Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

100 | 101 | 102

 ... 487

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 7

Next

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

MAY 27, 2007 05:10 PM



What a nice way to spend a relaxing holiday weekend. A beer by your side, a burger in your belly, a ball game on the tube… and the ability to pump an Iraqi full of paint at your fingertips.

Iraqi born Wafaa Bilal has become known for provocative interactive video installations. Many of Bilal’s projects over the past few years have addressed the dichotomy of the virtual vs. the real. He attempts to keep in mind the relationship of the viewer to the artwork, with one of his main objectives transforming the normally passive experience of viewing art into an active participation. In Domestic Tension, viewers can log onto the internet to contact, or shoot, Bilal with paintball guns.


It’s simultaneously one of the most interesting, entertaining and disturbing performance art pieces I’ve ever seen. For the next week, viewers can log on to Mr. Bilal’s blog, aim the camera attached to a paintball gun at (or away from) Bilal, and squeeze off a few rounds. It’s kind of like Duck Hunt, but with real people. Good times abound, right?

Not exactly. As Bilal explains in this rather sobering Chicago Tribune piece, he began this project as a response to the U.S. military’s practice of firing rockets at Iraqi targets remotely from places within the United States. He argues that this practice desensitizes its participants to the destructive and terrible realities of war and contributes to American apathy towards Iraqi casualties.

Bilal knows of those harsh realities and mounting casualties all too well.

Wafaa Bilal was born in Iraq on June 10, 1966. Because a member of his family had been accused of disloyalty to his country, Wafaa was denied the opportunity to pursue his dream of being an artist. Instead, he was to attend college to major in geography. While in college, he continued to pursue his art and was arrested and tortured for his political art work against Sadaam Hussein. Shortly after the Gulf War, Wafaa was inspired by President Bush’s message to the Iraqi citizens that if they attempted to overthrow Sadaam, the US would stand behind them. He became involved in organizing opposition to the government and was scheduled for arrest and execution when he escaped into Kuwait. There he was accused of being a spy and was close to being shot when his student ID convinced them he told the truth. Wafaa was sent to a refugee camp on the Kuwaiti border.
[…]
In 1992, Wafaa came to the United States and took classes to learn English… Two months ago, his 21 year old brother who was staunchly apolitical lost his life to stray American gunfire. A few weeks ago, he lost his father whose health deteriorated after the death of his youngest son. It has been 14 years since he was last able to see his mother and younger siblings. He speaks to them on the phone to hear how they flee from one war torn city to another in an effort to find safety.


Living under constant fire has clearly taken its toll on Bilal, who seemed a bit frazzled but confident in his day one video blog...


...22 days later, he’s on the verge of a mental breakdown.

Bilal speaks of “the gun” ruling his life. It’s hanging over him like the Sword of Damocles and he is paying a steep psychological price for every round. It’s enough to make me feel a bit sheepish about the two or three shots I took at him initially and downright terrible for the millions of Iraqi citizens who live under a much more fatal and permanent threat. In that sense, Bilal’s work here is (pardon the term) right on target.

Perhaps Subrosa will stick to Duck Hunt.

Skywisdom

Skywisdom

Portland, OR
December 2005

MAY 27, 2007 06:12 PM

My worry is that people will not understand his point as well as you did Subrosa. I can imagine how many people are thinking "hehehe, I get to shoot some of them Iraqis!".

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

MAY 27, 2007 06:18 PM

Skywisdom said:
My worry is that people will not understand his point as well as you did Subrosa. I can imagine how many people are thinking "hehehe, I get to shoot some of them Iraqis!".



I think that's part of the point. To test people's initial reactions to the opportunity to be anonymously sadistic.

ash67

ash67

USA
October 2005

MAY 27, 2007 07:33 PM

Subrosa said:
[I think that's part of the point. To test people's initial reactions to the opportunity to be anonymously sadistic.



That's pretty much how I veiw it as well.

traceelement

traceelement

Australia
March 2005

MAY 27, 2007 08:14 PM

surreal reminds me of that fish in a blender art installation where it was left up to you to turn the blender on or not.

klopnuts

klopnuts

Beaverdam, OH
January 2007

MAY 27, 2007 08:17 PM

Ive been to iraq. people are only shot by soldiers when they are doing something wrong. something like, oh I don't know, trying to kill me! So this gentelman is just trying to stir up anti soldier sentiment. Support our troops, eve the assholes like me.

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

MAY 27, 2007 08:28 PM

klopnuts said:
Ive been to iraq. people are only shot by soldiers when they are doing something wrong. something like, oh I don't know, trying to kill me! So this gentelman is just trying to stir up anti soldier sentiment. Support our troops, eve the assholes like me.



First off, let me earnestly commend you on your military service.

