NEWS: Whore Lover Gets Money For Anti-Evolution Program

I hate people. Christbots to be specific.

What I hate even more is that the gov't is actually letting this shit fly.

It's probably not your fault as much as my humour chip being broken due to meds.

Did someone say Origin?

man, life is brutal.

Actually, that would not be a better graph. Obviously, Cuba's currency is not worth as much as the United States, just as the US's currency is not worth as much as the United Kingdom's. However, each of those countries' currency has a different level of buying power domestically than they do internationally.

Shown as a percentage of a country's GDP, rather than as dollar amounts, the graph shows how much of it's total resources a country is willing to devote towards the education of its citizens.

Oh crap! Where did I put my anti-prior device?!!

Wow. Just wow.

I mean, I'm a Christian (who also believes in evolution ), and I find all this right-wing "devilution" (as Mike Huckabee called it) bullshit to be appalling.

This is disappointing. I grow more sick of this country every day.

I just had to post this...



Fortunately in the UK we don't have this problem...our politicians are too busy claming back...ahem... expenses!

I definitely thought Stargate pulled off an anti-fundamentalist bent than most others.

Neocons prefer non-thinking types.

Wait...

You want us to spin the numbers to suit your argument? RudieCantFail already pointed out the flaw with how you argued the statistics should be shown, but I can't believe you were too lazy to even go and find the information and present it yourself.

No... I'm kidding. I can believe it.

Ah, which one was that?

Source, please.

Well, that's true. Still, there are problems with a GDP base, too. Partly because the GDP / population ration is not constant. If china spends the same portion of its GDP on education as the USA, but china has four times as many citizens, and even more than four times as many children, the conclusions based on a GDP graph would be... incomplete, to say the least. And none of this goes into the (valid, as far as I can tell) concerns about just how accurate GDP is as a measure of economic prowess. I'd really like to see both figures, and make what conclusions I can rather than using either single flawed piece.