NEWS: How Bush Ruined Our Courts

alpha22 said:

you are a subject of the queen.what do you know about being a member of the united states armed force and serving under the commander and chief

Zarth said:
I see the Monstertruck Replacement Competition has a frontrunner. Yay.

Zarth said:
I see the Monstertruck Replacement Competition has a frontrunner. Yay.

fountainofdreams said:
Anyways. Aldous, although I'm not sure how applicable the link to Hitler you've drawn is, (I think there may be some truth to it, although it'd be circumstantial at best) but you (and I'd assume everybody else) might find this interview interesting. I've seen these kind of reports before, trying to study Bush's psychology, and I've always found their conclusions at least mildly frightening.

NickFaust said:

You know, I wonder if SG is, like, secretly paying these people. I mean it is entertaining and all.

I just wish they wouldn't be so obvious.

chainlink said:

You know I would completely believe it if I didn't run into people just like that every time I leave the house.

chainlink said:

You know I would completely believe it if I didn't run into people just like that every time I leave the house.

attn_ho said:

well, they did put uptight on the payroll. and an active current events board is a successful current events board.

ooh! maybe theyre all Suicide Girls, paid to PRETEND to be middle aged republican (/libertarian) dudes! now THATS a conspiracy theory.

alpha22 said:

Uniform Code of Military Justice) Article 134 also known as the Disloyal statements provision of the UCMJ is an article of military law in the United States that provides for penalties by court-martial for "disloyal" statements made "with the intent to promote disloyalty or disaffection toward the United States by any member of the armed forces or to interfere with or impair the loyalty to the United States or good order and discipline of any member of the armed forces."

This article appears to limit the freedom of speech guaranteed to all Americans under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution as it appears to prevent someone in the military from expressing their opinions about issues that should be discussed in public, though some state that the right of free speech is reserved to an individual member of the military while "out of uniform" and this law recognizes limitations that an individual faces when voicing opinions during military operations.

Members of the United States military are in a peculiar situation of having protections under the first amendment and swearing to follow the President's orders. Thus, although a military member may vote for whom ever he/she wishes, the member may not actively campaign against (or for) the president. Additionally, disloyal statements would erode the overall strength and resolve of the military as a whole.

DhD_PillowPants said:

Why do you hate America (and churches) so much?