TOPICS:
JUN 27, 2007 04:26 PM
How can I be in a militia if I've never done shot a gun (BB guns not included)?

montestruc
Houston, TX
June 2004
JUN 27, 2007 04:34 PM
reprobate said:
freshprncebelair said:
reprobate said:
Tech29 said:
Do you know how easy it is to make your own ammunition? Seperate ammunition storage isnt the answer.
Reloading is not "making". You go right ahead and try and make a high pressure cartridge casing from scratch, just find someplace really deserted the first time you pull the trigger.
That is a surmountable obstacle, but the fixes required for the tight tolerances of todays auto-feeding guns would require a fundamental change in the way guns are made (like caseless cartridges).
Of course, there are always black powder, but that's fairly irrelevant due to limited range, low reload speed, and a lack of pretty much anything that makes a modern gun a modern gun.
Do you have any experience whatsoever in material science, metallurgy, machining, extruding or casting or do you just enjoy talking out of your ass?
I do. I am a working mechanical engineer with license in your state. While making ammunition is harder than making a modern firearm, it is not that much harder.
It is not done by little mom & pop shops (as some firearms are made) because they cannot in this economy make ammo anything remotely as cheaply as a big firm that can afford large scale fully automated machinery can. This is like the firm I work for making bolts. Could we do it, sure, we cannot however do it and compete where huge firms make it will fully automated equipment in ton lot quantities. We specialize in equipment we know how to make cheaper or better than others.
However, change the laws such that making, having or selling ammo is illegal, and the price of black market ammo will go through the roof and it then will be economical to make ammo in your garage and sell it at like $10 per round, while now for large caliber pistol ammo you pay $0.25 per round.
Oh, by the way, the issue is not the cartridge holding pressure, they don't, they deform to the confines of the gun barrel and breach block. The gun barrel and breach block hold the pressure, the issue is the cartridge deforms and tears such that you cannot extract it after firing.
In other words the person who wrote about "make a high pressure cartridge casing from scratch" is the one talking out his behind. No casings hold pressure, the barrel and breach block do. The casing only acts as a seal on firing and a holder for the ammo to allow rapid loading.
The issue is to make the casing such that it is so close on the outside to the inside geometry of the barrel that it does not tear or deform too much and jam the gun after one shot.
JUN 27, 2007 04:34 PM
montestruc said:
SockPuppet said:
montestruc said:
Expect gun violence to go up in Switzerland as it has in the UK after each time gun laws were made more strict.
/QUOTE]
Source, please. With graphs.
So you can attack it as pro gun or so you can say well what about other nations?
No thanks.
Every single western industrial nation that has enacted strict gun control has had a subsiquent rise in violent crime and murder rates.
Some anti-gun people will say (usually correctly) that "gun crime" or "gun deaths" have dropped, or that "mass shootings" have gone down or stopped. So what? Death by gun is not worse than death by knife or blunt instrument. As it happens the rate of murders rises after the population is disarmed.
It would be much less work for all parties concerned, and much more appropriate as you wish to have us give up our rights, if you provide an example of a western industrial nation and the violent crime rate in say the 10 years before and after such a law was enacted, show us where such legislation can be clearly be shown to have been a net benifit to the public where actual murder rates went down and actual violent crime rates went down.
No. You proposed that something has occurred. Produce some evidence for your proposition.

DevilsReject
Cleveland, OH
February 2007
JUN 27, 2007 04:34 PM
emotedcreations said:
How can I be in a militia if I've never done shot a gun (BB guns not included)?
When you need to defend your life, it's not that hard to learn
JUN 27, 2007 04:36 PM
I've shot a gun. I'm fucking English.

montestruc
Houston, TX
June 2004
JUN 27, 2007 04:50 PM
emotedcreations said:
How can I be in a militia if I've never done shot a gun (BB guns not included)?
You are.
If the US were invaded and your state governor declares martial law he can send an officer of the militia (National Guard) to go and get some men to help fight.
As in a trained corporal (he is a non-commissioned officer) in your state National Guard can be given an order to goto your neighborhood and round up a squad of men, god help you if you refuse in time of war and emergency, the crimes of treason or desertion under fire might apply, both of which can get you a firing squad.
He can also round up weapons in private hands for use in defending the state, so if you do not have anything, the next stop for our hypothetical corporal is your local gun store to get any of the men who do not have their own weapons a gun. Then off to fight you go.
The Russians did stuff like that in WWII to fight the Germans (attack regular German infantry with raw militia who only had a gun for every other man, Stalingrad for example) , as did the USA in the war of 1812.
Stalingrad is also an excellent example of how effective militia can be against a modern well trained well equipped army. The workers of the Tractor Works ( a huge factory) in northern Stalingrad formed a scratch militia unit and counter attacked a German tank division and forced it to retreat several hundred yards and held the line till relieved by regular troops a few days later.

