Greybeard said:
Furthermore, there is nothing whatsoever in any of my blog entries or discussion posts to suggest an unhealthy interest in children. He simply made it up out of nothing.

Most of his posts on these boards are based on nothing, so really, is this surprising?

Greybeard

Los Angeles, CA

December 2006

MAR 22, 2007 12:01 PM

mingol said:

Greybeard said:
Furthermore, there is nothing whatsoever in any of my blog entries or discussion posts to suggest an unhealthy interest in children. He simply made it up out of nothing.

Most of his posts on these boards are based on nothing, so really, is this surprising?

You've got a point there. I should probably just ignore him altogether, but I think it's really lame that he sought out my blog page and posted something so grievously insulting and irrelevant, and it pisses me off.

Question to Moderator: Does that qualify as Hate Speech?

bean

STAFF

Los Angeles, CA

MAR 22, 2007 02:45 PM

oyaji said:

swedrock said:
Two simple facts:

1. The justice system is, and always will be, deeply prejudicial on the basis of the judges' and justices' political beiliefs.

2. Some judges serve at the discretion of politicians, those positions are not, and have never been, stable or safe careers.

Federal judges have life appointments precisely in order to insulate them from political pressures.

It has been a longstanding principle of our system that the execution of the law must be equal and fair. This is why we consider ourselves to respect "the rule of law." The rule of law means we adhere to the principles and rules fixed in statutes, common law and constitutional law regardless of to whom those principles are applied. When leaders and their agents seek to selectively apply (or not apply) the law depending on the party affiliation of the individual subject to such application, those leaders undermine one of the axiomatic principles supporting the republic.

It is imperative that we reject and correct such behavior.

Has anyone pointed out that the people who were fired weren't federal judges but federal prosecutors yet? Even if swedrock had a valid point, it would be totally irrelevant to the thread.

wildswan

I'm lost

June 2006

MAR 22, 2007 02:57 PM

oyaji said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

*sigh*

zarth

Seattle, WA

December 2004

MAR 22, 2007 03:01 PM

wildswan said:

oyaji said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

*sigh*

You're just a sucker for the word "imperative," aren't you?

NickFaust

USA

April 2004

MAR 22, 2007 03:04 PM

Zarth said:

wildswan said:

oyaji said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

*sigh*

You're just a sucker for the word "imperative," aren't you?

Nah, I think it was the whole "rule of law" thing.

NickFaust

USA

April 2004

MAR 22, 2007 06:10 PM

oyaji said:

NickFaust said:

Zarth said:

You're just a sucker for the word "imperative," aren't you?

Nah, I think it was the whole "rule of law" thing.

You suckers are just jealous.

Damned straight!

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

MAR 22, 2007 06:14 PM

oyaji said:

NickFaust said:

Zarth said:

You're just a sucker for the word "imperative," aren't you?

Nah, I think it was the whole "rule of law" thing.

You suckers are just jealous.

Rule me with your law, o man of steel!

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA

July 2004

MAR 22, 2007 06:31 PM

bald_eagle said:
This thread's just a little, uh

No, no. This thread is awesome.

ASSH0LE

Las Vegas, NV

June 2003

MAR 22, 2007 10:27 PM

Greybeard said:
For The Record: I don't even have a car, let alone a van.

Aha!

ASSH0LE

Las Vegas, NV

June 2003

MAR 22, 2007 10:50 PM

oyaji said:

NickFaust said:

Zarth said:

You're just a sucker for the word "imperative," aren't you?

Nah, I think it was the whole "rule of law" thing.

You suckers are just jealous.

I got too caught up trying to work up a poetic coupling of "heart" and "party of the first part" that'd tug at her heartstrings to get my point heard.

saltonsea

Toronto, ON

July 2004

MAR 24, 2007 06:24 PM

Zarth said:

saltonsea said:
saying, "oh well, that's just the way it is." is no excuse for gross misconduct.

Says the Canadian. You guys just don't understand how democracy works.

ah-ha....i'm not canadian...
thus side-stepping your logic...

PAGE:

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

BOARDS:

TOPICS:

Singapore

July 2005

MAR 22, 2007 11:33 AM

Los Angeles, CA

December 2006

MAR 22, 2007 12:01 PM

STAFF

Los Angeles, CA

MAR 22, 2007 02:45 PM

I'm lost

June 2006

MAR 22, 2007 02:57 PM

zarth

Seattle, WA

December 2004

MAR 22, 2007 03:01 PM

USA

April 2004

MAR 22, 2007 03:04 PM

USA

April 2004

MAR 22, 2007 06:10 PM

NEWSWIRE

Australia

MAR 22, 2007 06:14 PM

San Francisco, CA

July 2004

MAR 22, 2007 06:31 PM

Las Vegas, NV

June 2003

MAR 22, 2007 10:27 PM

Las Vegas, NV

June 2003

MAR 22, 2007 10:50 PM

Toronto, ON

July 2004

MAR 24, 2007 06:24 PM