Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96

 ... 487

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

Tiger_Fodder

Tiger_Fodder

Braintree, MA
June 2007

AUG 13, 2007 07:43 PM

oyaji said:

heartattack59 said:
There was a LOGO debate last week and can anybody tell me how many Republicans showed up?

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

Big... Fat... Goose Egg.



That sucks and all, but how is that relevant to this particular thread?



Since when do posts need to be relevant to a thread? You must be thinking of the WSJ Blog.

heartattack59

heartattack59

Cleveland, OH
July 2007

AUG 13, 2007 08:33 PM

I believe the title is "Republicans are sad little turds" and somebody commented earlier on how "intolerant" Democrats were in relation to the oh so tolerant Republican party... they are so deep in the polls because they are so out of touch with the American people... that's the point.

skeptik

skeptik

New Orleans, LA
February 2004

AUG 13, 2007 08:39 PM

heartattack59 said:
I believe the title is "Republicans are sad little turds" and somebody commented earlier on how "intolerant" Democrats were in relation to the oh so tolerant Republican party... they are so deep in the polls because they are so out of touch with the American people... that's the point.



Well yeah, but that same person would likely state that "kowtowing to the gays" - y'know, caring about what they think - makes the Democrats out of touch with the American people.

Cremon

Cremon

Marietta, GA
April 2003

AUG 13, 2007 10:28 PM

ericwine said:

Zarth said:

ericwine said:I've had a similar line of thinking myself. Then again, the Democrats don't have a good track record for nominating non-shitbags, either, which accounts for GWB being a two term president. *sigh*


Fixed.

Other than Clinton, the Democrats haven't advanced a genuinely electable candidate since . . . FDR, really. Unless you count Kennedy, which is debatable.



That's a good assessment, including Kennedy, considering the controversy surrounding his election and his poor standing in the polls in the weeks before his assassination.
It doesn't appear they're going to be any different this time, either. If they win, it'll be like Carter, who won because the GOP fucked up.
It would be nice if either side could advance someone worth two shits, but all I can see is the flaws, maybe because the incumbent and his predecessor were so disappointing.



Whether you are a Democrat or a Republican - at this moment, the choices aren't very good. This race is wide open. I don't think anyone can call this one. But I do think Hillary will get the Democratic nomination and either Obama or Edwards will be picked as her running mate. (My WAG).

On the Republican side - Most of the candidates that even remotely have a shot haven't entered the race (yet).

Cremon

Cremon

Marietta, GA
April 2003

AUG 13, 2007 10:35 PM

graphicsman77 said:
This article shows just how little understanding you have of the Iowa Straw Poll, or the Republicans in general. I'm amazed at how a community that prides itself on tolerance and acceptance, can be so jaded and intolerant of others political views....quite to the point of ridicule. That is unacceptible, and I think you need to consider an apology to those of us who happen to be Republicans. Our money spends just as easily as anyone else's. I don't think that we paid our membership dues to come here and have our views disparaged daily by individuals who have the faintest notion of what they speak.

Frankly, I think you'd be better served monitoring your own side of the aisle, and covering the lightweights in the Democratic race. mad



Like you, I am a Republican. And while I do not agree with EVERYTHING FearTheReaper said, with all due respect Sir, he's definitely done his research. Look at the Republican candidates who are actually running. Forget the ones that MIGHT run.

Do any of them really look all that promising?

Cremon

Cremon

Marietta, GA
April 2003

AUG 13, 2007 10:39 PM

skeptik said:

heartattack59 said:
I believe the title is "Republicans are sad little turds" and somebody commented earlier on how "intolerant" Democrats were in relation to the oh so tolerant Republican party... they are so deep in the polls because they are so out of touch with the American people... that's the point.



Well yeah, but that same person would likely state that "kowtowing to the gays" - y'know, caring about what they think - makes the Democrats out of touch with the American people.



It is truly sad to think that right now, most Americans are against the gays. It's my hope that the next generation won't be so narrow minded. But you DO have a point.

LordHAlmighty

LordHAlmighty

Citrus Heights, CA
July 2007

AUG 13, 2007 11:47 PM

... meanwhile the Dem's keep talking out of both sides of their mouth - proposing bills that would increase abstinence-only (which is widely known to NOT work) education funding to $141 million (up $28 million).