Beyond that, what you've said here is a load of utter shit. To pretend that there aren't innocent Iraqi casualties is completely asinine. Moreover, the idea that an artist who is attempting to show the human cost of war is somehow "anti-troop" is not only insulting but completely wrong. This installment is anything but anti-troop. It's (loosely) anti-war and definitely anti-dehumanization of Iraqi citizens. They are not at all the same thing.

I suggest you seriously think about why you've come to the conclusion that someone suggesting that innocent people are under considerable stress during wartime is an affront to the troops.

Necia

Necia

San Francisco, CA
August 2005

MAY 27, 2007 08:33 PM

Subrosa said:

Skywisdom said:
My worry is that people will not understand his point as well as you did Subrosa. I can imagine how many people are thinking "hehehe, I get to shoot some of them Iraqis!".



I think that's part of the point. To test people's initial reactions to the opportunity to be anonymously sadistic.



Well, it's not 100% anonymous, though. It displays your IP address and location after you shoot. I was looking at the site and not entirely understanding how it worked, so I clicked the gun and suddenly my IP address shows up, and I realized that that must mean that I'd shot the gun and I felt kind of bad, in a weird sort of way.

This is an intense idea.

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

MAY 27, 2007 08:38 PM

oyaji said:

Subrosa said:

First off, let me earnestly commend you on your military service.



It's the height of absurdity that we feel that a preface such as this is appropriate before deconstructing something said by one of the millions of people who have served in Iraq.



Hey, it's the holiday weekend.

Doesn't make what he said any less dumb.

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

MAY 27, 2007 08:39 PM

Necia said:

Subrosa said:

Skywisdom said:
My worry is that people will not understand his point as well as you did Subrosa. I can imagine how many people are thinking "hehehe, I get to shoot some of them Iraqis!".



I think that's part of the point. To test people's initial reactions to the opportunity to be anonymously sadistic.



Well, it's not 100% anonymous, though. It displays your IP address and location after you shoot. I was looking at the site and not entirely understanding how it worked, so I clicked the gun and suddenly my IP address shows up, and I realized that that must mean that I'd shot the gun and I felt kind of bad, in a weird sort of way.

This is an intense idea.


I didn't realize it showed your IP address. That's really interesting. Gives people a very, very distant sense of accountability.

Rainking13

Rainking13

Saint Peters, MO
December 2006

MAY 27, 2007 08:46 PM

Yeah why is it when people use paintball markers they are always the junky wal-mart 50 buck marker? If he wanted to do this with an artsie flair he should of used the 1 of 5 Aurora Nexus Ego then its art till then its a another pointless abuse of a great game. asshole.

Necia

Necia

San Francisco, CA
August 2005

MAY 27, 2007 08:47 PM

Subrosa said:
I didn't realize it showed your IP address. That's really interesting. Gives people a very, very distant sense of accountability.



It seems like it shows every once in awhile a list of the last 10 shooters by IP address and location. So yes, very distant, but something. Everything can be traced back to somewhere (even an unintentional firing of a paintball gun over the internet); maybe that's another side point of that part of the project.

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

MAY 27, 2007 09:04 PM

That's fucked up. The entire time I was reading it, I had this this image in my head that when you fired the gun it was fake. Like the computer would somehow record whether the person aimed at him or not. Then when I watched the video and saw that it was a REAL paint-ball gun I was like, wtf?!?! That takes some balls (no pun intended) given the amount of assholes out there that probably sat around and actually tried to hit him. On that note, I tried shooting it at the near wall to the left, 'cause I couldn't see any paint, and I'm not entirely sure it's actually shooting paint-balls (tonight anyway).

klopnuts

klopnuts

Beaverdam, OH
January 2007

MAY 27, 2007 09:06 PM

Subrosa said:

klopnuts said:
Ive been to iraq. people are only shot by soldiers when they are doing something wrong. something like, oh I don't know, trying to kill me! So this gentelman is just trying to stir up anti soldier sentiment. Support our troops, eve the assholes like me.



First off, let me earnestly commend you on your military service.

Beyond that, what you've said here is a load of utter shit. To pretend that there aren't innocent Iraqi casualties is completely asinine. Moreover, the idea that an artist who is attempting to show the human cost of war is somehow "anti-troop" is not only insulting but completely wrong. This installment is anything but anti-troop. It's (loosely) anti-war and definitely anti-dehumanization of Iraqi citizens. They are not at all the same thing.

I suggest you seriously think about why you've come to the conclusion that someone suggesting that innocent people are under considerable stress during wartime is an affront to the troops.



