SuicidePuppies said:
oh shit, dude, that mugshot. i can't stop laughing.
Between the facepaint, the tan, the subtle suggestion of sand/glitter on his awesomely tribal tattooed shoulders, and the smug shit-eating smile on his face, It is pretty much the best thing ever, is it not?
reprobate said:
No. I'm not a burner, and frankly, the idea of spending a week in the high desert with a tens of thousands of really high people fully offsets the amusement value for me. Ain't going.
That said, the core idea is not a hard concept to grasp. It's called make your own fun and be amused by others that do likewise. It's not about chaos or freedom from responsibility. It's about freedom from stricture. There are rules, there are customs and there are manners. Destroying something that others worked to create isn't impromptu, or free form, or creative or provocative. It is the expression of a juvenile, drug addled moron, who I'm sure is very much less cheerful now.
But isn't the man going to be destroyed anyway? Isn't the difference in this case, when it was destroyed? And by whom? Is there a usual group (I'm assuming the people that created the structure) that are the ones designated to burn it? If that is the case, I don't understand why the Burning Man is the center attraction -- to me, that seems counterintuitive, like it undermines the individuality and importance of the different installations/exhibits around the rest of the playa, made by other people -- to give one a hierarchical superiority over the others.
The burn is the central unifying event of the festival. It is no more or less important than anything else, it just gives cohesion to the event and the community. Thats why its called burning man. And yes, there is a large group of people who work very hard to make it happen, and safely. So yeah, the difference is when it was burned and by whom and also how, but those are very significant differences. It was burned as a petulant anarchic fuck you, by a guy with no right to do it in a flagrantly dangerous manner.
Well Black Rock City is a community, it's not just random chaos. Most of the stuff out there is the result of months of planning. The man represents the unity of the community, he watches over us, he guides us (he's in the exact center of the city, so he is a very important navigational tool), he unites us.
When the man burns, that's when the place turns in to complete chaos. While everyone's watching the man burn, and it is quite spectacular and for some, emotional, there are people running through the city, stealing all of the road signs.
The last two days are very disorienting and confusing, and quite melancholy because you know that the week is over and you have to return to the default world.
Whether you like the man or not, you still gotta show some respect for him, cause without him, you're fuckin' lost, literally.
reprobate said:
No. I'm not a burner, and frankly, the idea of spending a week in the high desert with a tens of thousands of really high people fully offsets the amusement value for me. Ain't going.
That said, the core idea is not a hard concept to grasp. It's called make your own fun and be amused by others that do likewise. It's not about chaos or freedom from responsibility. It's about freedom from stricture. There are rules, there are customs and there are manners. Destroying something that others worked to create isn't impromptu, or free form, or creative or provocative. It is the expression of a juvenile, drug addled moron, who I'm sure is very much less cheerful now.
But isn't the man going to be destroyed anyway? Isn't the difference in this case, when it was destroyed? And by whom? Is there a usual group (I'm assuming the people that created the structure) that are the ones designated to burn it? If that is the case, I don't understand why the Burning Man is the center attraction -- to me, that seems counterintuitive, like it undermines the individuality and importance of the different installations/exhibits around the rest of the playa, made by other people -- to give one a hierarchical superiority over the others.
The burn is the central unifying event of the festival. It is no more or less important than anything else, it just gives cohesion to the event and the community. Thats why its called burning man. And yes, there is a large group of people who work very hard to make it happen, and safely. So yeah, the difference is when it was burned and by whom and also how, but those are very significant differences. It was burned as a petulant anarchic fuck you, by a guy with no right to do it in a flagrantly dangerous manner.
Well Black Rock City is a community, it's not just random chaos. Most of the stuff out there is the result of months of planning. The man represents the unity of the community, he watches over us, he guides us (he's in the exact center of the city, so he is a very important navigational tool), he unites us.
When the man burns, that's when the place turns in to complete chaos. While everyone's watching the man burn, and it is quite spectacular and for some, emotional, there are people running through the city, stealing all of the road signs.
The last two days are very disorienting and confusing, and quite melancholy because you know that the week is over and you have to return to the default world.
Whether you like the man or not, you still gotta show some respect for him, cause without him, you're fuckin' lost, literally.
My friend just got back from bm. She's been going for years. She's pretty into it, she's the head of something called a conclave, etc, etc.
I asked her what she thought of the man being burnt early, and she said:
The man doesn't burn early. It may burn when you don't expect it, and it may not burn how you expect it. But the burn itself is always exactly the way its supposed to be.
sitar said:
My friend just got back from bm. She's been going for years. She's pretty into it, she's the head of something called a conclave, etc, etc.
I asked her what she thought of the man being burnt early, and she said:
The man doesn't burn early. It may burn when you don't expect it, and it may not burn how you expect it. But the burn itself is always exactly the way its supposed to be.
sitar said:
My friend just got back from bm. She's been going for years. She's pretty into it, she's the head of something called a conclave, etc, etc.
I asked her what she thought of the man being burnt early, and she said:
The man doesn't burn early. It may burn when you don't expect it, and it may not burn how you expect it. But the burn itself is always exactly the way its supposed to be.
sitar said:
My friend just got back from bm. She's been going for years. She's pretty into it, she's the head of something called a conclave, etc, etc.
I asked her what she thought of the man being burnt early, and she said:
The man doesn't burn early. It may burn when you don't expect it, and it may not burn how you expect it. But the burn itself is always exactly the way its supposed to be.
sitar said:
My friend just got back from bm. She's been going for years. She's pretty into it, she's the head of something called a conclave, etc, etc.
I asked her what she thought of the man being burnt early, and she said:
The man doesn't burn early. It may burn when you don't expect it, and it may not burn how you expect it. But the burn itself is always exactly the way its supposed to be.
sitar said:
My friend just got back from bm. She's been going for years. She's pretty into it, she's the head of something called a conclave, etc, etc.
I asked her what she thought of the man being burnt early, and she said:
The man doesn't burn early. It may burn when you don't expect it, and it may not burn how you expect it. But the burn itself is always exactly the way its supposed to be.
TheFuckOffKid
NEWSWIRE
Australia
AUG 30, 2007 03:02 PM