montestruc
Houston, TX
June 2004
JUN 27, 2007 04:51 PM
SockPuppet said:
montestruc said:
SockPuppet said:
montestruc said:
Expect gun violence to go up in Switzerland as it has in the UK after each time gun laws were made more strict.
/QUOTE]
Source, please. With graphs.
So you can attack it as pro gun or so you can say well what about other nations?
No thanks.
Every single western industrial nation that has enacted strict gun control has had a subsiquent rise in violent crime and murder rates.
Some anti-gun people will say (usually correctly) that "gun crime" or "gun deaths" have dropped, or that "mass shootings" have gone down or stopped. So what? Death by gun is not worse than death by knife or blunt instrument. As it happens the rate of murders rises after the population is disarmed.
It would be much less work for all parties concerned, and much more appropriate as you wish to have us give up our rights, if you provide an example of a western industrial nation and the violent crime rate in say the 10 years before and after such a law was enacted, show us where such legislation can be clearly be shown to have been a net benifit to the public where actual murder rates went down and actual violent crime rates went down.
No. You proposed that something has occurred. Produce some evidence for your proposition.
No you are proposing that I should give up my liberty prove your idea has any merit at all.

montestruc
Houston, TX
June 2004
JUN 27, 2007 05:05 PM
SockPuppet said:
scylis said:
one little flaw in your sarcasm-gasm: the law only affects the storage of the ammunition for and the potential future household storage of military-grade, army-issued automatic rifles. nothing about any other type of personal firearms, from shotguns to handguns to regular rifles, be they of the semi-auto, bolt-action, or single shot variety. and that they can seize anything that could be used as a blunt instrument of pain.
Let me guess: Swiss ownership of non-military guns is pretty small. Am I right?
No
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-switzerland.htm
Percent of households with a handgun, 1991 (1)
United States 29%
Switzerland 14
Finland 7
Germany 7
Belgium 6
France 6
Canada 5
Norway 4
Europe 4
Australia 2
Netherlands 2
United Kingdom 1
This is by an anti-gun site by the way that goes into the whole BS of "gun murder" like it is better to be murdered with a knife.

montestruc
Houston, TX
June 2004
JUN 27, 2007 05:16 PM
Uncognitive said:
-----------snip
Secondly, the sale, manufacture, ownership and operation of automobiles and other vehicles is highly regulated, arguably even more so than the sale, manufacture and operation of guns. Why is okay for federal and state governments to mandate licenses and registration for cars and car owners but not guns and gun owners?
Cars and trucks that use PUBLIC ROADS and so are STREET LEGAL are indeed so regulated on the basis of use of such roads. Those roads being public (government) property the legal basis of this regulation is the right of the owner of that property to regulate how it is used.
I have not been given a ticket for a (minor) at fault accident years ago as it was on private property and so the police had no traffic jurisdiction.
The sale manufacture, ownership and operation of offroad motor vehicles is almost unregulated. I drove my Uncle's tractor on his farm when I was about 11 and needed no license or learner's permit. Farm kids commonly learn to drive cars on private land long before they can get a learner's permit to drive on the road.
One can even build, and some people do, very, very fast cars that are not even slightly street legal that do not have to meet any such government regulations. Though if you want to race them you need to meet the regulations of the race track you race them at.

JUN 27, 2007 05:32 PM
SourPatchKid said:
emotedcreations said:
How can I be in a militia if I've never done shot a gun (BB guns not included)?
When you need to defend your life, it's not that hard to learn
I wasn't really being serious. I was speaking more in practical terms like I don't drill, I don't go to a shooting range, I don't own a gun, or even fatigues. I do study hand to hand, staff, and sword fighting, so if anyone invents a time machine I'll be all set.
I get the abstract: if the Chinese invade I'll be picking up a gun a sniping their officers. ![]()
That goes for you too montestruc. ![]()
He can also round up weapons in private hands for use in defending the state, so if you do not have anything, the next stop for our hypothetical corporal is your local gun store to get any of the men who do not have their own weapons a gun. Then off to fight you go.
Well, I have a live shinken and wakizashi would that help?
JUN 27, 2007 05:42 PM
montestruc said:
SockPuppet said:
Let me guess: Swiss ownership of non-military guns is pretty small. Am I right?
No
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-switzerland.htm
Percent of households with a handgun, 1991 (1)
United States 29%
Switzerland 14
Finland 7
Germany 7
Belgium 6
France 6
Canada 5
Norway 4
Europe 4
Australia 2
Netherlands 2
United Kingdom 1
This is by an anti-gun site by the way that goes into the whole BS of "gun murder" like it is better to be murdered with a knife.
I believe he was differentiating between military and non-military gun ownership. Your source just cites ownership. It doesn't say if they are military issued or not.
montestruc said:
I have not been given a ticket for a (minor) at fault accident years ago as it was on private property and so the police had no traffic jurisdiction.
I'm not commenting on your larger point, but this is in fact true. In most states, police won't respond to accidents occurring in parking lots, because they are private property.