I have seen the human cost of war. On both sides. But more civilians have died due to roadside bombs than due to american soldiers shooting them. And to try to un-dehumanize iraqis is not a good idea. In every war we have dehumanized the enemy. it makes what we do acceptable. we should just accept that war is hell and where ever it is fought there will be casualties. and considering that region has been fighting themselves since christ walked the earth makes me able to sleep.

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

MAY 27, 2007 09:06 PM

emotedcreations said:
That's fucked up. The entire time I was reading it, I had this this image in my head that when you fired the gun it was fake. Like the computer would somehow record whether the person aimed at him or not. Then when I watched the video and saw that it was a REAL paint-ball gun I was like, wtf?!?! That takes some balls (no pun intended) given the amount of assholes out there that probably sat around and actually tried to hit him. On that note, I tried shooting it at the near wall to the left, 'cause I couldn't see any paint, and I'm not entirely sure it's actually shooting paint-balls (tonight anyway).



Yeah, I think the yellow paintballs against the white background were a bad choice. I would have gone with green or red or something.

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

MAY 27, 2007 09:23 PM

Red certainly would have been provocative, but you're right, a darker color would have been better.

The whole thing was an interesting idea, although (to me) it says more about peoples tendency to inflict pain when there are no repercussions than it does about attitudes towards American Iraqi populations**.

----

He made it too "fun"...I don't think it mattered who the hell you put in front of that gun. People were going to shoot it. But there definitely was an element of catharsis involved.

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

MAY 27, 2007 09:27 PM

klopnuts said:

Subrosa said:

klopnuts said:
Ive been to iraq. people are only shot by soldiers when they are doing something wrong. something like, oh I don't know, trying to kill me! So this gentelman is just trying to stir up anti soldier sentiment. Support our troops, eve the assholes like me.



First off, let me earnestly commend you on your military service.

Beyond that, what you've said here is a load of utter shit. To pretend that there aren't innocent Iraqi casualties is completely asinine. Moreover, the idea that an artist who is attempting to show the human cost of war is somehow "anti-troop" is not only insulting but completely wrong. This installment is anything but anti-troop. It's (loosely) anti-war and definitely anti-dehumanization of Iraqi citizens. They are not at all the same thing.

I suggest you seriously think about why you've come to the conclusion that someone suggesting that innocent people are under considerable stress during wartime is an affront to the troops.



I have seen the human cost of war. On both sides. But more civilians have died due to roadside bombs than due to american soldiers shooting them. And to try to un-dehumanize iraqis is not a good idea. In every war we have dehumanized the enemy. it makes what we do acceptable. we should just accept that war is hell and where ever it is fought there will be casualties. and considering that region has been fighting themselves since christ walked the earth makes me able to sleep.



Please explain how innocent Iraqis are "the enemy".

Firestar

Firestar

Corpus Christi, TX
January 2007

MAY 27, 2007 09:34 PM

...o.o disturbing...

Bastardo

Bastardo

Boston, MA
January 2005

MAY 27, 2007 09:34 PM

Subrosa said:

klopnuts said:

Subrosa said:

klopnuts said:
Ive been to iraq. people are only shot by soldiers when they are doing something wrong. something like, oh I don't know, trying to kill me! So this gentelman is just trying to stir up anti soldier sentiment. Support our troops, eve the assholes like me.



First off, let me earnestly commend you on your military service.

Beyond that, what you've said here is a load of utter shit. To pretend that there aren't innocent Iraqi casualties is completely asinine. Moreover, the idea that an artist who is attempting to show the human cost of war is somehow "anti-troop" is not only insulting but completely wrong. This installment is anything but anti-troop. It's (loosely) anti-war and definitely anti-dehumanization of Iraqi citizens. They are not at all the same thing.

I suggest you seriously think about why you've come to the conclusion that someone suggesting that innocent people are under considerable stress during wartime is an affront to the troops.



I have seen the human cost of war. On both sides. But more civilians have died due to roadside bombs than due to american soldiers shooting them. And to try to un-dehumanize iraqis is not a good idea. In every war we have dehumanized the enemy. it makes what we do acceptable. we should just accept that war is hell and where ever it is fought there will be casualties. and considering that region has been fighting themselves since christ walked the earth makes me able to sleep.



Please explain how innocent Iraqis are "the enemy".



Duh. They're Iraqis.

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

MAY 27, 2007 09:47 PM

Subrosa said:
Please explain how innocent Iraqis are "the enemy".

They're brown aren't they?

teddy__kgb

teddy__kgb

Albuquerque, NM
February 2007

MAY 27, 2007 10:18 PM

this is a very good piece. i very much appreciate how you allude to the desensitization and sadism inherent in the 'game'. i read an article somewhere once about how nintendo is training all of our future american warriors. im looking for it now...

