Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97

 ... 484

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

7 | 8 | 9

Next

mingol

mingol

Singapore
July 2005

JUL 04, 2007 05:48 AM

Zarth said:

mingol said:

SignalNoise said:
(W)hy should this putz be allowed to just have a normal life? Why shouldn't he have to pay, just like every other schmuck who breaks the law?


Because when you're a member of the Republican political elite, the rules only apply to other people. Duh!


Well, to unpack that a little, people in general tend to empathize with others most when they can imagine themselves in the other's position. Members of the wealthy, white, Republican elite obviously don't have much in common in any lawbreakers who aren't also wealthy, white, and Republican.

They therefore tend to see crimes committed by such fellow wealthy whites as "mistakes" (which they could have done themselves - for instance, investment fraud), as opposed to the "innate criminality" of the poor and ethnic (robbing a liquor store - but why?), and so cannot perceive the hypocrisy (not to mention the rank injustice) of calling for forgiveness for the privileged and oppression for the downtrodden.



There's a lot of truth to this. Still, the same right-wing hacks who are frothing at the mouth because Bush didn't give Libby a full pardon also frothed at the mouth because Bill Clinton got a blow job, and he's wealthy and white, though not Republican.

Of course, maybe the deciding factor wasn't his politics, but the fact that he got a blow job. I can't (or perhaps don't want to) imagine most of the wealthy, white, Republican elite ever getting one.

Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

JUL 04, 2007 06:45 AM

mingol said:
Of course, maybe the deciding factor wasn't his politics, but the fact that he got a blow job. I can't (or perhaps don't want to) imagine most of the wealthy, white, Republican elite ever getting one.


I can imagine it happening. Just not without the involvement of a transfer of monies or a deportation threat.

mingol

mingol

Singapore
July 2005

JUL 04, 2007 06:53 AM

Zarth said:

mingol said:
Of course, maybe the deciding factor wasn't his politics, but the fact that he got a blow job. I can't (or perhaps don't want to) imagine most of the wealthy, white, Republican elite ever getting one.


I can imagine it happening. Just not without the involvement of a transfer of monies or a deportation threat.



The first scenario did occur to me, actually, but I must admit that the second one didn't. Good call.

Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

JUL 04, 2007 06:57 AM

mingol said:

Zarth said:

mingol said:
Of course, maybe the deciding factor wasn't his politics, but the fact that he got a blow job. I can't (or perhaps don't want to) imagine most of the wealthy, white, Republican elite ever getting one.


I can imagine it happening. Just not without the involvement of a transfer of monies or a deportation threat.


The first scenario did occur to me, actually, but I must admit that the second one didn't. Good call.


And I didn't even mention the underage boys.

mingol

mingol

Singapore
July 2005

JUL 04, 2007 07:04 AM

Zarth said:
And I didn't even mention the underage boys.



Well jeez, if we're talking about those blow jobs, then just forget what I said.

Lessnessmen

Lessnessmen

Fayetteville, NY
February 2003

JUL 04, 2007 07:54 AM

so did any one see Keith Oberman on msnbc last night, i love that man, his points were all right on target, Bush /Cheney has to go...

Charybdus

Charybdus

Lafayette, LA
July 2006

JUL 04, 2007 11:19 AM

As much as I loathe Bush, I think Libby was just a scapegoat. Jesus, the poor bastard just seems like a simpering "team player." Rove should be in fucking jail, not him!

TheRedBaron

TheRedBaron

Cambridge, MA
November 2003

JUL 04, 2007 11:49 AM

I am amazed that nobody has posted this.



When I heard about the de facto pardon I thought it was a decisive moment in the course of the nation. I saw it as the moment when the last iota of shame was cast aside by the powerful and corrupt, who no longer covered or hid their misdeeds. It was the moment I knew that nepotism and oligarchy were now flaunted by our "leaders", and not a ominous undertone as they had been in the past. The absolute indecency of the Act, the blatant disregard for the intelligence and will of the people. I thought that this was the moment which would teach the future corrupt that it was okay, and that, yes, they could get away with it.

Maybe not. People are more roused than I had accounted for. Of course, it's hard to gauge the attitudes of my countrymen from Cambridge, Massachusetts. But maybe I will be wrong, and this will become a furor. Maybe, if the media across America doesn't equivocate and hush this out of political memory, we will do something about the sad state of our nation.
I certainly hope we will. Because if not, it is going to be infinitely harder to disallow this behavior in the future.

