* Why did Bush and Cheney abide by the executive order in question in 2001 and 2002, and then stop in 2003? Is it a coincidence they started ignoring the E.O. on handling classified materials just as they started mishandling classified materials?
* Why did Cheney abide by the E.O. in 2001 and 2002 if he's not part of the executive branch?
* Why did the President exempt the Vice President from an executive order he was already following? Why did he later exempt himself?
* When, precisely, did the White House decide that Bush and Cheney should exempt themselves from their own rules?
* Does Bush consider Cheney part of the executive branch? Why has the White House thus far refused to respond to this question? Does the President consider this a trick question?
* In its response to questions about the E.O., why did the White House point to a provision of the E.O. that doesn't exist?
* The White House insists, "There's no question that [Cheney] is in compliance" with the E.O. If there is no oversight, and Cheney is unaccountable, how does the White House know?
* In yesterday's press briefing, the president's spokesperson dismissed the oversight provision of the E.O. as "small" six times. Does the White House believe only "big" provisions need to be followed? How does the administration make the distinction?
In yesterday's painfully-amusing White House press briefing, spokesperson Dana Perino argued, without explanation, that the president exempted Dick Cheney from an Executive Order on preserving classified materials. In fact, she got rather specific about it, telling reporters that on page 18 of the E.O., "There's a distinction regarding the Vice President versus what is an agency." Perino added that this is "clear."
MSNBC's Keith Olbermann's staff looked at page 18. Take a wild guess what they found.
"No exemption at all for the Vice President on page 18. So we emailed the White House, which referred us to section 1.3 -- which is about something else altogether -- and 5.2 -- which makes no mention of the Vice President. In fact, there is no exemption for the President or the Vice President when it comes to reporting on classified material.
Faiz added that the language of the E.O. is rather sweeping: "Sec. 6.1(b) of Bush's 2003 executive order governing classified material explicitly states that it applies to any 'Executive agency...any 'Military department'...and any other entity within the executive branch that comes into the possession of classified information.'"
Maybe he's doing his own little bit to solve the energy crisis. God knows you could generate quality electrical power from the Founder's spinning corpses by now.
As long as cowards occupy Congress Bush and Cheney are free to break as many laws as they like.
This goes for the cowardly Democrats as well as the Republican sheep.
Reporter: What is the White House's view of the argument the vice president is making on whether or not he's part of the executive branch?
Perino: I'm not opining on it, because the president did not intend for the vice president to be subject as an agency in that section of the E.O.
Reporter: Those are entirely different arguments. So you don't support the vice president's theory ...
Perino: I'm not opining on it either way.
Reporter: But, Dana, how could the vice president earlier in the administration argue he didn't have to turn over records about the energy task force, for example, because he was a member of the executive branch?
Perino: Ask the Supreme Court.
Reporter: He clearly stated that.
Perino: You could ask the Supreme Court, who ruled in his favor.
Reporter: But he did not say, "I'm a member of the legislative branch as well, so I don't have to" -- I mean, he clearly stated that there was strong executive power and he didn't have to turn over these records. Now, when it suits his interests, he seems to be saying a different legal argument.
Perino: Look, I'm not a legal scholar. And there's plenty of them that you can find in Washington, D.C. But just that very point that you're making there shows that he has functions in both the executive branch and the legislative branch.
Reporter: But he didn't mention those dual functions in the earlier legal arguments at the beginning of the administration. He only used the executive branch argument.
Perino: Look, you can try to call his office and try to get more information. I'm not opining on his argument that his office is making ...
Reporter:Was the president satisfied that Alberto Gonzales has not responded yet after five, six months [to] a request by this office to have this issue mediated?
Perino: I think -- I have not asked the president if he's concerned about that. And I would ask you to call over to the Justice Department to find out ...
You wish he were getting closer to something bad. Truth is, the mother fucker will get out of office and continue to rake in millions afterward while doing whatever the fuck he wants getting off scot-free. Don't even try to fool yourself that this mother fucker or anyone else in this dirty administration will ever be brought to trial for any of the illegal bullshit they've foisted off on the American people.
zarth
Seattle, WA
December 2004
JUN 23, 2007 08:19 AM