Why President Bush isn't as bad as the left would have you think

whoops double reply post
in my butt.

I'm not sure what sort of mad debating skillz can save a topic as meaningless as "Why President Bush isn't as bad as the left would have you think". The premise here does not even remotely conform to logic.It leaves you with all sorts of subjective variables. Who is the left? What do they believe? Is this belief uniform? What is the reality? What does it prove anyway (ie, what does "the left"'s opinion matter?)? In other words, you are trying to prove an unprovable and irrelevant assertion with a bunch of unmeasurable indeterminate criteria.

Maybe it will all make more sense on page 19.

Page 19 is where the cannibal pygmy tribe of Eastern Arizona lives. Not this 'logic' stuff that everyone keeps demanding from the OP.

i don't even think mad debating skillz would be necessary to tell mucci that his editorial was, in the least, extremely lacking, unsubstantiated, and false.

oh, mucci, an editorial is a published opinion, and definitely open to debate and ridicule, regardless of how well written it is.

in my butt, that is.