are not people LOL" is really news to the lawyers and judges involved?

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next