Pookah said: If'n I weren't so smitten with ava, I'd suggest that Helter and ava meet and fall in love. As it is, though...Watch it, Helter, or I'll make some other aboninable symantic goof!
And rep? Baby, your cavalry charge was just as late with Custer... I still admire your mind, though.
Honey, my sword and spurs are still in the closet. If I feel the need to get them, you won't need multiple posts to notice.
And incidentally, Custer didn't charge. He sat there and got slaughtered unmounted.
This person has not been covicted. So, then, no sentence. That's the first lesson I learned from my Libetarian boot camp, in as many words.... I agree with Helter that this person should not be tried and convicted by consensus... or, at least, an unknowing one.... What I was hoping to get an answer to, rep, was this and yeah, it's a wee bit off topic; if this guy were convicted of the aforementioned charges, should he be locked up for life? That was what I was hoping to get an answer from Helter to. Wrong forum? Perhaps. But we all digress, right?
So there you have it. No fighting words, no animosity. I just had a question and I phrased it poorly in my original post.
Now give me a fucking answer!
He was charged with endangering the welfare of a minor and trespass.
No sex crimes.
No felonys.
These are minor misdemeanors punishiable by 60 days in jail.
Even though this guy didn't do any molesting on the child, the whole point of this that you don't "borrow" somebody's kid without permission. This guy didn't ask the parent, and luckily it was for non-criminal reasons, and the child was un harmed. Unfunately,, nowadays when a kid goes missing, it is automaticly considered the worst, as in a molesting kidnapper.
I really would have hated being in his shoes when the Hell's Angels got to him first befor the cops did. I mean, what was going through this guy's mind, " OOO, I wanna take pictures of this child, I'm sure the daddy that's a Hell's Angel member wouldn't mind" "It's not like I was messing with his bike or anything" " Besides, she'll be back befor they even notice she's gone"
What a dumbass.
80
tarbaby
I'm lost
April 2003
SEP 06, 2003 03:52 AM
flb0y said: Even though this guy didn't do any molesting on the child, the whole point of this that you don't "borrow" somebody's kid without permission. This guy didn't ask the parent, and luckily it was for non-criminal reasons, and the child was un harmed. Unfunately,, nowadays when a kid goes missing, it is automaticly considered the worst, as in a molesting kidnapper.
I really would have hated being in his shoes when the Hell's Angels got to him first befor the cops did. I mean, what was going through this guy's mind, " OOO, I wanna take pictures of this child, I'm sure the daddy that's a Hell's Angel member wouldn't mind" "It's not like I was messing with his bike or anything" " Besides, she'll be back befor they even notice she's gone"
What a dumbass.
oh my god i love you. this exactly what i was trying to say all of this time and you put it into words for me. seriously, you hit it right on the head!!! thank you
ava said:
oh my god i love you. this exactly what i was trying to say all of this time and you put it into words for me. seriously, you hit it right on the head!!! thank you
flb0y said: Even though this guy didn't do any molesting on the child, the whole point of this that you don't "borrow" somebody's kid without permission. This guy didn't ask the parent, and luckily it was for non-criminal reasons, and the child was un harmed. Unfunately,, nowadays when a kid goes missing, it is automaticly considered the worst, as in a molesting kidnapper.
I really would have hated being in his shoes when the Hell's Angels got to him first befor the cops did. I mean, what was going through this guy's mind, " OOO, I wanna take pictures of this child, I'm sure the daddy that's a Hell's Angel member wouldn't mind" "It's not like I was messing with his bike or anything" " Besides, she'll be back befor they even notice she's gone"
What a dumbass.
If thats what happened, sure, but from everything I've read, it seems to me that what really happened was nothing more than a miscommunication with the kind of people who leave their nine year old daughter unsupervised backstage at a Grateful Dead show
If thats what happened, sure, but from everything I've read, it seems to me that what really happened was nothing more than a miscommunication with the kind of people who leave their nine year old daughter unsupervised backstage at a Grateful Dead show
This was not the company picnic.
True, When
I was a kid my folks didn't let me out of their sight when we where in public places.
Phish's Mike Gordon was cleared of child endangerment charges this morning, more than a month after the bassist was found alone with a nine-year-old girl in a boathouse during a concert by the Dead at Jones Beach Amphitheater in Wantagh, New York.
"I am glad all the charges against me have been dismissed and I can put this misunderstanding behind me," he said in a statement. "I am grateful for the support I've received from my friends and fans."
After the August 11th incident Gordon, 38, claimed that he was taking art pictures of the girl.
The Nassau County District Attorney's office concluded that police had probable cause to arrest Gordon but that the misdemeanor endangerment charges were not provable beyond a reasonable doubt. "Mr. Gordon appeared at the arraignment this morning and the case was dismissed," spokesman Rick Hinshaw said. A violation charge of trespassing was also dismissed. The charges could have resulted in a year of jail time.