montestruc
Houston, TX
June 2004
JUN 27, 2007 05:55 PM
emotedcreations said:
montestruc said:
SockPuppet said:
Let me guess: Swiss ownership of non-military guns is pretty small. Am I right?
No
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-switzerland.htm
Percent of households with a handgun, 1991 (1)
United States 29%
Switzerland 14
Finland 7
Germany 7
Belgium 6
France 6
Canada 5
Norway 4
Europe 4
Australia 2
Netherlands 2
United Kingdom 1
This is by an anti-gun site by the way that goes into the whole BS of "gun murder" like it is better to be murdered with a knife.
I believe he was differentiating between military and non-military gun ownership. Your source just cites ownership. It doesn't say if they are military issued or not.
Handguns are only issued to officers, and in some nations senior NCOs. I do not think that officers in the Swiss military can make up that large a fraction of the population such that 14% of the population has an active service army or airforce officer in the household (the swiss do not have a navy).
Most of them are privates, and privates are not issued handguns, only a rifle.
emotedcreations said:
montestruc said:
I have not been given a ticket for a (minor) at fault accident years ago as it was on private property and so the police had no traffic jurisdiction.
I'm not commenting on your larger point, but this is in fact true. In most states, police won't respond to accidents occurring in parking lots, because they are private property.
JUN 27, 2007 05:55 PM
montestruc said:
Every single western industrial nation that has enacted strict gun control has had a subsiquent rise in violent crime and murder rates.
Please find me the source of statistics you used to make this claim regarding Australia.
Kthnxbai.
JUN 27, 2007 06:11 PM
yeah, don't generalise all western countries.
i think after reading all of these comments. the outstanding reason i can see for america's gun violence is all these people saying 'I obey the law, I'm not crazy, I deserve to have a gun'.
why do u need one?
is it just cause someone is trying to remove your right to own one?
is it for protection? if so, don't you think that logic is a little circular?

montestruc
Houston, TX
June 2004
JUN 27, 2007 06:12 PM
emotedcreations said:
SourPatchKid said:
emotedcreations said:
How can I be in a militia if I've never done shot a gun (BB guns not included)?
When you need to defend your life, it's not that hard to learn
I wasn't really being serious. I was speaking more in practical terms like I don't drill, I don't go to a shooting range, I don't own a gun, or even fatigues. I do study hand to hand, staff, and sword fighting, so if anyone invents a time machine I'll be all set.
I get the abstract: if the Chinese invade I'll be picking up a gun a sniping their officers. ![]()
That goes for you too montestruc. ![]()
He can also round up weapons in private hands for use in defending the state, so if you do not have anything, the next stop for our hypothetical corporal is your local gun store to get any of the men who do not have their own weapons a gun. Then off to fight you go.
Well, I have a live shinken and wakizashi would that help?
Maybe if you can use them to good effect.
An ability to be able to attack in near silence can be very useful in what is otherwise a gun fight. You have to get close enough to use them though and that is liable to get you killed faster.
Shinken are not very effective in my experiance (having thrown them for a while as a teen.) If it cannot reliably stick in a cardbord box, it is not going to kill someone, just piss them off. Then he shoots you.
I will give you that if you know what you are doing with it, a sword is as dangerous as any gun within it's reach, and you can even parry the other guy's gun and disarm him (literally), if it is within reach.
But you must get in reach first, which can get you killed. Note that historically honest to god swordsmen who were trained as swordsmen from early childhood lost to muzzle loading blackpowder flintlock guns so much of the time that they became almost extinct.
You are not going to do better against semi or fully automatic modern firearms.
I was a member of the LSU fencing club while in grad school, I love electric epee (equivelent to a rapier), hate foil, and human judged saber, and could not afford electric saber equipment at that time. I have fenced kendo a couple of times with some epee enthusiast friends. I also met a kendo master who demonstrated some stuff for us (he also had an interest in western fencing). So I have some grasp of the concepts.