To quote James Wagoner of Advocates for Youth, "Let's face it. With friends like these, who needs conservative Republicans?"

[with props to this month's Playboy for the article]

Say what you want about Republicans, but at least they're upfront about their bigotry, sexism, homophobia, xenophobia, and desire to see the rich get richer at everyone elses expense. You *know* what you're getting with the GOP... the Dem's, however...

Luddite

Luddite

Anderson, CA
December 2005

AUG 14, 2007 12:18 AM

MessyJessy said:

graphicsman77 said:
how you can right an article



I have no idea...



By not wronging it...

....wait

ASSH0LE

ASSH0LE

Las Vegas, NV
June 2003

AUG 14, 2007 01:59 AM

clemsux said:
It shouldn't matter if Romney is Morman, the only reason why he is in third rihgt now is because no one knows who he is. He is set to win the first 2 or 3 straw polls so well see if his stance changes. And i hate to defend him but Thompson worked on the abortion lobby when he was very very young in politics.



Romney won the straw poll because it's a pay to vote event. He had the most money to give to prospective voters for him, and because he worked hard to win the thing, putting more of his money and effort in there, in hopes of doing well enough against Giuliani and McCain. They basically stuck it to him by not participating, which takes of fair bit of the luster off his win.

VinnyVidiVici

VinnyVidiVici

Orange Park, FL
February 2006

AUG 14, 2007 02:48 AM

I'm an independent and no candidate from either party gets me really excited.

I just find it hard to believe that these men and women are the best we have for the job.

Shal

Shal

Los Angeles, CA
October 2002

AUG 14, 2007 01:01 PM

Vinny_Blaze said:
I'm an independent and no candidate from either party gets me really excited.

I just find it hard to believe that these men and women are the best we have for the job.



I'm thinking that no Republican who is worth anything politically would touch this race with a 10-foot pole.

Think about the colossal military, economic, budgetary, and infrastructure mess the next president will inherit.

ongoingnightmare

ongoingnightmare

Denver, CO
April 2003

AUG 14, 2007 01:04 PM

You can thank Diebold agian, their where alot of voteing problems

scorp17yh

scorp17yh

Brookings, OR
November 2004

AUG 14, 2007 01:36 PM

Mitt Romney and his 5 'chicken hawk' sons are a disgrace to the country. While he will happily continue to send the sons and daughters of this country off to die in The Bushies absurd war if he is elected his sons have decided that

"one of the ways my sons are showing suport for our nation is helping to get me eleceted, because they think I'd be a great president." replied the cowardly piece of crap Mitt Romney

Sign Up or Shut Up

Draft College Republicans

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

AUG 14, 2007 03:29 PM

Shalome said:

Vinny_Blaze said:
I'm an independent and no candidate from either party gets me really excited.

I just find it hard to believe that these men and women are the best we have for the job.



I'm thinking that no Republican who is worth anything politically would touch this race with a 10-foot pole.

Think about the colossal military, economic, budgetary, and infrastructure mess the next president will inherit.



In which case, which candidate should the Democrats put forward? Given what they're going to inherit.

Personally I'm saying Clinton. She's already tainted in so many people's eyes; let her take the flak of sorting it all out. Then when she doesn't run in 2012 maybe the Dems can get solidly behind someone else.

</threadjack>

VinnyVidiVici

VinnyVidiVici

Orange Park, FL
February 2006

AUG 14, 2007 03:57 PM

Shalome said:

Vinny_Blaze said:
I'm an independent and no candidate from either party gets me really excited.

I just find it hard to believe that these men and women are the best we have for the job.



I'm thinking that no Republican who is worth anything politically would touch this race with a 10-foot pole.

Think about the colossal military, economic, budgetary, and infrastructure mess the next president will inherit.



That could be it. Even then though, I can't think of a Republican who is not running who would make a good President. smile

Gesomina

Gesomina

Detroit, MI
January 2006

AUG 17, 2007 12:58 PM

My vote is for Huckabee, I think he is the most likeable of the lot. But he may be to nice to fix this mess. I am also partial to Giuliani I lived in NYC when he was mayor and I thought he was awesome. I had the chance to meet him and have seen him speak a few times. I think it sucks he doesnt stand a chance because of his liberal views on abortion. Oh but the whole marrying his cousin, thats suspect!

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next