Following the incident, a joint statement credited to Gordon and the girl's family was released by Phish's label, Elektra Records. It read, "We have had several discussions regarding the situation that occurred at Jones Beach. It is now clear to all involved that this was an unfortunate misunderstanding, and we look forward to putting this matter behind us." An Elektra spokesperson could not confirm at the time whether a monetary settlement was reached between the parties.
another wire story included most of the above and the following paragraph:
Hinshaw said Gordon made no statements at the arraignment, which was also attended by the girl's parents. The girl's father -- who, along with Gordon, was an invited backstage guest -- was identified in media reports as a leader of a local Hell's Angels Motorcycle chapter.
Exactly, so what's the fuss about wrongly accusing him of child abuse, the band Phish has corrupted the minds of many young kids.
Actually the ones that should be imprisoned for child endangerment are those damn hippie parents that take their kids to the shows and let them run around in the mud while they toke up and eat shrooms. DAMN HIPPIES!!!!!
what's wrong with getting high and letting your kids run around with pedophiles on the loose?
whether or not this guy is convicted of a pedo crime, has no sway in my opinion. if your taking pictures of a kid at 1:00am alone, for any reason , YOU ARE A PEDOPHILE!!!!!!!
EvilEmpire said: whether or not this guy is convicted of a pedo crime, has no sway in my opinion. if your taking pictures of a kid at 1:00am alone, for any reason , YOU ARE A PEDOPHILE!!!!!!!
Wow, don't bother you with the facts, eh?
As noted above, all charges have been dropped, and all parties involoved, including the girl's parents, say it was a misunderstanding.
EvilEmpire said: whether or not this guy is convicted of a pedo crime, has no sway in my opinion. if your taking pictures of a kid at 1:00am alone, for any reason , YOU ARE A PEDOPHILE!!!!!!!
Wow, don't bother you with the facts, eh?
As noted above, all charges have been dropped, and all parties involoved, including the girl's parents, say it was a misunderstanding.
i thought the phish taking pictures of the girl at 1:00am alone was a fact.
EvilEmpire said: whether or not this guy is convicted of a pedo crime, has no sway in my opinion. if your taking pictures of a kid at 1:00am alone, for any reason , YOU ARE A PEDOPHILE!!!!!!!
Wow, don't bother you with the facts, eh?
As noted above, all charges have been dropped, and all parties involoved, including the girl's parents, say it was a misunderstanding.
i thought the phish taking pictures of the girl at 1:00am alone was a fact.
Listen to yourself. Please. You are saying that a person taking a picture of a child at 1am is a pedophile.
see above for your exact quote.
Every police officer, prosecutor and DA's office in America would disagree.
EvilEmpire said: whether or not this guy is convicted of a pedo crime, has no sway in my opinion. if your taking pictures of a kid at 1:00am alone, for any reason , YOU ARE A PEDOPHILE!!!!!!!
Wow, don't bother you with the facts, eh?
As noted above, all charges have been dropped, and all parties involoved, including the girl's parents, say it was a misunderstanding.
i thought the phish taking pictures of the girl at 1:00am alone was a fact.
Listen to yourself. Please. You are saying that a person taking a picture of a child at 1am is a pedophile.
see above for your exact quote.
Every police officer, prosecutor and DA's office in America would disagree.
Please defend your logic here, if you can.
i am saying that every police officer, prosecutor and DA's oppion doesn't influence mine, if you are taking pictures of a child at 1:00am, alone you are a pedophile
Is English your first language? I'm not being snarky, it just occurred to me that it might not be the case.
i thought this thread was about the phish incident, if your so alone that you want to know personal info about strangers, maybe you should try one of those dating web sites, i'm not trying to be snarky it just occured to me
the phish member is rich, he has the power to do almost anything he wants to do within the law. He chose to photograph a child alone (i could see if it was his or a relatives, it wouldn't be as wrong in my opion) at one am alone. This behaviour in my opinion makes him a pedophile. Whether or not i have the law's backing on this makes no difference to me. If that is not clear enough, then i guess it's ritual suicide for me
code said: It's not simply that you don't have the law's backing. It's that you don't have any backing.
You've been repeatedly asked to show some thinking behind your conclusion, but you've refused. You've simply stated a bunch of unrelated facts and leaped directly to the conclusion.
Yes, we're fully aware that your opinion is that he is anyway, but since you've also conclusively shown you are not entitled to an opinion, that doesn't count for much.
not entitled to an opion? ok, all heil code, the new Fuehrer, when does the train come to pick me up for my exercess
Les said: it has since come to light that the girls mother gave permission and knew where the girl was the whole time. The father didn't, freaked out, found them and beat the hell out of Gordon. Gordon is now sueing the father for assault. And yes, the girl had her fucking clothes on.
[Edited on Sep 04, 2003 by les]
A true testament to the dangerous powers of the mighty force known as spin.
Pookah
Pitcairn
August 2003
SEP 06, 2003 01:09 AM