montestruc
Houston, TX
June 2004
JUN 27, 2007 06:13 PM
TheFuckOffKid said:
montestruc said:
Every single western industrial nation that has enacted strict gun control has had a subsiquent rise in violent crime and murder rates.
Please find me the source of statistics you used to make this claim regarding Australia.
Kthnxbai.
Prove me wrong.
JUN 27, 2007 06:16 PM
montestruc said:
emotedcreations said:
I believe he was differentiating between military and non-military gun ownership. Your source just cites ownership. It doesn't say if they are military issued or not.
Handguns are only issued to officers, and in some nations senior NCOs. I do not think that officers in the Swiss military can make up that large a fraction of the population such that 14% of the population has an active service army or airforce officer in the household (the swiss do not have a navy).
Most of them are privates, and privates are not issued handguns, only a rifle.
You're right. Your source specifies handguns. I overlooked that. Approximately 10% of the Swiss population is in the military according to the US State department, which means if 2% (that's just a guess are officers) the other 12% must then be relegated to private citizens. I haven't been paying attention to the broader strokes of this argument, so I'm not sure what the implication is, but thems the facts.
BUT: according to your own citation Switzerland is an example of strict gun control in comparison to the US and their murder rate by gun is approximately one fourth of the US, so, it looks like it might be working. No?
JUN 27, 2007 06:22 PM
montestruc said:
TheFuckOffKid said:
montestruc said:
Every single western industrial nation that has enacted strict gun control has had a subsiquent rise in violent crime and murder rates.
Please find me the source of statistics you used to make this claim regarding Australia.
Kthnxbai.
Prove me wrong.
YOU MADE THE FUCKING CLAIM!
Back it up.
I've entered these discussions dozens of times before on this very site and I've proved people wrong when they've pulled statistics out of their ass. But at least they pulled something out of somewhere.
However, I'm fucked if someone's going to march like an arrogant fuckwad into the middle of Current Events and claim "The moon is made of green cheese! Prove me wrong!" and assume that reversing the burden of proof is somehow fucking acceptable.
YOU MADE THE FUCKING CLAIM! YOU BACK IT THE FUCK UP.
Kthnxbai.
JUN 27, 2007 07:13 PM
Oh, fine then. We'll do it your way.
*waves wand*
You are hereby declared Proved Wrong!
We can disregard what you say on this or any other subject. You have been comprehensively refuted.
JUN 27, 2007 07:21 PM
Florida to expand law on gun use
The law is heavily backed by the National Rifle Association
A law letting people in Florida kill in self-defence on the street without first trying to flee an attacker has been passed by Florida politicians.
Florida law already allows people to shoot a potential attacker in their home, place of work or car.
But until now, courts insisted that anyone confronted in a public place should first try to run away.
Critics of the law say it will bring a Wild West attitude to Florida - magnet to hundreds of thousands of tourists.
One critic said all the measure would do is sell more guns and turn the state into a modern version of the OK Corral.
The bill has been heavily backed by the National Rifle Association, the lobbying group which defends the rights of Americans to carry guns.
Dennis Baxley, the Republican sponsor of the Stand Your Ground bill said it was about meeting force with force.
"If I'm attacked, I should not have to retreat," he said.
Murders and other violent crimes rose at a "disconcerting" rate in Florida last year, Gov. Charlie Crist said Tuesday, but he hopes new laws he supported will help.
The overall crime rate in Florida continued to decline, and was at its lowest rate last year since 1971. But detracting from the continuing drop was a striking spike in the number of crimes committed using guns, and in particular the number of gun killings, which rose 42 percent, according to figures released Tuesday by the Florida
Officials were quick to point at the long view - even with the startling increase in gun crime, it was still lower than what it was in 1998. And when factoring in population changes, the crime rate using guns has dropped nearly 20 percent since then.
Still, the sharp increase is cause for at least some alarm, the governor acknowledged.
"I understand ... there are some numbers that are disconcerting, particularly as it relates to murder and other violent crimes," Crist said. "Overall I understand it's a 36-year low. So there is goodness in it too."
There were 1,129 slayings statewide in 2006, up 28 percent from 2005, the data showed.
Your NRA at work.
JUN 27, 2007 07:32 PM
montestruc said:
Do you have any experience whatsoever in material science, metallurgy, machining, extruding or casting or do you just enjoy talking out of your ass?
I do. I am a working mechanical engineer with license in your state. While making ammunition is harder than making a modern firearm, it is not that much harder.
It is not done by little mom & pop shops (as some firearms are made) because they cannot in this economy make ammo anything remotely as cheaply as a big firm that can afford large scale fully automated machinery can. This is like the firm I work for making bolts. Could we do it, sure, we cannot however do it and compete where huge firms make it will fully automated equipment in ton lot quantities. We specialize in equipment we know how to make cheaper or better than others.
Because of course, I actually said somewhere that a professional machine shop properly equipped with highly specialized equipment and staffed with licensed, certified engineers in the firearms business couldn't painstakingly churn out cartridge casings. Oh, wait. No, I didn't. I bet you can churn out suppressors and full auto sears, too. Pretty good market for those too, is that your new business plan?
Oh, by the way, the issue is not the cartridge holding pressure, they don't, they deform to the confines of the gun barrel and breach block. The gun barrel and breach block hold the pressure, the issue is the cartridge deforms and tears such that you cannot extract it after firing.
Or it blows the bolt and/or slide back into your face and turns everything behind the chamber into shrapnel, because like it or not, the chamber and the bolt face ultimately contain and direct the pressure when in-battery, the cartridge itself must contain and expand evenly because it if fails to do so, the gun basically explodes.
In other words the person who wrote about "make a high pressure cartridge casing from scratch" is the one talking out his behind. No casings hold pressure, the barrel and breach block do.
Firstly, I never said anything like what you're rebutting, Nowhere was that even the vaguest reference to the mechanics of the process whatsoever. Secondly for a firearms engineer, you seem really fucking unclear what actually happens when that primer goes off. Perhaps you were confused by the "high pressure cartridge casing", but sorry, thats what it's fucking called. High pressure ammunition is a NATO standard: 28,000 PSI, which virtually any modern rifle exceeds and most military rifles and carbines nearly double. That's what you would have to make.
The casing only acts as a seal on firing and a holder for the ammo to allow rapid loading.
The issue is to make the casing such that it is so close on the outside to the inside geometry of the barrel that it does not tear or deform too much and jam the gun after one shot.
Really? Thats the issue? See if I were shooting, the issue I'd be most concerned with is that this:

or this

or this

didn't happen with my face three inches from the firing chamber.
Jammed gun my ass.
JUN 27, 2007 07:34 PM
Yeah, I know, I linked the wrong pic, but this thread got more retarded than that picture a long time ago, so it stays.
JUN 27, 2007 07:49 PM
montestruc said:
emotedcreations said:
How can I be in a militia if I've never done shot a gun (BB guns not included)?
You are.
If the US were invaded and your state governor declares martial law he can send an officer of the militia (National Guard) to go and get some men to help fight.
As in a trained corporal (he is a non-commissioned officer) in your state National Guard can be given an order to goto your neighborhood and round up a squad of men, god help you if you refuse in time of war and emergency, the crimes of treason or desertion under fire might apply, both of which can get you a firing squad.
He can also round up weapons in private hands for use in defending the state, so if you do not have anything, the next stop for our hypothetical corporal is your local gun store to get any of the men who do not have their own weapons a gun. Then off to fight you go.
The Russians did stuff like that in WWII to fight the Germans (attack regular German infantry with raw militia who only had a gun for every other man, Stalingrad for example) , as did the USA in the war of 1812.
Stalingrad is also an excellent example of how effective militia can be against a modern well trained well equipped army. The workers of the Tractor Works ( a huge factory) in northern Stalingrad formed a scratch militia unit and counter attacked a German tank division and forced it to retreat several hundred yards and held the line till relieved by regular troops a few days later.
What the fuck are you talking about? Your scenario would be governed by the constitutions and laws of fifty individual states, many of which, I'm sorry to say, proscribe martial law. No state, and indeed no condition of martial law possible in the US admits of forcible battlefield conscription by a non commissioned officer. Martial law in the US is the suspension of the enforceability of rights; the right of redress to the courts, not the abrogation of civil rights themselves, and there is a major open question as to whether even that is legally possible, given that the framers didn't delegate the authority particularly.
JUN 27, 2007 08:00 PM
reprobate said:
What the fuck are you talking about? Your scenario would be governed by the constitutions and laws of fifty individual states, many of which, I'm sorry to say, proscribe martial law. No state, and indeed no condition of martial law possible in the US admits of forcible battlefield conscription by a non commissioned officer. Martial law in the US is the suspension of the enforceability of rights; the right of redress to the courts, not the abrogation of civil rights themselves, and there is a major open question as to whether even that is legally possible, given that the framers didn't delegate the authority particularly.
Sweet, so I can keep on pretending to fight imaginary enemies with my shinken and wakizashi without having to fear using them in actual combat. Besides, I'm the last person you'd want in a militia. I really hate fighting.







Heathen_Dave
Birmingham, AL
July 2005
JUN 27, 2007 04:18 PM