I know I'm ready to take to the streets.

I don't know what I can do about this, but I am going to find out.

tfot

tfot

Auburn, WA
June 2007

JUL 04, 2007 12:07 PM

I feel like someone in the ranks needs to run impeachment up the flagpole and see who salutes...

Herod

Herod

Columbus, OH
November 2005

JUL 04, 2007 02:38 PM

A long thread, hope I'm not repeating something.

As I understand it, at the moment Bush can't pardon Libby because then Libby would be open to being questioned, subpoenaed, etc. The commuted sentence means that Libby is still convicted, and most importantly, that he is still in the appeal process. While in the appeal process he cannot be questioned, subpoenaed, etc. If he were pardoned he could be subpoenaed to testify against Cheney,

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

JUL 04, 2007 03:38 PM

Herod said:
A long thread, hope I'm not repeating something.

As I understand it, at the moment Bush can't pardon Libby because then Libby would be open to being questioned, subpoenaed, etc. The commuted sentence means that Libby is still convicted, and most importantly, that he is still in the appeal process. While in the appeal process he cannot be questioned, subpoenaed, etc. If he were pardoned he could be subpoenaed to testify against Cheney,



Aha...

If anyone did post that, then I missed it. Damn good point.

DhD_No_Pants

DhD_No_Pants

Katy, TX
May 2006

JUL 05, 2007 07:04 AM

bald_eagle said:

Herod said:
A long thread, hope I'm not repeating something.

As I understand it, at the moment Bush can't pardon Libby because then Libby would be open to being questioned, subpoenaed, etc. The commuted sentence means that Libby is still convicted, and most importantly, that he is still in the appeal process. While in the appeal process he cannot be questioned, subpoenaed, etc. If he were pardoned he could be subpoenaed to testify against Cheney,



That could be the case; I'm not sure. I would love to see some verification of this. If so, it goes a long way toward explaining commuting instead of pardoning.



Bush hasn't ruled out pardoning Libby.



On Tuesday Mr Bush declined to rule out a complete pardon for Libby at a later time.

"As to the future I rule nothing in and nothing out," he told journalists in Washington. But he also reiterated that he thought Libby's non-prison punishments should stand.

DrOrpheus

DrOrpheus

Salt Lake City, UT
February 2007

JUL 05, 2007 12:57 PM

too bad the democratic controlled congress are a bunch of pussies and won't do a thing that really matters to punish this administration

Heathen_Dave

Heathen_Dave

Birmingham, AL
July 2005

JUL 05, 2007 02:12 PM

Why is everyone reacting so profoundly? Presidents have used pardons poorly for a long time and you're surprised and hurt that this administration out of all of them did it?

Please, he'll be gone in a year and a half and then you can all have someone else just as corrupt and evil to disappoint you.

whatever

MessyJessy

MessyJessy

Fort Myers, FL
August 2005

JUL 05, 2007 02:50 PM

Heathen_Dave said:

Please, he'll be gone in a year and a half and then you can all have someone else just as corrupt and evil to disappoint you.

whatever



Only if Satan is in the running...or maybe Nixon.

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

JUL 05, 2007 02:58 PM

DhD_PillowPants said:

bald_eagle said:

Herod said:
A long thread, hope I'm not repeating something.

As I understand it, at the moment Bush can't pardon Libby because then Libby would be open to being questioned, subpoenaed, etc. The commuted sentence means that Libby is still convicted, and most importantly, that he is still in the appeal process. While in the appeal process he cannot be questioned, subpoenaed, etc. If he were pardoned he could be subpoenaed to testify against Cheney,



That could be the case; I'm not sure. I would love to see some verification of this. If so, it goes a long way toward explaining commuting instead of pardoning.



Bush hasn't ruled out pardoning Libby.



On Tuesday Mr Bush declined to rule out a complete pardon for Libby at a later time.

"As to the future I rule nothing in and nothing out," he told journalists in Washington. But he also reiterated that he thought Libby's non-prison punishments should stand.



The key here is "at a later time", isn't it? "As late as possible" looks likely, if Herod is correct.

