NEWS: Jerking Off Is Now A Crime, Please Kill Me

I believe the cells are monitored by camera. Her job is to check the monitors to make sure they are not doing anything wrong. I can sort of understand her plight, it's her job, she shouldn't have to watch these dudes beat the Bishop all day. But then again, she should have had some idea of what she was getting into.

Technically it is against the law, but the logistics of charging every prisoner for waxing the dolphin is insane. I would think if anything loss of privileges would be in order before criminal charges are filed.

Hmm.... actually you really seemed to be aiming towards uneducated sheep follower redneck, and I was aiming for Mr. Mackey from South Park. And I'm from the midwest with no noticeable accent and am pro-decriminalization of drug offenses... So... nope... You didn't quite hit the mark.

Well, I was sort of going for generic ignorant sodbuster, but I am happy to hear that you think it doesn't apply to you, but, to be honest, I have seen no evidence of any sort of educated opinion to date, so, you know, I don't know.

As for decriimnalization, what kind of libertarian are you? Legalization is the only right response. The state has no right to tell us what we can put in our bodies. Right? Decriminalization is just some moral limbo: "It's still wrong, but we won't spank you."

I'm the kind of libertarian that realizes that small steps are more likely to succeed than large ridiculous ones. I guess you could say that I'm the kind that will accept compromise to get closer to what I want. You know... a reasonable one. That's why I have such a huge problem with dems and reps. The Dems are really good at pointing out the problem and do little to take immediate steps but instead spend money like they're drunk at a casino researching the problem. Meanwhile the Reps run headlong at the problem with schemes that would make Wile E Coyote laugh. So you get one side doing nothing and the other doing everything wrong.

So ideally and long term, legalization. Realistically and short term, decriminalization.

And the reason I think your sod-buster (good term by the way, I like that) accent doesn't apply to me is that I think freely and just because my opinion doesn't agree with yours doesn't make mine uneducated. Just as yours not agreeing with mine doesn't make you wrong. It just makes you in opposition to me on an issue. I'm sure there are plenty of things that we agree on, or at the very least could agree to a compromise on. You just seem a little too quick to call everything that doesn't sit right with you wrong and morally reprehensible, and that's kinda sad.

I used the term uneducated advisedly. Your analysis (I am using the term loosely here) above being a case in point. There are no "Dems" and "Reps" there are lose organizations and affiliations that come together and apart as the needs seem to demand. The current "Republicans" (I am speaking in terms of leadership here as the rank and file is anything but monolithic) look nothing like T Roosevelt's (and are a far cry from Goldwater's) and the current "Dems" look nothing like FDR's or even like Kennedy's In fact they look more like T. Roosevelt Republicans.

It is all about compromise and sharing power and you know what? Any Libertarian that could actually get elected would look exactly the fucking same.

It is time for you to trade in your middle school sensibilities and figure out how you want to deal with the real world. The one you have constructed is pure fantasy. And an uneducated one at that.

I think that you would find that I do not disagree with reasoned libertarian (that is classical liberal) points of view at all. What I disagree with is your sophomoric take on them.