_kungfoo_

_kungfoo_

Los Angeles, CA
April 2005

MAY 27, 2007 10:23 PM

klopnuts said:
I have seen the human cost of war. On both sides. But more civilians have died due to roadside bombs than due to american soldiers shooting them. And to try to un-dehumanize iraqis is not a good idea. In every war we have dehumanized the enemy. it makes what we do acceptable. we should just accept that war is hell and where ever it is fought there will be casualties. and considering that region has been fighting themselves since christ walked the earth makes me able to sleep.



Sounds like you've been de-humanized.

Cassiel

Cassiel

Aurora, CO
September 2004

MAY 27, 2007 10:46 PM

hunh...this isn't a law/lawyer-related article...

teddy__kgb

teddy__kgb

Albuquerque, NM
February 2007

MAY 27, 2007 10:49 PM

klopnuts said:

Subrosa said:

klopnuts said:
Ive been to iraq. people are only shot by soldiers when they are doing something wrong. something like, oh I don't know, trying to kill me! So this gentelman is just trying to stir up anti soldier sentiment. Support our troops, eve the assholes like me.



First off, let me earnestly commend you on your military service.

Beyond that, what you've said here is a load of utter shit. To pretend that there aren't innocent Iraqi casualties is completely asinine. Moreover, the idea that an artist who is attempting to show the human cost of war is somehow "anti-troop" is not only insulting but completely wrong. This installment is anything but anti-troop. It's (loosely) anti-war and definitely anti-dehumanization of Iraqi citizens. They are not at all the same thing.

I suggest you seriously think about why you've come to the conclusion that someone suggesting that innocent people are under considerable stress during wartime is an affront to the troops.



I have seen the human cost of war. On both sides. But more civilians have died due to roadside bombs than due to american soldiers shooting them. And to try to un-dehumanize iraqis is not a good idea. In every war we have dehumanized the enemy. it makes what we do acceptable. we should just accept that war is hell and where ever it is fought there will be casualties. and considering that region has been fighting themselves since christ walked the earth makes me able to sleep.



'in every war we have dehumanized the enemy. it makes what we do acceptable...' these are your words. i am torn between appreciating and saluting what you do in the military, and criticizing the general viewpoint that 'dehumanizing the enemy' is ok. i understand you are putting your life on the line for all of our first-world freedoms, but it is incumbent upon military leaders to at least BEGIN to understand the cultural root of these problems. i also realize, in my own rudimentary knowledge of the areas historical and cultural history, that many creeds and faiths have been at each others throats for millenia. there is something large at stake for these populations, and to gloss over these profound and complex issues with...'and considering that region has been fighting themselves since christ walked the earth makes me able to sleep...' represents an american attitude which does nothing but compound the problem. dont kid yourself, though, were not over there because 'its the right thing to do'. were over there because it profits a very few rich, white men to make war. their similar lack of cultural awareness has trickled down the ranks, so to speak. you serve them and their immoral ends, yet at the same time you ACTUALLY ARE helping protect first-world liberties...is it ironic? yes. you know what the man said, though, war is hell...

klopnuts

klopnuts

Beaverdam, OH
January 2007

MAY 27, 2007 10:58 PM

Subrosa said:

klopnuts said:

Subrosa said:

klopnuts said:
Ive been to iraq. people are only shot by soldiers when they are doing something wrong. something like, oh I don't know, trying to kill me! So this gentelman is just trying to stir up anti soldier sentiment. Support our troops, eve the assholes like me.



First off, let me earnestly commend you on your military service.

Beyond that, what you've said here is a load of utter shit. To pretend that there aren't innocent Iraqi casualties is completely asinine. Moreover, the idea that an artist who is attempting to show the human cost of war is somehow "anti-troop" is not only insulting but completely wrong. This installment is anything but anti-troop. It's (loosely) anti-war and definitely anti-dehumanization of Iraqi citizens. They are not at all the same thing.

I suggest you seriously think about why you've come to the conclusion that someone suggesting that innocent people are under considerable stress during wartime is an affront to the troops.



I have seen the human cost of war. On both sides. But more civilians have died due to roadside bombs than due to american soldiers shooting them. And to try to un-dehumanize iraqis is not a good idea. In every war we have dehumanized the enemy. it makes what we do acceptable. we should just accept that war is hell and where ever it is fought there will be casualties. and considering that region has been fighting themselves since christ walked the earth makes me able to sleep.



Please explain how innocent Iraqis are "the enemy".



The simple explination is that this war has only one side wearing uniforms. So you have to assume that everyone is the enemy. There life is meaningless unless its Your family or clan. They have been desensitized by violence all around. They learn early that life is short. So with the way they live, Im inclined to believe Mr. Bilal isnt bothered nearly as much as he is projecting.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 7

Next