Chainlink

Chainlink

Key West, FL
August 2005

JUL 05, 2007 05:36 PM

bald_eagle said:
Side note on the Bush administration firing back at the Clintons. I saw this on Comcast News:

Scott Stanzel, a White House deputy press secretary, said that, "When you think about the previous administration and the 11th-hour, fire-sale pardons ... it's really startling that they have the gall to criticize what we believe is a very considered, a very deliberate approach to a very unique case."



This is one of my pet peeves with some of the people who communicate for a living. They fracture the English language. Something is unique, or it isn't. There's no such thing as very unique.



Can something be sort-a unique ? confused

trebor

trebor

I'm lost
OLD SKOOL

JUL 05, 2007 07:19 PM

aldoushuxley said:
We have had minimal U.S. casualties, less then 1000 per year to be exact.



I certainly see what you are saying about this not being a lot of deaths compared historically with some of the wars the United States has been involved with in the past. I just wouldn't be so quick to dismiss the over 3500 deaths there have been so far, and I would imagine it would be more difficult to dismiss if one of those people were a family member, friend, or fellow soldier. This also does not take into account the thousands of Iraqis who have been killed in the conflict, exactly how many we are unlikely to ever know.

When I was talking about accountability I was referring both to the voters and to Libby himself. President Bush would not have been in a position to commute Libby's prison sentence had he not been voted back into office. One of the only ways we have of holding our politicians resposible is through the ballot box. I would like to see the voters hold the politicians from both parties responsible for the war and vote them out of office.

As for Libby himself, I certainly wouldn't hold him responsible for all of the deaths that have resulted from the war since it is such a complicated situation with many parties who could be considered culpable. It can be debated whether President Bush is correct in thinking that the prison sentence for Libby was too extreme. However, I think any consideration of the crime Libby was convicted for needs to take into account the thousands of deaths that resulted in part from the policy his crime was intended to support.

Heathen_Dave

Heathen_Dave

Birmingham, AL
July 2005

JUL 05, 2007 10:35 PM

MessyJessy said:

Heathen_Dave said:

Please, he'll be gone in a year and a half and then you can all have someone else just as corrupt and evil to disappoint you.

whatever



Only if Satan is in the running...or maybe Nixon.



Maybe not Nixon. But Robot Nixon? Oh yeah.

TheRedBaron

TheRedBaron

Cambridge, MA
November 2003

JUL 06, 2007 12:37 AM

trebor said:

aldoushuxley said:
We have had minimal U.S. casualties, less then 1000 per year to be exact.


As for Libby himself, I certainly wouldn't hold him responsible for all of the deaths that have resulted from the war since it is such a complicated situation with many parties who could be considered culpable. It can be debated whether President Bush is correct in thinking that the prison sentence for Libby was too extreme. However, I think any consideration of the crime Libby was convicted for needs to take into account the thousands of deaths that resulted in part from the policy his crime was intended to support.


Just to clarify the issue, because it can get cloudy:

This isn't about deaths in Iraq. Not centrally, anyway. This is about the intimidation of those who speak out against the Administration, and forcing silence on would be dissenters. In this case it was leaking the name of Valerie Wilson as a PUNISHMENT for her husband's critique of American foreign shananagans. Her name was deliberately leaked to send a message to would be whistle blowers. The party threw a man on the pyre to pay for this gross misdeed (whether he's the man who did it, we may never know). He was convicted.

He has now been let off with zero jail time. So, SOMEONE in the party committed this crime. Libby was sent to pay the piper. And now he has been set free by the head of the group who the crime benefited. This is the administration coordinating crimes against the nation and then absolving those who The People bring to justice for these crimes.

It is clear as fucking crystal and absolutely unforgivable.

Westley

Westley

Vatican City
April 2004

JUL 06, 2007 12:57 AM

^^^ Well said.

RudieCantFail

RudieCantFail

Baton Rouge, LA
January 2006

JUL 06, 2007 01:02 AM

Heathen_Dave said:
Maybe not Nixon. But Robot Nixon? Oh yeah.



<33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333

KatieOkieDokie

KatieOkieDokie

Conover, OH
February 2007

JUL 08, 2007 08:32 AM

Did you expect anything less from him??

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

7 | 8 | 9

Next